医院菜单的营养成分、碳足迹和水足迹之间的关系

Gizem Aytekin-Sahin, Aslıhan Beşparmak, Seda Sultan Sagir, Adeviye Somtas, Dilsad Ozturk
{"title":"医院菜单的营养成分、碳足迹和水足迹之间的关系","authors":"Gizem Aytekin-Sahin, Aslıhan Beşparmak, Seda Sultan Sagir, Adeviye Somtas, Dilsad Ozturk","doi":"10.1108/nfs-07-2023-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to evaluate the nutrient profile, carbon footprint and water footprint of one-month menus presented in five hospitals in Turkey and compare their environmental impacts with that of the Mediterranean diet. Design/methodology/approach The energy and nutrient content of menus were compared with recommendations of the Turkey Dietary Guidelines (TUBER) 2022. Nutrient profiles of hospital menus were evaluated using Nutrient Rich Food 9.3 (NRF 9.3) and SAIN-LIM models. The carbon and water footprints of the menus were calculated and compared with those of the Mediterranean diet. Findings Menus’ energy and nutrient content did not conform with TUBER 2022. The SAIN-LIM score of Hospital A (5.7 ± 1.1) was significantly higher than that of Hospitals C (4.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.001) and E (5.1 ± 0.7, p = 0.025). The carbon footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (2.6 ± 0.3 kg CO2 eq/person/day) and that of Hospital D (4 ± 0.9 kg CO2 eq/person/day) was significantly higher than those of others (p < 0.001). While other menus were similar (p > 0.05), the water footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (3.5 ± 0.7 L/kg, p < 0.001). In addition, if the menus were suitable for the Mediterranean diet, a reduction of 2.2–23.4% in the carbon footprint and 37.5–58.6% in the water footprint could be achieved. Moreover, menus’ carbon and water footprints were negatively correlated with NRF 9.3 and SAIN-LIM scores. Research limitations/implications The primary aim should be to ensure that the planned menus follow the dietary guidelines. In addition, it is an undeniable fact that sustainable nutrition is a complex process with many dimensions. However, it seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes to be made in food services. Practical implications It seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes. For both health and environmental impacts, food services should switch to menus suitable for the Mediterranean diet. Originality/value The findings provide new insights into hospital menus’ quality and environmental impact.","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","volume":"89 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between nutrient profiles, carbon footprint and water footprint of hospital menus\",\"authors\":\"Gizem Aytekin-Sahin, Aslıhan Beşparmak, Seda Sultan Sagir, Adeviye Somtas, Dilsad Ozturk\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/nfs-07-2023-0154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study aims to evaluate the nutrient profile, carbon footprint and water footprint of one-month menus presented in five hospitals in Turkey and compare their environmental impacts with that of the Mediterranean diet. Design/methodology/approach The energy and nutrient content of menus were compared with recommendations of the Turkey Dietary Guidelines (TUBER) 2022. Nutrient profiles of hospital menus were evaluated using Nutrient Rich Food 9.3 (NRF 9.3) and SAIN-LIM models. The carbon and water footprints of the menus were calculated and compared with those of the Mediterranean diet. Findings Menus’ energy and nutrient content did not conform with TUBER 2022. The SAIN-LIM score of Hospital A (5.7 ± 1.1) was significantly higher than that of Hospitals C (4.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.001) and E (5.1 ± 0.7, p = 0.025). The carbon footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (2.6 ± 0.3 kg CO2 eq/person/day) and that of Hospital D (4 ± 0.9 kg CO2 eq/person/day) was significantly higher than those of others (p < 0.001). While other menus were similar (p > 0.05), the water footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (3.5 ± 0.7 L/kg, p < 0.001). In addition, if the menus were suitable for the Mediterranean diet, a reduction of 2.2–23.4% in the carbon footprint and 37.5–58.6% in the water footprint could be achieved. Moreover, menus’ carbon and water footprints were negatively correlated with NRF 9.3 and SAIN-LIM scores. Research limitations/implications The primary aim should be to ensure that the planned menus follow the dietary guidelines. In addition, it is an undeniable fact that sustainable nutrition is a complex process with many dimensions. However, it seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes to be made in food services. Practical implications It seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes. For both health and environmental impacts, food services should switch to menus suitable for the Mediterranean diet. Originality/value The findings provide new insights into hospital menus’ quality and environmental impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition &amp; Food Science\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition &amp; Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-07-2023-0154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-07-2023-0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估土耳其五家医院一个月菜单的营养成分、碳足迹和水足迹,并将其对环境的影响与地中海饮食进行比较。 设计/方法/途径 将菜单的能量和营养成分与《土耳其膳食指南》(TUBER)2022 年的建议进行比较。使用营养丰富食品 9.3(NRF 9.3)和 SAIN-LIM 模型对医院菜单的营养成分进行了评估。计算了菜单的碳足迹和水足迹,并与地中海饮食进行了比较。 结果 菜单的能量和营养成分与 TUBER 2022 不一致。医院 A 的 SAIN-LIM 得分(5.7 ± 1.1)明显高于医院 C(4.8 ± 0.7,p = 0.001)和医院 E(5.1 ± 0.7,p = 0.025)。医院 A 的碳足迹(2.6 ± 0.3 千克二氧化碳当量/人/天)明显低于其他医院(p < 0.001),医院 D 的碳足迹(4 ± 0.9 千克二氧化碳当量/人/天)明显高于其他医院(p < 0.001)。其他菜单的水足迹相似(p > 0.05),但医院 A 的水足迹明显较低(3.5 ± 0.7 升/千克,p < 0.001)。此外,如果菜单适合地中海饮食,碳足迹可减少 2.2-23.4%,水足迹可减少 37.5-58.6%。此外,菜单的碳足迹和水足迹与 NRF 9.3 和 SAIN-LIM 分数呈负相关。 研究局限性/启示 首要目标应是确保计划菜单符合膳食指南。此外,不可否认的事实是,可持续营养是一个复杂的过程,涉及许多方面。不过,只要对餐饮服务稍作改动,就有可能改善菜单的营养成分,减少对环境的影响。 实际意义 只要稍作改动,似乎就能改善菜单的营养成分并减少其对环境的影响。从健康和环境影响两方面考虑,餐饮服务应改用适合地中海饮食的菜单。 原创性/价值 研究结果为了解医院菜单的质量和对环境的影响提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between nutrient profiles, carbon footprint and water footprint of hospital menus
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the nutrient profile, carbon footprint and water footprint of one-month menus presented in five hospitals in Turkey and compare their environmental impacts with that of the Mediterranean diet. Design/methodology/approach The energy and nutrient content of menus were compared with recommendations of the Turkey Dietary Guidelines (TUBER) 2022. Nutrient profiles of hospital menus were evaluated using Nutrient Rich Food 9.3 (NRF 9.3) and SAIN-LIM models. The carbon and water footprints of the menus were calculated and compared with those of the Mediterranean diet. Findings Menus’ energy and nutrient content did not conform with TUBER 2022. The SAIN-LIM score of Hospital A (5.7 ± 1.1) was significantly higher than that of Hospitals C (4.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.001) and E (5.1 ± 0.7, p = 0.025). The carbon footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (2.6 ± 0.3 kg CO2 eq/person/day) and that of Hospital D (4 ± 0.9 kg CO2 eq/person/day) was significantly higher than those of others (p < 0.001). While other menus were similar (p > 0.05), the water footprint of Hospital A was significantly lower (3.5 ± 0.7 L/kg, p < 0.001). In addition, if the menus were suitable for the Mediterranean diet, a reduction of 2.2–23.4% in the carbon footprint and 37.5–58.6% in the water footprint could be achieved. Moreover, menus’ carbon and water footprints were negatively correlated with NRF 9.3 and SAIN-LIM scores. Research limitations/implications The primary aim should be to ensure that the planned menus follow the dietary guidelines. In addition, it is an undeniable fact that sustainable nutrition is a complex process with many dimensions. However, it seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes to be made in food services. Practical implications It seems possible to improve the nutrient profiles of the menus and reduce their environmental footprint with minor changes. For both health and environmental impacts, food services should switch to menus suitable for the Mediterranean diet. Originality/value The findings provide new insights into hospital menus’ quality and environmental impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信