芬兰课程改革背景下图书馆员和教师的多元文学观念

Siinamari Ylivuori, Anu Ojaranta
{"title":"芬兰课程改革背景下图书馆员和教师的多元文学观念","authors":"Siinamari Ylivuori, Anu Ojaranta","doi":"10.47989/ir284506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe how the concept of multiliteracies is interpreted by teachers and librarians. Method. Two qualitative research projects involving teachers’ and librarians’ interviews are combined in this study. Individual and group interviews are analysed to explore the conceptions of teachers and librarians on multiliteracies. Analysis. Interviews are analysed using an inductive approach. Data categorisation is discussed and decided by both authors together. Results. The results indicate that there are differences in conceptualising multiliteracies and in the confidence in defining the concept between teachers and librarians. In addition, the concept of multiliteracies is seen as both a skills set and a pedagogical tool. Conclusions. There is a need for conceptual clarification of multiliteracies both in grassroots-level work and in the curriculum context to avoid multiple interpretations of the concept and to guide how multiliteracies could be pedagogically implemented.","PeriodicalId":509289,"journal":{"name":"Information Research an international electronic journal","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Librarians’ and teachers’ conceptions of multiliteracies in the context of Finnish curriculum reform\",\"authors\":\"Siinamari Ylivuori, Anu Ojaranta\",\"doi\":\"10.47989/ir284506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe how the concept of multiliteracies is interpreted by teachers and librarians. Method. Two qualitative research projects involving teachers’ and librarians’ interviews are combined in this study. Individual and group interviews are analysed to explore the conceptions of teachers and librarians on multiliteracies. Analysis. Interviews are analysed using an inductive approach. Data categorisation is discussed and decided by both authors together. Results. The results indicate that there are differences in conceptualising multiliteracies and in the confidence in defining the concept between teachers and librarians. In addition, the concept of multiliteracies is seen as both a skills set and a pedagogical tool. Conclusions. There is a need for conceptual clarification of multiliteracies both in grassroots-level work and in the curriculum context to avoid multiple interpretations of the concept and to guide how multiliteracies could be pedagogically implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Research an international electronic journal\",\"volume\":\"59 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Research an international electronic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Research an international electronic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/ir284506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。本研究的目的是描述教师和图书馆员如何解释多元文学的概念。研究方法。本研究结合了两个定性研究项目,分别涉及教师和图书馆员的访谈。通过分析个人访谈和小组访谈,探讨教师和图书馆员对多元文 化的概念。分析。采用归纳法对访谈进行分析。数据分类由两位作者共同讨论决定。结果。结果表明,教师和图书馆员对多元文盲概念的理解存在差异,对定义这一概念的信心也不尽相同。此外,多元文 化的概念既被视为一套技能,也被视为一种教学工具。结论。无论是在基层工作中还是在课程设置中,都有必要澄清多文 化的概念,以避免对这一概念的多重解释,并指导如何在教学中实施多文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Librarians’ and teachers’ conceptions of multiliteracies in the context of Finnish curriculum reform
Introduction. The aim of this study is to describe how the concept of multiliteracies is interpreted by teachers and librarians. Method. Two qualitative research projects involving teachers’ and librarians’ interviews are combined in this study. Individual and group interviews are analysed to explore the conceptions of teachers and librarians on multiliteracies. Analysis. Interviews are analysed using an inductive approach. Data categorisation is discussed and decided by both authors together. Results. The results indicate that there are differences in conceptualising multiliteracies and in the confidence in defining the concept between teachers and librarians. In addition, the concept of multiliteracies is seen as both a skills set and a pedagogical tool. Conclusions. There is a need for conceptual clarification of multiliteracies both in grassroots-level work and in the curriculum context to avoid multiple interpretations of the concept and to guide how multiliteracies could be pedagogically implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信