法官在欧洲认罪求情协议程序中的作用:三种模式比较

Ali Emrah Bozbayındır
{"title":"法官在欧洲认罪求情协议程序中的作用:三种模式比较","authors":"Ali Emrah Bozbayındır","doi":"10.1177/13657127231217773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of the judge in ‘prosecutor-centred’, ‘law-centred’ and ‘judge-centred’ models of plea bargaining in the European context. A comprehensive study regarding the judicial role in plea bargaining is necessary, since the principle of double control has frequently been neglected in negotiated case dispositions, and in the literature it has often been suggested that more robust judicial control of plea bargaining should be in place. Instead of a pan-European overview, our article focuses on the different models of plea bargaining, particularly in the example of the Swiss abbreviated proceedings, the German confession bargaining and the English sentence discount. In order to put the judge's role into context, the article first introduces the contours of each model before analysing the role of the judge in these proceedings. In conclusion, the article compares the models discussed, which would provide a baseline for assessing the judicial role in plea bargaining.","PeriodicalId":227262,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","volume":"39 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures: Three models compared\",\"authors\":\"Ali Emrah Bozbayındır\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13657127231217773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the role of the judge in ‘prosecutor-centred’, ‘law-centred’ and ‘judge-centred’ models of plea bargaining in the European context. A comprehensive study regarding the judicial role in plea bargaining is necessary, since the principle of double control has frequently been neglected in negotiated case dispositions, and in the literature it has often been suggested that more robust judicial control of plea bargaining should be in place. Instead of a pan-European overview, our article focuses on the different models of plea bargaining, particularly in the example of the Swiss abbreviated proceedings, the German confession bargaining and the English sentence discount. In order to put the judge's role into context, the article first introduces the contours of each model before analysing the role of the judge in these proceedings. In conclusion, the article compares the models discussed, which would provide a baseline for assessing the judicial role in plea bargaining.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231217773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231217773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了法官在欧洲 "以检察官为中心"、"以法律为中心 "和 "以法官为中心 "的认罪求情协议模式中的作用。有必要对认罪求情协议中的司法角色进行全面研究,因为双重控制原则在协商处理案件中经常被忽视,而且文献中经常建议应对认罪求情协议进行更有力的司法控制。我们这篇文章并没有对全欧洲的情况进行综述,而是将重点放在辩诉交易的不同模式上,特别是以瑞士的简略程序、德国的供述交易和英国的刑期折扣为例。为了将法官的角色与背景联系起来,文章首先介绍了每种模式的轮廓,然后分析了法官在这些程序中的角色。最后,文章对所讨论的模式进行了比较,这将为评估认罪求情协议中的司法角色提供一个基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures: Three models compared
This article examines the role of the judge in ‘prosecutor-centred’, ‘law-centred’ and ‘judge-centred’ models of plea bargaining in the European context. A comprehensive study regarding the judicial role in plea bargaining is necessary, since the principle of double control has frequently been neglected in negotiated case dispositions, and in the literature it has often been suggested that more robust judicial control of plea bargaining should be in place. Instead of a pan-European overview, our article focuses on the different models of plea bargaining, particularly in the example of the Swiss abbreviated proceedings, the German confession bargaining and the English sentence discount. In order to put the judge's role into context, the article first introduces the contours of each model before analysing the role of the judge in these proceedings. In conclusion, the article compares the models discussed, which would provide a baseline for assessing the judicial role in plea bargaining.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信