美国临时农业工人的 Covid-19 疾病负担、疫苗接种率和工作场所疾病预防工作

Bethany Boggess, Hannah Thomas, Josue Ruiz, Nicandro Mandujano-Acevedo, Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz
{"title":"美国临时农业工人的 Covid-19 疾病负担、疫苗接种率和工作场所疾病预防工作","authors":"Bethany Boggess, Hannah Thomas, Josue Ruiz, Nicandro Mandujano-Acevedo, Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz","doi":"10.21149/14856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To compare Covid-19 risk factors, self-reported Covid-19 testing and infection, and Covid-19 vaccination among H-2A workers and agricultural workers without H-2A visas. Materials and methods. Farmworkers completed surveys at randomly selected sites in five U.S. states from March – August 2022. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted for key characteristics and outcomes. Results. A total of 532 H-2A workers and 748 non-H-2A workers participated in the surveys. H-2A workers had significantly higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers (94.7 vs. 65.9%). More than one in four H-2A workers (29.6%) continued working while ill or positive with Covid-19. Fewer H-2A than non-H-2A workers reported receiving a Covid-19 test (51.5 vs. 59.2%, respectively) and a positive test result for Covid-19 (24.5 vs. 44.9% among those tested). Conclusions. Although H-2A workers had a lower self-reported prevalence of Covid-19 and higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers, findings such as reporting to work while ill or positive for Covid-19 indicate areas for improvement by binational public health leaders.","PeriodicalId":503276,"journal":{"name":"Salud Pública de México","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 disease burden, vaccine uptake, and workplace disease prevention efforts in temporary agricultural workers in the US\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Boggess, Hannah Thomas, Josue Ruiz, Nicandro Mandujano-Acevedo, Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz\",\"doi\":\"10.21149/14856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To compare Covid-19 risk factors, self-reported Covid-19 testing and infection, and Covid-19 vaccination among H-2A workers and agricultural workers without H-2A visas. Materials and methods. Farmworkers completed surveys at randomly selected sites in five U.S. states from March – August 2022. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted for key characteristics and outcomes. Results. A total of 532 H-2A workers and 748 non-H-2A workers participated in the surveys. H-2A workers had significantly higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers (94.7 vs. 65.9%). More than one in four H-2A workers (29.6%) continued working while ill or positive with Covid-19. Fewer H-2A than non-H-2A workers reported receiving a Covid-19 test (51.5 vs. 59.2%, respectively) and a positive test result for Covid-19 (24.5 vs. 44.9% among those tested). Conclusions. Although H-2A workers had a lower self-reported prevalence of Covid-19 and higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers, findings such as reporting to work while ill or positive for Covid-19 indicate areas for improvement by binational public health leaders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salud Pública de México\",\"volume\":\"187 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salud Pública de México\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21149/14856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Pública de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21149/14856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较 H-2A 工人和无 H-2A 签证的农业工人的 Covid-19 风险因素、自我报告的 Covid-19 检测和感染情况以及 Covid-19 疫苗接种情况。材料和方法。2022 年 3 月至 8 月期间,农民工在美国五个州随机选择的地点完成了调查。对主要特征和结果进行了描述性统计和双变量分析。结果。共有 532 名 H-2A 工人和 748 名非 H-2A 工人参与了调查。H-2A工人的Covid-19初级疫苗接种率明显高于非H-2A工人(94.7%对65.9%)。超过四分之一的 H-2A 工人(29.6%)在患病或 Covid-19 阳性期间继续工作。报告接受过 Covid-19 检测(分别为 51.5% 对 59.2%)和 Covid-19 检测结果呈阳性(24.5% 对 44.9%)的 H-2A 工人少于非 H-2A 工人。结论。尽管与非 H-2A 工人相比,H-2A 工人自我报告的 Covid-19 感染率较低,Covid-19 初次疫苗接种率较高,但诸如带病上班或 Covid-19 阳性等发现表明两国公共卫生领导者需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid-19 disease burden, vaccine uptake, and workplace disease prevention efforts in temporary agricultural workers in the US
Objective. To compare Covid-19 risk factors, self-reported Covid-19 testing and infection, and Covid-19 vaccination among H-2A workers and agricultural workers without H-2A visas. Materials and methods. Farmworkers completed surveys at randomly selected sites in five U.S. states from March – August 2022. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted for key characteristics and outcomes. Results. A total of 532 H-2A workers and 748 non-H-2A workers participated in the surveys. H-2A workers had significantly higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers (94.7 vs. 65.9%). More than one in four H-2A workers (29.6%) continued working while ill or positive with Covid-19. Fewer H-2A than non-H-2A workers reported receiving a Covid-19 test (51.5 vs. 59.2%, respectively) and a positive test result for Covid-19 (24.5 vs. 44.9% among those tested). Conclusions. Although H-2A workers had a lower self-reported prevalence of Covid-19 and higher Covid-19 primary vaccine series uptake than non-H-2A workers, findings such as reporting to work while ill or positive for Covid-19 indicate areas for improvement by binational public health leaders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信