上肢手术锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因辅助药物的镇痛效果:前瞻性随机研究

Digvijay Prakash Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai, Ram G. Maurya, Harshit Rastogi, Gyan P Singh
{"title":"上肢手术锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因辅助药物的镇痛效果:前瞻性随机研究","authors":"Digvijay Prakash Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai, Ram G. Maurya, Harshit Rastogi, Gyan P Singh","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 100 patients of age 18–55 years, planned for elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator, were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and Group 2 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and adverse events during the perioperative period were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block in Group 1 (16. 26 ± 2.23 and 21.68 ± 2.90 min) was slower than those in Group 2 (9.12 ± 2.40 and 12.68 ± 2.62 min), (<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block in Group 1 was significantly shorter than those in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in Group 1 (402.80 ± 28.21 min) was shorter than that in Group 2 (981.00 ± 92.26 min; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of the side effects, except in the incidence of sedation which is significantly higher in Group 2, (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular nerve block resulted in earlier onset and prolonged duration of the sensorimotor blockade and provided a longer pain-free postoperative period without significant hemodynamic alterations.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study\",\"authors\":\"Digvijay Prakash Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai, Ram G. Maurya, Harshit Rastogi, Gyan P Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 100 patients of age 18–55 years, planned for elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator, were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and Group 2 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and adverse events during the perioperative period were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block in Group 1 (16. 26 ± 2.23 and 21.68 ± 2.90 min) was slower than those in Group 2 (9.12 ± 2.40 and 12.68 ± 2.62 min), (<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block in Group 1 was significantly shorter than those in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in Group 1 (402.80 ± 28.21 min) was shorter than that in Group 2 (981.00 ± 92.26 min; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of the side effects, except in the incidence of sedation which is significantly higher in Group 2, (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular nerve block resulted in earlier onset and prolonged duration of the sensorimotor blockade and provided a longer pain-free postoperative period without significant hemodynamic alterations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项随机对照研究的主要目的是评估在罗哌卡因中加入右美托咪定对锁骨上臂丛阻滞下接受上肢手术的患者感觉和运动阻滞的起始时间、持续时间以及镇痛时间的影响。 研究人员将 100 名年龄在 18-55 岁之间、计划在锁骨上臂丛阻滞下使用神经刺激器进行上肢择期手术的患者随机分为两组。第一组(n = 50)接受 30 mL 0.5% 罗哌卡因和 1 mL 生理盐水,第二组(n = 50)接受 30 mL 0.5% 罗哌卡因和 1 μg/kg 右美托咪定。记录了围手术期感觉和运动阻滞的发生和持续时间、镇痛持续时间以及不良反应。 第一组的感觉和运动阻滞起始时间(16.26 ± 2.23 分钟和 21.68 ± 2.90 分钟)慢于第二组(9.12 ± 2.40 分钟和 12.68 ± 2.62 分钟)(<0.001)。第 1 组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间明显短于第 2 组(P < 0.001)。第一组的镇痛持续时间(402.80 ± 28.21 分钟)短于第二组(981.00 ± 92.26 分钟;P < 0.001)。除了镇静的发生率明显高于第 2 组外,两组的副作用发生率在统计学上无明显差异(P < 0.001)。 右美托咪定与罗哌卡因一起用于锁骨上神经阻滞可使感觉运动阻滞更早开始,持续时间更长,术后无痛时间更长,且无明显血流动力学改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study
The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 100 patients of age 18–55 years, planned for elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator, were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and Group 2 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and adverse events during the perioperative period were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block in Group 1 (16. 26 ± 2.23 and 21.68 ± 2.90 min) was slower than those in Group 2 (9.12 ± 2.40 and 12.68 ± 2.62 min), (<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block in Group 1 was significantly shorter than those in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in Group 1 (402.80 ± 28.21 min) was shorter than that in Group 2 (981.00 ± 92.26 min; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of the side effects, except in the incidence of sedation which is significantly higher in Group 2, (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular nerve block resulted in earlier onset and prolonged duration of the sensorimotor blockade and provided a longer pain-free postoperative period without significant hemodynamic alterations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信