比较使用关节镜打孔器、射频消融器和射频仪器 "半月板切除器 "进行半月板部分切除术的持续时间的实验研究

Bogdan Y. Gryshchuk, Ihor V. Boiko
{"title":"比较使用关节镜打孔器、射频消融器和射频仪器 \"半月板切除器 \"进行半月板部分切除术的持续时间的实验研究","authors":"Bogdan Y. Gryshchuk, Ihor V. Boiko","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. An experimental study comparing the duration of partial resection of 500 mm3 of meniscus by a combination of arthroscopic punchers with a radiofrequency ablator and a radiofrequency resection tool \"Meniscus Resector\" was conducted in isolated laboratory conditions. The aim of the study. To determine and compare the duration of partial meniscus resection using arthroscopic punchers, radiofrequency ablator and Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool in isolated laboratory conditions. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on 30 macropreparations of human knee menisci obtained during total knee arthroplasty, which were divided into two groups: Group 1 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using an arthroscopic biter, and the contours of the meniscus surface after resection were treated with a radiofrequency ablator; Group 2 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using the Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool. In both groups, the same volume of meniscus was resected – 500 mm3. Visualization and timing were performed using an arthroscopic system (Smith & Nephew, USA; Loran, China). Statistical processing of the study data was performed using the licensed software IBM SPSS Statistics Base v 22. MedCalc (Healthcare Technology, USA). Results and Discussion. In group 1, the mean duration (median, interquartile range) of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 11.8 (10.2-12.9) seconds, in group 2, the mean duration of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 1.9 (1.4-2.3) seconds (p=0.000061). Thus, the use of the Meniscus Resector (group 2) contributed to an average of 6.2 times faster partial meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablator (group 1). Conclusions. The study suggests that the use of the Meniscus Resector provides a faster method of radiofrequency meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablators. Further studies and trials are needed to confirm these results and evaluate safety in different clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":"72 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPERIMENTAL STUDY COMPARING THE DURATION OF PARTIAL MENISCUS RESECTION USING ARTHROSCOPIC PUNCHERS, RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATOR AND RADIOFREQUENCY INSTRUMENT FOR MENISCUS RESECTION \\\"MENISCUS RESECTOR\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Bogdan Y. Gryshchuk, Ihor V. Boiko\",\"doi\":\"10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. An experimental study comparing the duration of partial resection of 500 mm3 of meniscus by a combination of arthroscopic punchers with a radiofrequency ablator and a radiofrequency resection tool \\\"Meniscus Resector\\\" was conducted in isolated laboratory conditions. The aim of the study. To determine and compare the duration of partial meniscus resection using arthroscopic punchers, radiofrequency ablator and Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool in isolated laboratory conditions. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on 30 macropreparations of human knee menisci obtained during total knee arthroplasty, which were divided into two groups: Group 1 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using an arthroscopic biter, and the contours of the meniscus surface after resection were treated with a radiofrequency ablator; Group 2 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using the Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool. In both groups, the same volume of meniscus was resected – 500 mm3. Visualization and timing were performed using an arthroscopic system (Smith & Nephew, USA; Loran, China). Statistical processing of the study data was performed using the licensed software IBM SPSS Statistics Base v 22. MedCalc (Healthcare Technology, USA). Results and Discussion. In group 1, the mean duration (median, interquartile range) of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 11.8 (10.2-12.9) seconds, in group 2, the mean duration of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 1.9 (1.4-2.3) seconds (p=0.000061). Thus, the use of the Meniscus Resector (group 2) contributed to an average of 6.2 times faster partial meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablator (group 1). Conclusions. The study suggests that the use of the Meniscus Resector provides a faster method of radiofrequency meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablators. Further studies and trials are needed to confirm these results and evaluate safety in different clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介一项实验研究在独立的实验室条件下进行,比较了将关节镜打孔器与射频消融器和射频切除工具 "半月板切除器 "结合使用,部分切除 500 立方毫米半月板的持续时间。 研究目的确定并比较在实验室隔离条件下使用关节镜打孔器、射频消融器和 Meniscus Resector 射频切除工具进行半月板部分切除术的持续时间。 材料和方法。研究对象是在全膝关节置换术中获得的 30 个人类膝关节半月板大样本,分为两组:第 1 组--15 个宏观标本,使用关节镜咬合器进行部分切除,切除后的半月板表面轮廓使用射频消融器进行处理;第 2 组--15 个宏观标本,使用半月板切除器射频切除工具进行部分切除。两组切除的半月板体积相同,均为 500 立方毫米。使用关节镜系统(Smith & Nephew,美国;Loran,中国)进行观察和计时。研究数据的统计处理使用授权软件 IBM SPSS Statistics Base v 22 进行。MedCalc(美国医疗保健技术公司)。 结果与讨论在第一组中,500 立方毫米碎片部分切除的平均持续时间(中位数,四分位数间距)为 11.8(10.2-12.9)秒;在第二组中,500 立方毫米碎片部分切除的平均持续时间为 1.9(1.4-2.3)秒(P=0.000061)。因此,与关节镜打孔器和射频消融器(第1组)相比,使用半月板切除器(第2组)的半月板部分切除速度平均快6.2倍。 结论。研究表明,与关节镜打孔器和射频消融器相比,使用半月板分离器可提供更快的射频半月板切除方法。还需要进一步的研究和试验来证实这些结果,并评估在不同临床环境下的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY COMPARING THE DURATION OF PARTIAL MENISCUS RESECTION USING ARTHROSCOPIC PUNCHERS, RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATOR AND RADIOFREQUENCY INSTRUMENT FOR MENISCUS RESECTION "MENISCUS RESECTOR"
Introduction. An experimental study comparing the duration of partial resection of 500 mm3 of meniscus by a combination of arthroscopic punchers with a radiofrequency ablator and a radiofrequency resection tool "Meniscus Resector" was conducted in isolated laboratory conditions. The aim of the study. To determine and compare the duration of partial meniscus resection using arthroscopic punchers, radiofrequency ablator and Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool in isolated laboratory conditions. Materials and methods. The study was conducted on 30 macropreparations of human knee menisci obtained during total knee arthroplasty, which were divided into two groups: Group 1 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using an arthroscopic biter, and the contours of the meniscus surface after resection were treated with a radiofrequency ablator; Group 2 – 15 macroscopic specimens, partial resection of which was performed using the Meniscus Resector radiofrequency resection tool. In both groups, the same volume of meniscus was resected – 500 mm3. Visualization and timing were performed using an arthroscopic system (Smith & Nephew, USA; Loran, China). Statistical processing of the study data was performed using the licensed software IBM SPSS Statistics Base v 22. MedCalc (Healthcare Technology, USA). Results and Discussion. In group 1, the mean duration (median, interquartile range) of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 11.8 (10.2-12.9) seconds, in group 2, the mean duration of partial resection of a 500 mm3 fragment was 1.9 (1.4-2.3) seconds (p=0.000061). Thus, the use of the Meniscus Resector (group 2) contributed to an average of 6.2 times faster partial meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablator (group 1). Conclusions. The study suggests that the use of the Meniscus Resector provides a faster method of radiofrequency meniscus resection compared to arthroscopic punchers and radiofrequency ablators. Further studies and trials are needed to confirm these results and evaluate safety in different clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信