{"title":"关于发散序列的矛盾行为","authors":"K. L. Verma","doi":"10.56947/amcs.v19.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents some considerations on summation method on infinite divergent series. Irrefutably divergent series don’t have a sum in the traditional logic of the term. However there are extensions, where transformed definitions apportion changed values to the same divergent series and they rarely have agreeable properties. Particularly, at beginning and manipulating these instinctively, it easily comes across nasty paradoxes. In this article for any odd prime p, the divergent series and on using this representation for further leads to a paradoxical bewildering novel formula which evidently contradicts the basic principles of arithmetic and the definition of a divergent series identical to Ramanujan paradox. Illustrations to support this illogicality result are discussed analytically and demonstrated graphically.","PeriodicalId":504658,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Mathematics and Computer Science","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the paradoxical behavior of divergent series\",\"authors\":\"K. L. Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.56947/amcs.v19.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents some considerations on summation method on infinite divergent series. Irrefutably divergent series don’t have a sum in the traditional logic of the term. However there are extensions, where transformed definitions apportion changed values to the same divergent series and they rarely have agreeable properties. Particularly, at beginning and manipulating these instinctively, it easily comes across nasty paradoxes. In this article for any odd prime p, the divergent series and on using this representation for further leads to a paradoxical bewildering novel formula which evidently contradicts the basic principles of arithmetic and the definition of a divergent series identical to Ramanujan paradox. Illustrations to support this illogicality result are discussed analytically and demonstrated graphically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Mathematics and Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Mathematics and Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56947/amcs.v19.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Mathematics and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56947/amcs.v19.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper presents some considerations on summation method on infinite divergent series. Irrefutably divergent series don’t have a sum in the traditional logic of the term. However there are extensions, where transformed definitions apportion changed values to the same divergent series and they rarely have agreeable properties. Particularly, at beginning and manipulating these instinctively, it easily comes across nasty paradoxes. In this article for any odd prime p, the divergent series and on using this representation for further leads to a paradoxical bewildering novel formula which evidently contradicts the basic principles of arithmetic and the definition of a divergent series identical to Ramanujan paradox. Illustrations to support this illogicality result are discussed analytically and demonstrated graphically.