{"title":"在阿多诺作品集前","authors":"János Weiss","doi":"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.","PeriodicalId":508302,"journal":{"name":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Egy Adorno-összeállítás elé\",\"authors\":\"János Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
By this compilation we celebrate Adorno’s 120th birthday. Adorno’s lecture points to the importance of criticism for a future theory of aesthetics, while Gorsen questions the narrowing of the object of aesthetics to the analysis of canonized works, stressing that art thereby loses the subversive potential to which it was attributed for the student movements. In their interpretations, the authors reconstruct Adorno’s concept of “late work” and his analysis of the culture industry, and carry out a comparative analysis of Adorno and Deleuze.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
