当前公共行政数字化的趋势

Olha Skochylias-Pavliv, Yulia Lishchynska
{"title":"当前公共行政数字化的趋势","authors":"Olha Skochylias-Pavliv, Yulia Lishchynska","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of modern trends in digitalization of public administration. In general, the tendency to transfer the sphere of public administration to a digital format is positively evaluated, because for citizens, digitalization simplifies communication with the authorities and eliminates corruption risks, and for the state, this process means optimization and transparency in activities. The experience of Germany in the field of digitization of public administration, which can become a reference point and standard for the further development of digitization in Ukraine, is considered. An important step in the field of digitalization of public administration is the introduction of the Custody Records system in Ukraine, which provides for the possibility of ensuring a detailed recording of all actions regarding a detained person. It was also emphasized that the introduction of the «Custody Records» system has a double purpose: firstly, to guarantee the proper treatment of detained persons, and secondly, to protect the rights of police officers, who are often unjustly accused of wrongful actions in relation to a detained person. At the same time, experts also emphasize the negative aspects of the system's functioning, such as the possibility of a violation of confidentiality when the detainee communicates with the lawyer, since such communication takes place through a transparent glass using a telephone and possible eavesdropping of the conversation. In addition, widespread video recording also does not contribute to the trust of the detained person in the defense and can be considered as an obstacle to the right to receive legal aid. Attention is drawn to the need for conducting exercises and trainings for human rights inspectors (Сustody Officer), who enter all data on the detained person into the electronic database. The implementation of the «Custody Records» system in all temporary detention facilities and police departments requires an increase in the number of such persons who must be properly familiar with the peculiarities of working with the system, since they are the main subjects of ensuring the standards of the rights of detained persons.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current trends of digitalization of public administration\",\"authors\":\"Olha Skochylias-Pavliv, Yulia Lishchynska\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.40.250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of modern trends in digitalization of public administration. In general, the tendency to transfer the sphere of public administration to a digital format is positively evaluated, because for citizens, digitalization simplifies communication with the authorities and eliminates corruption risks, and for the state, this process means optimization and transparency in activities. The experience of Germany in the field of digitization of public administration, which can become a reference point and standard for the further development of digitization in Ukraine, is considered. An important step in the field of digitalization of public administration is the introduction of the Custody Records system in Ukraine, which provides for the possibility of ensuring a detailed recording of all actions regarding a detained person. It was also emphasized that the introduction of the «Custody Records» system has a double purpose: firstly, to guarantee the proper treatment of detained persons, and secondly, to protect the rights of police officers, who are often unjustly accused of wrongful actions in relation to a detained person. At the same time, experts also emphasize the negative aspects of the system's functioning, such as the possibility of a violation of confidentiality when the detainee communicates with the lawyer, since such communication takes place through a transparent glass using a telephone and possible eavesdropping of the conversation. In addition, widespread video recording also does not contribute to the trust of the detained person in the defense and can be considered as an obstacle to the right to receive legal aid. Attention is drawn to the need for conducting exercises and trainings for human rights inspectors (Сustody Officer), who enter all data on the detained person into the electronic database. The implementation of the «Custody Records» system in all temporary detention facilities and police departments requires an increase in the number of such persons who must be properly familiar with the peculiarities of working with the system, since they are the main subjects of ensuring the standards of the rights of detained persons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于研究公共行政数字化的现代趋势。总体而言,将公共行政领域转移到数字化形式的趋势得到了积极评价,因为对公民而言,数字化简化了与当局的沟通并消除了腐败风险,而对国家而言,这一进程意味着活动的优化和透明。德国在公共行政数字化领域的经验可以成为乌克兰进一步发展数字化的参照点和标准。公共行政数字化领域的一个重要步骤是在乌克兰引入监管记录系统,该系统提供了确 保详细记录与被拘留者有关的所有行动的可能性。专家们还强调,引入 "监管记录 "系统有双重目的:首先是保证被拘留者得到适当的待 遇,其次是保护警察的权利,因为他们经常被不公正地指控对被拘留者采取了错误的行 动。与此同时,专家们也强调了该系统运作的负面影响,例如被拘留者与律师沟通时可能会违反保密原则,因为这种沟通是通过透明玻璃使用电话进行的,而且可能会窃听谈话内容。此外,大范围的录像也不利于被拘留者对辩护人的信任,可被视为获得法律援助权利的障碍。需要注意的是,有必要对人权监察员(监管官)进行培训和演练,将被拘留者的所有数据录入电子数据库。要在所有临时拘留所和警察局实施 "监管记录 "系统,就必须增加这些人员的数量,他们必须 适当熟悉该系统工作的特殊性,因为他们是确保被拘留者权利标准的主要主体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current trends of digitalization of public administration
The article is devoted to the study of modern trends in digitalization of public administration. In general, the tendency to transfer the sphere of public administration to a digital format is positively evaluated, because for citizens, digitalization simplifies communication with the authorities and eliminates corruption risks, and for the state, this process means optimization and transparency in activities. The experience of Germany in the field of digitization of public administration, which can become a reference point and standard for the further development of digitization in Ukraine, is considered. An important step in the field of digitalization of public administration is the introduction of the Custody Records system in Ukraine, which provides for the possibility of ensuring a detailed recording of all actions regarding a detained person. It was also emphasized that the introduction of the «Custody Records» system has a double purpose: firstly, to guarantee the proper treatment of detained persons, and secondly, to protect the rights of police officers, who are often unjustly accused of wrongful actions in relation to a detained person. At the same time, experts also emphasize the negative aspects of the system's functioning, such as the possibility of a violation of confidentiality when the detainee communicates with the lawyer, since such communication takes place through a transparent glass using a telephone and possible eavesdropping of the conversation. In addition, widespread video recording also does not contribute to the trust of the detained person in the defense and can be considered as an obstacle to the right to receive legal aid. Attention is drawn to the need for conducting exercises and trainings for human rights inspectors (Сustody Officer), who enter all data on the detained person into the electronic database. The implementation of the «Custody Records» system in all temporary detention facilities and police departments requires an increase in the number of such persons who must be properly familiar with the peculiarities of working with the system, since they are the main subjects of ensuring the standards of the rights of detained persons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信