教师对学生学习策略的了解:建议与评价

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Granström, Eliis Härma, Eve Kikas
{"title":"教师对学生学习策略的了解:建议与评价","authors":"M. Granström, Eliis Härma, Eve Kikas","doi":"10.23865/nse.v43.5501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research was to identify which learning strategies pre and in-service teachers (N = 340) recommend to students in two hypothetical learning situations, in order to examine how teachers evaluate students’ learning strategies, and to study relations between recommendations and evaluations. Among the recommended and evaluated learning strategies, four tapped deep learning, and two tapped surface learning. Results showed that teachers mainly recommended either deep-learning strategies or a combination of deep and surface-learning strategies. Teachers gave better evaluations of deep-learning strategies compared to surface-learning strategies. Differences in evaluations of surface-learning strategies and interleaving were found between teachers who recommended only deep-learning strategies and those who recommended both types of strategies.","PeriodicalId":38767,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ Knowledge of Students’ Learning Strategies: Recommendations and Evaluations\",\"authors\":\"M. Granström, Eliis Härma, Eve Kikas\",\"doi\":\"10.23865/nse.v43.5501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research was to identify which learning strategies pre and in-service teachers (N = 340) recommend to students in two hypothetical learning situations, in order to examine how teachers evaluate students’ learning strategies, and to study relations between recommendations and evaluations. Among the recommended and evaluated learning strategies, four tapped deep learning, and two tapped surface learning. Results showed that teachers mainly recommended either deep-learning strategies or a combination of deep and surface-learning strategies. Teachers gave better evaluations of deep-learning strategies compared to surface-learning strategies. Differences in evaluations of surface-learning strategies and interleaving were found between teachers who recommended only deep-learning strategies and those who recommended both types of strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Studies in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v43.5501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v43.5501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定职前和在职教师(人数=340)在两种假设的学习情境中向学生推荐哪些学习策略,以考察教师如何评价学生的学习策略,并研究推荐与评价之间的关系。在推荐和评价的学习策略中,有四种涉及深度学习,两种涉及表层学习。结果显示,教师主要推荐深度学习策略或深度学习策略与表层学习策略相结合的学习策略。与表层学习策略相比,教师对深度学习策略的评价更好。只推荐深度学习策略的教师和同时推荐两种策略的教师对表层学习策略和交错学习策略的评价存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ Knowledge of Students’ Learning Strategies: Recommendations and Evaluations
The objective of this research was to identify which learning strategies pre and in-service teachers (N = 340) recommend to students in two hypothetical learning situations, in order to examine how teachers evaluate students’ learning strategies, and to study relations between recommendations and evaluations. Among the recommended and evaluated learning strategies, four tapped deep learning, and two tapped surface learning. Results showed that teachers mainly recommended either deep-learning strategies or a combination of deep and surface-learning strategies. Teachers gave better evaluations of deep-learning strategies compared to surface-learning strategies. Differences in evaluations of surface-learning strategies and interleaving were found between teachers who recommended only deep-learning strategies and those who recommended both types of strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Education
Nordic Studies in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信