开发替代能源主题 STEM 整合模块的可行性分析

Alfia Fitrianti, Irma Rahma Suwarma, I. Kaniawati
{"title":"开发替代能源主题 STEM 整合模块的可行性分析","authors":"Alfia Fitrianti, Irma Rahma Suwarma, I. Kaniawati","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to determine the feasibility that STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics. The method used in this research is Research and Development with a 4D development model (Four-D Models). The validity test was conducted by two lecturers of the Master of Physics Education at the Indonesian University of Education and one physics teacher at a senior high school in Karawang. Readability test conducted by 7 students of grade x. The instruments used are material conformity instruments with STEM aspects, teaching material feasibility test instruments, and student readability sheets. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the STEM-based physics module on the topic of alternative energy developed is feasible because it obtains valid criteria in each validation category, including the component of material suitability with STEM, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. In the feasibility component of teaching materials (modules), 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the presentation component, 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the linguistic component, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. Meanwhile, the readability test results conducted were at a high criterion of 86.43%. Thus, the development of STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics is \"feasible\" to be widely applied.","PeriodicalId":507194,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability Analysis of the Development of STEM-Integrated Module on Alternative Energy Topics\",\"authors\":\"Alfia Fitrianti, Irma Rahma Suwarma, I. Kaniawati\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to determine the feasibility that STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics. The method used in this research is Research and Development with a 4D development model (Four-D Models). The validity test was conducted by two lecturers of the Master of Physics Education at the Indonesian University of Education and one physics teacher at a senior high school in Karawang. Readability test conducted by 7 students of grade x. The instruments used are material conformity instruments with STEM aspects, teaching material feasibility test instruments, and student readability sheets. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the STEM-based physics module on the topic of alternative energy developed is feasible because it obtains valid criteria in each validation category, including the component of material suitability with STEM, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. In the feasibility component of teaching materials (modules), 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the presentation component, 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the linguistic component, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. Meanwhile, the readability test results conducted were at a high criterion of 86.43%. Thus, the development of STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics is \\\"feasible\\\" to be widely applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i2.6197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定基于 STEM 的替代能源主题物理模块的可行性。本研究采用的方法是四维开发模式(Four-D Models)的研究与开发。印尼教育大学两名物理教育硕士讲师和卡拉旺一所高中的一名物理教师进行了有效性测试。可读性测试由 x 年级的 7 名学生进行。使用的工具包括 STEM 方面的材料符合性工具、教材可行性测试工具和学生可读性表。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,基于 STEM 的替代能源主题物理模块是可行的,因为它在每个验证类别中都获得了有效标准,包括与 STEM 的材料适用性部分,0.8 被归类为有效。在教材(模块)可行性部分,0.79 被归类为有效。在表现形式部分,0.79 为有效。在语言部分,0.8 为有效。同时,可读性测试结果达到了 86.43% 的高标准。因此,开发基于 STEM 的替代能源物理模块是 "可行的",可以广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viability Analysis of the Development of STEM-Integrated Module on Alternative Energy Topics
The study aims to determine the feasibility that STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics. The method used in this research is Research and Development with a 4D development model (Four-D Models). The validity test was conducted by two lecturers of the Master of Physics Education at the Indonesian University of Education and one physics teacher at a senior high school in Karawang. Readability test conducted by 7 students of grade x. The instruments used are material conformity instruments with STEM aspects, teaching material feasibility test instruments, and student readability sheets. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the STEM-based physics module on the topic of alternative energy developed is feasible because it obtains valid criteria in each validation category, including the component of material suitability with STEM, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. In the feasibility component of teaching materials (modules), 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the presentation component, 0.79 is categorized as Valid. In the linguistic component, 0.8 is categorized as Valid. Meanwhile, the readability test results conducted were at a high criterion of 86.43%. Thus, the development of STEM-based physics modules on alternative energy topics is "feasible" to be widely applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信