乌克兰婚姻法时期地方政府机构运作的特点

Vitaliy Kovalchuk
{"title":"乌克兰婚姻法时期地方政府机构运作的特点","authors":"Vitaliy Kovalchuk","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The article comprehensively theorizes and analyzes the unique aspects of legal regulations governing the operations of local self-government bodies during Ukraine's period of martial law. It presents specific proposals aimed at enhancing the legislation that oversees this sphere of power and legal relations. The article emphasizes the critical role of local self-government bodies during times of conflict, highlighting their continued significance as a crucial mechanism in upholding the efficient functioning of public authority and the state's defense capabilities. This was vividly demonstrated through the actions of local self-government bodies in response to the Russian Federation's large-scale invasion of Ukraine. They were tasked with establishing voluntary territorial community formations as per the Law of Ukraine \"On the Foundations of National Resistance.\" This involved creating checkpoints, protective structures, and facilitating conditions for the effective functioning of volunteer units. In regions without direct hostilities, these bodies actively engaged in volunteer work and providing support to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Numerous instances exist where these bodies either spearheaded or significantly contributed to volunteer initiatives at the community level. According to the author, the experience gained by Ukraine during the war demonstrates the undeniable advantage of self-organization of the population over centralized management. The central government will not be able to take over the functions of local self-government bodies and perform them as effectively. Even before the war, the level of trust in local authorities among citizens was one of the highest compared to other institutions. With increasing interaction between people and their local government, this trust has only strengthened. Hence, the proposal to dissolve or arbitrarily limit the powers of local self-government bodies during wartime is considered unconstitutional and a threat to the country's national security. Termination or limitation of their powers is possible only in extraordinary cases, when there is a direct threat to the life and safety of citizens who are in the territory of hostilities or occupation. In all other cases, such actions should only be possible following a well-justified court decision. It's crucial to recognize that local self-government holds the same constitutional significance as the state's structure. The Constitution of Ukraine explicitly outlines the status of local self-government bodies, in particular their functions and powers, which they perform in peaceful conditions. Therefore, making amendments to the Constitution regarding the functioning of local self-government seems unfeasible. The functioning of local self-government during the war requires additional legislative regulation. Consequently, the Law of Ukraine \"On Adopting Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding the Functioning of the Civil Service and Local Self-Government during the Period of Martial Law\" was enacted, incorporating significant amendments into the Laws \"On Local Self-Government in Ukraine\" and \"On the Legal Regime of Martial Law\". The latest legislative act is of particular importance for the constitutional legal order, essentially acting as an addition to the Constitution of Ukraine, the effect of which is actualized in the period of wars.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feautures of the functioning of local government bodies during the period of marital law in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Vitaliy Kovalchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.40.398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The article comprehensively theorizes and analyzes the unique aspects of legal regulations governing the operations of local self-government bodies during Ukraine's period of martial law. It presents specific proposals aimed at enhancing the legislation that oversees this sphere of power and legal relations. The article emphasizes the critical role of local self-government bodies during times of conflict, highlighting their continued significance as a crucial mechanism in upholding the efficient functioning of public authority and the state's defense capabilities. This was vividly demonstrated through the actions of local self-government bodies in response to the Russian Federation's large-scale invasion of Ukraine. They were tasked with establishing voluntary territorial community formations as per the Law of Ukraine \\\"On the Foundations of National Resistance.\\\" This involved creating checkpoints, protective structures, and facilitating conditions for the effective functioning of volunteer units. In regions without direct hostilities, these bodies actively engaged in volunteer work and providing support to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Numerous instances exist where these bodies either spearheaded or significantly contributed to volunteer initiatives at the community level. According to the author, the experience gained by Ukraine during the war demonstrates the undeniable advantage of self-organization of the population over centralized management. The central government will not be able to take over the functions of local self-government bodies and perform them as effectively. Even before the war, the level of trust in local authorities among citizens was one of the highest compared to other institutions. With increasing interaction between people and their local government, this trust has only strengthened. Hence, the proposal to dissolve or arbitrarily limit the powers of local self-government bodies during wartime is considered unconstitutional and a threat to the country's national security. Termination or limitation of their powers is possible only in extraordinary cases, when there is a direct threat to the life and safety of citizens who are in the territory of hostilities or occupation. In all other cases, such actions should only be possible following a well-justified court decision. It's crucial to recognize that local self-government holds the same constitutional significance as the state's structure. The Constitution of Ukraine explicitly outlines the status of local self-government bodies, in particular their functions and powers, which they perform in peaceful conditions. Therefore, making amendments to the Constitution regarding the functioning of local self-government seems unfeasible. The functioning of local self-government during the war requires additional legislative regulation. Consequently, the Law of Ukraine \\\"On Adopting Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding the Functioning of the Civil Service and Local Self-Government during the Period of Martial Law\\\" was enacted, incorporating significant amendments into the Laws \\\"On Local Self-Government in Ukraine\\\" and \\\"On the Legal Regime of Martial Law\\\". The latest legislative act is of particular importance for the constitutional legal order, essentially acting as an addition to the Constitution of Ukraine, the effect of which is actualized in the period of wars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要文章对乌克兰戒严时期有关地方自治机构运作的法律规定的独特方面进行了全面的理论分析。文章提出了旨在加强监督这一权力领域和法律关系的立法的具体建议。文章强调了地方自治机构在冲突时期的关键作用,突出了其作为维护公共权力有效运作和国家国防能力的重要机制的持续重要性。地方自治机构应对俄罗斯联邦大规模入侵乌克兰的行动生动地证明了这一点。根据乌克兰 "关于民族抵抗基础 "的法律,他们的任务是建立自愿的领土社区组织。这包括建立检查站、保护结构,以及为志愿部队的有效运作提供便利条件。在没有直接敌对行动的地区,这些机构积极开展志愿工作,为乌克兰武装部队提供支持。这些机构在社区一级带头开展志愿行动或为志愿行动做出重大贡献的事例不胜枚举。作者认为,乌克兰在战争期间获得的经验表明,与中央管理相比,民众自我组织具有无可否认的优势。中央政府无法接管地方自治机构的职能并有效履行这些职能。即使在战前,公民对地方当局的信任程度也是其他机构中最高的。随着人民与地方政府之间的互动日益频繁,这种信任也在不断加强。因此,在战时解散或任意限制地方自治机构权力的建议被认为是违宪的,是对国家安全的威胁。只有在特殊情况下,当处于敌对行动或占领区的公民的生命和安全受到直接威胁时,才有可能终止或限制其权力。在所有其他情况下,只有在法院做出理由充分的裁决后,才有可能采取此类行动。必须认识到,地方自治与国家结构具有相同的宪法意义。乌克兰宪法》明确规定了地方自治机构的地位,特别是其在和平条件下履行的职能和权力。因此,就地方自治机构的职能对《宪法》进行修改似乎是不可行的。战争期间地方自治机构的运作需要额外的立法规范。因此,乌克兰颁布了《关于对乌克兰戒严期间公务员制度和地方自治运作的若干法律进行修改的法律》,对《乌克兰地方自治法》和《戒严法律制度法》进行了重大修改。最新的立法对宪法法律秩序具有特别重要的意义,基本上是对《乌克兰宪法》的补充,其效力在战争时期得以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feautures of the functioning of local government bodies during the period of marital law in Ukraine
Abstract. The article comprehensively theorizes and analyzes the unique aspects of legal regulations governing the operations of local self-government bodies during Ukraine's period of martial law. It presents specific proposals aimed at enhancing the legislation that oversees this sphere of power and legal relations. The article emphasizes the critical role of local self-government bodies during times of conflict, highlighting their continued significance as a crucial mechanism in upholding the efficient functioning of public authority and the state's defense capabilities. This was vividly demonstrated through the actions of local self-government bodies in response to the Russian Federation's large-scale invasion of Ukraine. They were tasked with establishing voluntary territorial community formations as per the Law of Ukraine "On the Foundations of National Resistance." This involved creating checkpoints, protective structures, and facilitating conditions for the effective functioning of volunteer units. In regions without direct hostilities, these bodies actively engaged in volunteer work and providing support to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Numerous instances exist where these bodies either spearheaded or significantly contributed to volunteer initiatives at the community level. According to the author, the experience gained by Ukraine during the war demonstrates the undeniable advantage of self-organization of the population over centralized management. The central government will not be able to take over the functions of local self-government bodies and perform them as effectively. Even before the war, the level of trust in local authorities among citizens was one of the highest compared to other institutions. With increasing interaction between people and their local government, this trust has only strengthened. Hence, the proposal to dissolve or arbitrarily limit the powers of local self-government bodies during wartime is considered unconstitutional and a threat to the country's national security. Termination or limitation of their powers is possible only in extraordinary cases, when there is a direct threat to the life and safety of citizens who are in the territory of hostilities or occupation. In all other cases, such actions should only be possible following a well-justified court decision. It's crucial to recognize that local self-government holds the same constitutional significance as the state's structure. The Constitution of Ukraine explicitly outlines the status of local self-government bodies, in particular their functions and powers, which they perform in peaceful conditions. Therefore, making amendments to the Constitution regarding the functioning of local self-government seems unfeasible. The functioning of local self-government during the war requires additional legislative regulation. Consequently, the Law of Ukraine "On Adopting Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding the Functioning of the Civil Service and Local Self-Government during the Period of Martial Law" was enacted, incorporating significant amendments into the Laws "On Local Self-Government in Ukraine" and "On the Legal Regime of Martial Law". The latest legislative act is of particular importance for the constitutional legal order, essentially acting as an addition to the Constitution of Ukraine, the effect of which is actualized in the period of wars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信