想象力的形成与话语精神

Thiago Barbosa Soares
{"title":"想象力的形成与话语精神","authors":"Thiago Barbosa Soares","doi":"10.12957/palimpsesto.2023.76917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals comparatively with the notions, belonging to the field of action of Discourse Analysis, of imaginary formation and discursive ethos, from the perspective of the internal transformation of how certain principles of language are conceived to the point of changing the conceptual functioning of these analytical operators and how historical determinations remodel them. For this purpose, it deals, from based on certain epistemological instruments, with the similarities and differences between these two notions. As a result of this investigation, it was found that both highlight, according to their respective epistemic contributions, elements of the discursive construction process that are relatively close, so that the distinction between them lies in the emphasis given, by each, to the constitutive mechanisms of the manifestation of the members participants of the discourse.","PeriodicalId":503726,"journal":{"name":"Palimpsesto - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UERJ","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaginary formation and discursive ethos\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Barbosa Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.12957/palimpsesto.2023.76917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals comparatively with the notions, belonging to the field of action of Discourse Analysis, of imaginary formation and discursive ethos, from the perspective of the internal transformation of how certain principles of language are conceived to the point of changing the conceptual functioning of these analytical operators and how historical determinations remodel them. For this purpose, it deals, from based on certain epistemological instruments, with the similarities and differences between these two notions. As a result of this investigation, it was found that both highlight, according to their respective epistemic contributions, elements of the discursive construction process that are relatively close, so that the distinction between them lies in the emphasis given, by each, to the constitutive mechanisms of the manifestation of the members participants of the discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palimpsesto - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UERJ\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palimpsesto - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UERJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12957/palimpsesto.2023.76917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palimpsesto - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UERJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/palimpsesto.2023.76917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从某些语言原则的内部转变角度出发,比较论述了属于话语分析行动领域的 "想象的形成 "和 "话语精神 "这两个概念。为此,它基于某些认识论工具,探讨了这两个概念之间的异同。研究结果表明,根据各自的认识论贡献,这两个概念都突出了话语建构过程中相对接近的要素,因此,它们之间的区别在于各自对话语参与者表现的构成机制的重视程度不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaginary formation and discursive ethos
This article deals comparatively with the notions, belonging to the field of action of Discourse Analysis, of imaginary formation and discursive ethos, from the perspective of the internal transformation of how certain principles of language are conceived to the point of changing the conceptual functioning of these analytical operators and how historical determinations remodel them. For this purpose, it deals, from based on certain epistemological instruments, with the similarities and differences between these two notions. As a result of this investigation, it was found that both highlight, according to their respective epistemic contributions, elements of the discursive construction process that are relatively close, so that the distinction between them lies in the emphasis given, by each, to the constitutive mechanisms of the manifestation of the members participants of the discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信