中危肺栓塞患者的选择性治疗管理

N. Diaconu, I. Civirjic, G. Sorici, A. Grosu, T. Cuzor, Sabina Racila-Iatco
{"title":"中危肺栓塞患者的选择性治疗管理","authors":"N. Diaconu, I. Civirjic, G. Sorici, A. Grosu, T. Cuzor, Sabina Racila-Iatco","doi":"10.52418/moldovan-med-j.66-2.23.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Few studies have evaluated the thrombolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism, making this study more valuable. Material and methods: It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-center study. Eligible patients at the age of 18 or older with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography with onset until 14 day and signs of right ventricular (RV) overload on echocardiography took part in the study. Pulmonary Arterial CT Obstruction Index Rate (PACTOIR) was used to define the localization and the expansion zone of thromboembolism. This study included 18 patients with intermediate risk and acute submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. In thrombolysis (TT) group (n=9) were used 50 mg of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) administered in infusion as 0.4 mg/h for 2 hours. In the standard anticoagulation group, unfractioned heparin (UFH) was administered as a bolus of 70 units/kg or a maximum of 5000 units, followed by continuous infusion at an initial rate of 16 units/kg or a maximum of 1000 units/h. Results: The mean age for TT group was 69 vs 63 for the UFH group. PACTOIR was 100% in 3 patients in the half-dose rt-PA group and in 2 patients in the UFH group. RV/LV diameter ratio decreased from baseline to 48 h post-procedure (1.55 vs. 1.13; mean difference, -0.42; p < 0.0001). Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 55 mm Hg in both groups (p < 0.05), with 53 [43–60] in TT group vs. 41.5 [37–45] mmHg in UFH group, P<0.05. Also, RV/ LV ratio and systolic PAP decreased significantly in both groups. Severe bleeding with a need in red blood cell transfusion was seen in 0.11% (1 patient) in the TT group vs 0 in UFH group. The hospitalization length of stay was significantly shorter in the TT group (3.8±1.8, p < 0.05). The rate of secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the UFH group with a high rate of pulmonary hypertension (0 vs. 19%, p=0.003). Conclusions: Half-dose thrombolytic therapy in patients diagnosed with submassive pulmonary embolism significantly reduced death and hemodynamic decompensation in the first 7 days compared to anticoagulant therapy only. With all that being said, it can be concluded that patients with high-intermediate risk PE could benefit from reduced-dose TT.","PeriodicalId":32733,"journal":{"name":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","volume":"37 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optional therapeutic management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients\",\"authors\":\"N. Diaconu, I. Civirjic, G. Sorici, A. Grosu, T. Cuzor, Sabina Racila-Iatco\",\"doi\":\"10.52418/moldovan-med-j.66-2.23.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Few studies have evaluated the thrombolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism, making this study more valuable. Material and methods: It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-center study. Eligible patients at the age of 18 or older with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography with onset until 14 day and signs of right ventricular (RV) overload on echocardiography took part in the study. Pulmonary Arterial CT Obstruction Index Rate (PACTOIR) was used to define the localization and the expansion zone of thromboembolism. This study included 18 patients with intermediate risk and acute submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. In thrombolysis (TT) group (n=9) were used 50 mg of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) administered in infusion as 0.4 mg/h for 2 hours. In the standard anticoagulation group, unfractioned heparin (UFH) was administered as a bolus of 70 units/kg or a maximum of 5000 units, followed by continuous infusion at an initial rate of 16 units/kg or a maximum of 1000 units/h. Results: The mean age for TT group was 69 vs 63 for the UFH group. PACTOIR was 100% in 3 patients in the half-dose rt-PA group and in 2 patients in the UFH group. RV/LV diameter ratio decreased from baseline to 48 h post-procedure (1.55 vs. 1.13; mean difference, -0.42; p < 0.0001). Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 55 mm Hg in both groups (p < 0.05), with 53 [43–60] in TT group vs. 41.5 [37–45] mmHg in UFH group, P<0.05. Also, RV/ LV ratio and systolic PAP decreased significantly in both groups. Severe bleeding with a need in red blood cell transfusion was seen in 0.11% (1 patient) in the TT group vs 0 in UFH group. The hospitalization length of stay was significantly shorter in the TT group (3.8±1.8, p < 0.05). The rate of secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the UFH group with a high rate of pulmonary hypertension (0 vs. 19%, p=0.003). Conclusions: Half-dose thrombolytic therapy in patients diagnosed with submassive pulmonary embolism significantly reduced death and hemodynamic decompensation in the first 7 days compared to anticoagulant therapy only. With all that being said, it can be concluded that patients with high-intermediate risk PE could benefit from reduced-dose TT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Moldovan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 39\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Moldovan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.66-2.23.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.66-2.23.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少有研究对中高危肺栓塞患者的溶栓治疗进行评估,因此本研究更有价值。材料与方法这是一项前瞻性、非随机、开放标签、单中心研究。年龄在 18 岁或以上、经 CT 肺血管造影确认为急性肺栓塞(PE)且发病至 14 天、超声心动图显示有右心室(RV)负荷过重迹象的合格患者参加了研究。肺动脉 CT 阻塞指数(PACTOIR)用于确定血栓栓塞的定位和扩张区域。这项研究纳入了18名中危急性亚严重肺血栓栓塞患者。溶栓(TT)组(9 人)使用 50 毫克组织浆蛋白酶原激活剂(t-PA),以每小时 0.4 毫克的速度输注,持续 2 小时。在标准抗凝治疗组中,非减量肝素(UFH)的给药剂量为 70 单位/公斤或最多 5000 单位,然后以 16 单位/公斤或最多 1000 单位/小时的初始速度持续输注。结果TT 组的平均年龄为 69 岁,UFH 组为 63 岁。半剂量 rt-PA 组中有 3 名患者的 PACTOIR 为 100%,UFH 组中有 2 名患者的 PACTOIR 为 100%。从基线到术后 48 小时,RV/LV 直径比有所下降(1.55 对 1.13;平均差异为-0.42;P < 0.0001)。两组的平均肺动脉收缩压均为 55 mmHg(P < 0.05),TT 组为 53 [43-60] mmHg,UFH 组为 41.5 [37-45] mmHg,P < 0.05。此外,两组的 RV/ LV 比值和收缩压均显著下降。TT 组有 0.11% 的患者(1 例)出现严重出血,需要输注红细胞,而 UFH 组为 0 例。TT 组的住院时间明显缩短(3.8±1.8,P < 0.05)。UFH 组的次要终点发生率明显更高,其中肺动脉高压发生率较高(0 对 19%,P=0.003)。结论与仅采用抗凝疗法相比,半剂量溶栓疗法可显著减少亚严重肺栓塞患者在最初7天内的死亡和血流动力学失代偿。综上所述,可以得出结论:中高危肺栓塞患者可以从减量 TT 疗法中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optional therapeutic management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients
Background: Few studies have evaluated the thrombolytic treatment in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism, making this study more valuable. Material and methods: It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-center study. Eligible patients at the age of 18 or older with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography with onset until 14 day and signs of right ventricular (RV) overload on echocardiography took part in the study. Pulmonary Arterial CT Obstruction Index Rate (PACTOIR) was used to define the localization and the expansion zone of thromboembolism. This study included 18 patients with intermediate risk and acute submassive pulmonary thromboembolism. In thrombolysis (TT) group (n=9) were used 50 mg of tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) administered in infusion as 0.4 mg/h for 2 hours. In the standard anticoagulation group, unfractioned heparin (UFH) was administered as a bolus of 70 units/kg or a maximum of 5000 units, followed by continuous infusion at an initial rate of 16 units/kg or a maximum of 1000 units/h. Results: The mean age for TT group was 69 vs 63 for the UFH group. PACTOIR was 100% in 3 patients in the half-dose rt-PA group and in 2 patients in the UFH group. RV/LV diameter ratio decreased from baseline to 48 h post-procedure (1.55 vs. 1.13; mean difference, -0.42; p < 0.0001). Mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 55 mm Hg in both groups (p < 0.05), with 53 [43–60] in TT group vs. 41.5 [37–45] mmHg in UFH group, P<0.05. Also, RV/ LV ratio and systolic PAP decreased significantly in both groups. Severe bleeding with a need in red blood cell transfusion was seen in 0.11% (1 patient) in the TT group vs 0 in UFH group. The hospitalization length of stay was significantly shorter in the TT group (3.8±1.8, p < 0.05). The rate of secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the UFH group with a high rate of pulmonary hypertension (0 vs. 19%, p=0.003). Conclusions: Half-dose thrombolytic therapy in patients diagnosed with submassive pulmonary embolism significantly reduced death and hemodynamic decompensation in the first 7 days compared to anticoagulant therapy only. With all that being said, it can be concluded that patients with high-intermediate risk PE could benefit from reduced-dose TT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信