基于功能态度理论,功利动机和信任如何增强使用意向

Q4 Decision Sciences
Endy Gunanto Marsasi, Albari Albari, Muchsin Muthohar
{"title":"基于功能态度理论,功利动机和信任如何增强使用意向","authors":"Endy Gunanto Marsasi, Albari Albari, Muchsin Muthohar","doi":"10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to determine consumers' motivations for using banking and their characteristics as users of banking products and gender.   Theoretical Framework: The conceptual framework for this study was formulated through a comprehensive review of the existing literature. This research shows that trust and ideal self-concept have an impact on consumer motivation. Furthermore, gender and banking product category moderate this relationship.   Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a quantitative approach. Purposive sampling was used and tested using structural equation modeling on 295 respondents.   Findings: This study shows that utilitarian motivation as a core variable influences ideal self-concept and trust. Thus, the intention to adopt banking products is influenced by the independent variables. In addition, this study found a correlation between multigroup analysis and consumer characteristics, including gender and savings type.   Research, Practical & Social implications: The results of this study indicate that subjective well-being negatively affects the intention to use banking products. Thus, further research is expected to use multigroup, single-double consumers for banking products. Companies should use the extensive data systems available and collaborate by interacting directly with consumers regarding what they need and complain about. These answers from consumers can be used by companies to improve their motivation and well-being.   Originality/Value: This study tested multiple groups to identify gender differences and the type of banking products consumers use as control variables.","PeriodicalId":31480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","volume":"115 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Utilitarian Motivation and Trust Can Increase Intention to Use Based on Functional Attitude Theory\",\"authors\":\"Endy Gunanto Marsasi, Albari Albari, Muchsin Muthohar\",\"doi\":\"10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aims to determine consumers' motivations for using banking and their characteristics as users of banking products and gender.   Theoretical Framework: The conceptual framework for this study was formulated through a comprehensive review of the existing literature. This research shows that trust and ideal self-concept have an impact on consumer motivation. Furthermore, gender and banking product category moderate this relationship.   Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a quantitative approach. Purposive sampling was used and tested using structural equation modeling on 295 respondents.   Findings: This study shows that utilitarian motivation as a core variable influences ideal self-concept and trust. Thus, the intention to adopt banking products is influenced by the independent variables. In addition, this study found a correlation between multigroup analysis and consumer characteristics, including gender and savings type.   Research, Practical & Social implications: The results of this study indicate that subjective well-being negatively affects the intention to use banking products. Thus, further research is expected to use multigroup, single-double consumers for banking products. Companies should use the extensive data systems available and collaborate by interacting directly with consumers regarding what they need and complain about. These answers from consumers can be used by companies to improve their motivation and well-being.   Originality/Value: This study tested multiple groups to identify gender differences and the type of banking products consumers use as control variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Professional Business Review\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Professional Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定消费者使用银行业务的动机及其作为银行产品用户的特征和性别。 理论框架:本研究的概念框架是通过对现有文献的全面回顾而形成的。研究表明,信任和理想自我概念对消费者的动机有影响。此外,性别和银行产品类别也会调节这种关系。 设计/方法/途径:本研究采用定量方法。采用了有目的的抽样,并对 295 名受访者进行了结构方程建模测试。 研究结果本研究表明,作为核心变量的功利性动机会影响理想自我概念和信任。因此,采用银行产品的意向受到自变量的影响。此外,本研究还发现了多组分析与消费者特征(包括性别和储蓄类型)之间的相关性。 研究、实践和社会意义:本研究结果表明,主观幸福感会对使用银行产品的意愿产生负面影响。因此,希望进一步的研究能使用多组、单双消费者来研究银行产品。公司应利用现有的广泛数据系统,通过与消费者直接互动,了解他们的需求和抱怨,从而开展合作。公司可以利用消费者的这些回答来提高他们的积极性和幸福感。 原创性/价值:本研究对多个群体进行了测试,以确定性别差异和消费者使用的银行产品类型作为控制变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Utilitarian Motivation and Trust Can Increase Intention to Use Based on Functional Attitude Theory
Purpose: This study aims to determine consumers' motivations for using banking and their characteristics as users of banking products and gender.   Theoretical Framework: The conceptual framework for this study was formulated through a comprehensive review of the existing literature. This research shows that trust and ideal self-concept have an impact on consumer motivation. Furthermore, gender and banking product category moderate this relationship.   Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used a quantitative approach. Purposive sampling was used and tested using structural equation modeling on 295 respondents.   Findings: This study shows that utilitarian motivation as a core variable influences ideal self-concept and trust. Thus, the intention to adopt banking products is influenced by the independent variables. In addition, this study found a correlation between multigroup analysis and consumer characteristics, including gender and savings type.   Research, Practical & Social implications: The results of this study indicate that subjective well-being negatively affects the intention to use banking products. Thus, further research is expected to use multigroup, single-double consumers for banking products. Companies should use the extensive data systems available and collaborate by interacting directly with consumers regarding what they need and complain about. These answers from consumers can be used by companies to improve their motivation and well-being.   Originality/Value: This study tested multiple groups to identify gender differences and the type of banking products consumers use as control variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Professional Business Review
International Journal of Professional Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信