解构美国的崇高:约翰-斯坦贝克《崇高的西部》中的危机

IF 0.9 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Nikolai Wansart
{"title":"解构美国的崇高:约翰-斯坦贝克《崇高的西部》中的危机","authors":"Nikolai Wansart","doi":"10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.2.0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines John Steinbeck’s transformation of the aesthetics of the American Sublime in twentieth-century America. In To a God Unknown (1933), The Grapes of Wrath (1939), East of Eden (1952), and Travels with Charley (1962), Steinbeck taps into the tradition of the sublime that Transcendentalism and the Hudson River School had adapted for American literature. The American Sublime functions in three dimensions, all of which Steinbeck uses: first, in the connotation that the natural space of the continent is nationalistically American; second, in socioeconomic developments that realize the nation’s potential in agricultural economy; and third, in visual tradition. Steinbeck’s sensitivity for this complex of ideas is evidenced in his reception of Emerson’s works in the 1930s. For his descriptions of Steinbeck country closely resemble the visual perspectives in which the Hudson River School portrayed the American Sublime. Steinbeck’s dismantling of this aesthetic is related to his ecological monism: It emphasizes the ultimate dependence of the American Sublime on natural realities and contradicts the economic rationalizations of Steinbeck country, which eventually divide into economic and social fragments in The Grapes of Wrath. By echoing the visual presentations and ideological directives of the most comprehensively conceptualized sublime in America from the nineteenth century and illustrating its defeat at the hands of a capitalized, displaced nation, Steinbeck’s treatment of the sublime also anticipates its discussion in postmodernism.","PeriodicalId":40417,"journal":{"name":"Steinbeck Review","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dismantling the American Sublime: Crisis in John Steinbeck’s Sublime West\",\"authors\":\"Nikolai Wansart\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.2.0256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines John Steinbeck’s transformation of the aesthetics of the American Sublime in twentieth-century America. In To a God Unknown (1933), The Grapes of Wrath (1939), East of Eden (1952), and Travels with Charley (1962), Steinbeck taps into the tradition of the sublime that Transcendentalism and the Hudson River School had adapted for American literature. The American Sublime functions in three dimensions, all of which Steinbeck uses: first, in the connotation that the natural space of the continent is nationalistically American; second, in socioeconomic developments that realize the nation’s potential in agricultural economy; and third, in visual tradition. Steinbeck’s sensitivity for this complex of ideas is evidenced in his reception of Emerson’s works in the 1930s. For his descriptions of Steinbeck country closely resemble the visual perspectives in which the Hudson River School portrayed the American Sublime. Steinbeck’s dismantling of this aesthetic is related to his ecological monism: It emphasizes the ultimate dependence of the American Sublime on natural realities and contradicts the economic rationalizations of Steinbeck country, which eventually divide into economic and social fragments in The Grapes of Wrath. By echoing the visual presentations and ideological directives of the most comprehensively conceptualized sublime in America from the nineteenth century and illustrating its defeat at the hands of a capitalized, displaced nation, Steinbeck’s treatment of the sublime also anticipates its discussion in postmodernism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Steinbeck Review\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Steinbeck Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.2.0256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steinbeck Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/steinbeckreview.20.2.0256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了约翰-斯坦贝克对二十世纪美国崇高美学的改造。在《致未知的上帝》(To a God Unknown,1933 年)、《愤怒的葡萄》(The Grapes of Wrath,1939 年)、《伊甸园之东》(East of Eden,1952 年)和《与查理同行》(Travels with Charley,1962 年)中,斯坦贝克继承了超验主义和哈德逊河学派为美国文学改造的崇高传统。美国的崇高在三个层面上发挥作用,斯坦贝克都采用了这三个层面:第一,大陆的自然空间具有美国民族主义的内涵;第二,社会经济的发展实现了国家在农业经济方面的潜力;第三,视觉传统。斯坦贝克在 20 世纪 30 年代对爱默生作品的接受中,体现了他对这一复杂思想的敏感性。因为他对斯坦贝克乡村的描述与哈德逊河学派描绘美国崇高的视觉视角非常相似。斯坦贝克对这种美学的拆解与他的生态一元论有关:它强调美国崇高最终依赖于自然现实,与斯坦贝克乡村的经济合理化相矛盾,最终在《愤怒的葡萄》中分裂为经济和社会碎片。斯坦贝克对崇高的处理呼应了十九世纪美国最全面概念化的崇高的视觉呈现和意识形态指令,并说明了它在一个资本化、流离失所的国家手中的失败,这也预示了后现代主义对崇高的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dismantling the American Sublime: Crisis in John Steinbeck’s Sublime West
This article examines John Steinbeck’s transformation of the aesthetics of the American Sublime in twentieth-century America. In To a God Unknown (1933), The Grapes of Wrath (1939), East of Eden (1952), and Travels with Charley (1962), Steinbeck taps into the tradition of the sublime that Transcendentalism and the Hudson River School had adapted for American literature. The American Sublime functions in three dimensions, all of which Steinbeck uses: first, in the connotation that the natural space of the continent is nationalistically American; second, in socioeconomic developments that realize the nation’s potential in agricultural economy; and third, in visual tradition. Steinbeck’s sensitivity for this complex of ideas is evidenced in his reception of Emerson’s works in the 1930s. For his descriptions of Steinbeck country closely resemble the visual perspectives in which the Hudson River School portrayed the American Sublime. Steinbeck’s dismantling of this aesthetic is related to his ecological monism: It emphasizes the ultimate dependence of the American Sublime on natural realities and contradicts the economic rationalizations of Steinbeck country, which eventually divide into economic and social fragments in The Grapes of Wrath. By echoing the visual presentations and ideological directives of the most comprehensively conceptualized sublime in America from the nineteenth century and illustrating its defeat at the hands of a capitalized, displaced nation, Steinbeck’s treatment of the sublime also anticipates its discussion in postmodernism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Steinbeck Review
Steinbeck Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Steinbeck Review is an authorized publication on the life and works of American novelist John Steinbeck (1902–1968). It publishes scholarly articles; notes; book and performance reviews; creative writing; original artwork; and short intercalary pieces offering fresh perspectives, including notes on contemporary references to Steinbeck, discussions of the contexts of his work, and an occasional poem. Steinbeck Review has a threefold mission of broadening the scope of Steinbeck criticism, promoting the work of new and established scholars, and serving as a resource for Steinbeck teachers at all levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信