了解学生对计算机科学课程教学的评价

Zixuan Wang, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly
{"title":"了解学生对计算机科学课程教学的评价","authors":"Zixuan Wang, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly","doi":"10.1145/3627217.3627220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding student perceptions in higher education is vital for optimizing teaching and learning practices. This research explores the relationship between course characteristics, Student Evaluation of Teaching, and disciplinary differences, with a particular focus on Computer Science courses. Analyzing data from the second half of the 2022 semester at one university, the study investigates the impact of course level, type, and size on student evaluation scores. Additionally, it compares Computer Science courses to other disciplines, revealing key differences in student satisfaction and perceptions. Findings indicate that second-year courses received lower ratings, and theoretical courses in online formats received higher satisfaction than programming courses. Smaller course sizes correlated with higher scores across multiple aspects. However, Computer Science courses scored lower overall and in crucial areas compared to other disciplines, highlighting the need for tailored teaching strategies. This research underscores the importance of continuous assessment and adaptation in higher education to foster positive learning environments and improve student experiences.","PeriodicalId":508655,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Student Evaluation of Teaching in Computer Science Courses\",\"authors\":\"Zixuan Wang, Paul Denny, Juho Leinonen, Andrew Luxton-Reilly\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3627217.3627220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding student perceptions in higher education is vital for optimizing teaching and learning practices. This research explores the relationship between course characteristics, Student Evaluation of Teaching, and disciplinary differences, with a particular focus on Computer Science courses. Analyzing data from the second half of the 2022 semester at one university, the study investigates the impact of course level, type, and size on student evaluation scores. Additionally, it compares Computer Science courses to other disciplines, revealing key differences in student satisfaction and perceptions. Findings indicate that second-year courses received lower ratings, and theoretical courses in online formats received higher satisfaction than programming courses. Smaller course sizes correlated with higher scores across multiple aspects. However, Computer Science courses scored lower overall and in crucial areas compared to other disciplines, highlighting the need for tailored teaching strategies. This research underscores the importance of continuous assessment and adaptation in higher education to foster positive learning environments and improve student experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3627217.3627220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3627217.3627220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高等教育中,了解学生的看法对于优化教学实践至关重要。本研究探讨了课程特点、学生教学评价和学科差异之间的关系,尤其关注计算机科学课程。研究分析了一所大学 2022 年下半年的数据,调查了课程水平、类型和规模对学生评价分数的影响。此外,研究还将计算机科学课程与其他学科进行了比较,揭示了学生满意度和看法的主要差异。研究结果表明,二年级课程的评分较低,在线形式的理论课程比编程课程的满意度高。较小的课程规模与较高的多方面得分相关。然而,与其他学科相比,计算机科学课程的总体得分和关键领域的得分都较低,这凸显了因材施教教学策略的必要性。这项研究强调了在高等教育中进行持续评估和调整以营造积极的学习环境和改善学生体验的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Student Evaluation of Teaching in Computer Science Courses
Understanding student perceptions in higher education is vital for optimizing teaching and learning practices. This research explores the relationship between course characteristics, Student Evaluation of Teaching, and disciplinary differences, with a particular focus on Computer Science courses. Analyzing data from the second half of the 2022 semester at one university, the study investigates the impact of course level, type, and size on student evaluation scores. Additionally, it compares Computer Science courses to other disciplines, revealing key differences in student satisfaction and perceptions. Findings indicate that second-year courses received lower ratings, and theoretical courses in online formats received higher satisfaction than programming courses. Smaller course sizes correlated with higher scores across multiple aspects. However, Computer Science courses scored lower overall and in crucial areas compared to other disciplines, highlighting the need for tailored teaching strategies. This research underscores the importance of continuous assessment and adaptation in higher education to foster positive learning environments and improve student experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信