通过 16s rRNA 测序比较不明原因不孕患者和生育患者的子宫内膜微生物群结果

Gonca Ozten Dere, Cagman Tan, S. Mumusoglu, Pınar Zarakolu, G. Bozdag
{"title":"通过 16s rRNA 测序比较不明原因不孕患者和生育患者的子宫内膜微生物群结果","authors":"Gonca Ozten Dere, Cagman Tan, S. Mumusoglu, Pınar Zarakolu, G. Bozdag","doi":"10.21613/gorm.2023.1452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to compare the endometrial microbiota profiles of women with unexplained infertility and fertile women. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 15 patients with unexplained infertility and 15 patients who had a live birth in the last two years with proven fertility were recruited. Endometrial samples were collected and analyzed through next-generation sequencing of the bacteria-specific 16S ribosome gene. RESULTS: Lactobacillus species represented the majority of the microbiome profile in both groups. The median percentage of the endometrial Lactobacillus between infertile patients and fertile patients was not statistically significant (p=0.9). Groups were divided into two categories: Lactobasillus dominant (Lactobacillus spp.> 90%, LD) and Non-Lactobasillus dominant (NLD). Lactobacillus dominance was detected in six of nine patients (66.7%) in the study group and four of nine patients (44.5%) in the control group, and no significant difference was observed between them (p=0.64). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, no significant difference was observed between the endometrial microbiota profile of infertile and fertile patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to characterize the endometrial microbiota and its impact on reproduction.Keywords: Microbiota, unexplained infertility, endometrial microbiota","PeriodicalId":507263,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine","volume":"13 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Endometrial Microbiota Results Between Patients with Unexplained Infertility and Fertile Patients through 16s rRNA Sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Gonca Ozten Dere, Cagman Tan, S. Mumusoglu, Pınar Zarakolu, G. Bozdag\",\"doi\":\"10.21613/gorm.2023.1452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to compare the endometrial microbiota profiles of women with unexplained infertility and fertile women. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 15 patients with unexplained infertility and 15 patients who had a live birth in the last two years with proven fertility were recruited. Endometrial samples were collected and analyzed through next-generation sequencing of the bacteria-specific 16S ribosome gene. RESULTS: Lactobacillus species represented the majority of the microbiome profile in both groups. The median percentage of the endometrial Lactobacillus between infertile patients and fertile patients was not statistically significant (p=0.9). Groups were divided into two categories: Lactobasillus dominant (Lactobacillus spp.> 90%, LD) and Non-Lactobasillus dominant (NLD). Lactobacillus dominance was detected in six of nine patients (66.7%) in the study group and four of nine patients (44.5%) in the control group, and no significant difference was observed between them (p=0.64). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, no significant difference was observed between the endometrial microbiota profile of infertile and fertile patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to characterize the endometrial microbiota and its impact on reproduction.Keywords: Microbiota, unexplained infertility, endometrial microbiota\",\"PeriodicalId\":507263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21613/gorm.2023.1452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21613/gorm.2023.1452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究的主要目的是比较不明原因不孕症女性和生育女性的子宫内膜微生物群谱。研究设计:共招募了 15 名原因不明的不孕症患者和 15 名在过去两年中生育过活产且已证明具有生育能力的患者。采集子宫内膜样本并通过细菌特异性 16S 核糖体基因的新一代测序进行分析。 结果:乳酸杆菌在两组患者的微生物群谱中均占多数。不孕患者和可育患者子宫内膜乳酸杆菌的中位百分比无统计学意义(P=0.9)。各组分为两类:乳杆菌优势组(乳杆菌>90%,LD)和非乳杆菌优势组(NLD)。研究组 9 名患者中有 6 名(66.7%)检测到乳杆菌优势菌,对照组 9 名患者中有 4 名(44.5%)检测到非乳杆菌优势菌,两者之间无明显差异(P=0.64)。结论:根据我们的研究结果,未育和已育患者的子宫内膜微生物群谱无明显差异。需要进一步开展样本量更大的研究,以确定子宫内膜微生物群的特征及其对生殖的影响:微生物群 不明原因不孕症 子宫内膜微生物群
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Endometrial Microbiota Results Between Patients with Unexplained Infertility and Fertile Patients through 16s rRNA Sequencing
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to compare the endometrial microbiota profiles of women with unexplained infertility and fertile women. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 15 patients with unexplained infertility and 15 patients who had a live birth in the last two years with proven fertility were recruited. Endometrial samples were collected and analyzed through next-generation sequencing of the bacteria-specific 16S ribosome gene. RESULTS: Lactobacillus species represented the majority of the microbiome profile in both groups. The median percentage of the endometrial Lactobacillus between infertile patients and fertile patients was not statistically significant (p=0.9). Groups were divided into two categories: Lactobasillus dominant (Lactobacillus spp.> 90%, LD) and Non-Lactobasillus dominant (NLD). Lactobacillus dominance was detected in six of nine patients (66.7%) in the study group and four of nine patients (44.5%) in the control group, and no significant difference was observed between them (p=0.64). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, no significant difference was observed between the endometrial microbiota profile of infertile and fertile patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to characterize the endometrial microbiota and its impact on reproduction.Keywords: Microbiota, unexplained infertility, endometrial microbiota
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信