奥地利 "秩序理论

R. Cubeddu
{"title":"奥地利 \"秩序理论","authors":"R. Cubeddu","doi":"10.4081/ilpolitico.2023.873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to 'Austrian' Liberalism, an order could be defined as the unintentional result of individual choices with which, sometimes in unforeseen situations but supported by experience, individuals have managed to select rules of conduct aimed at reducing unintended, unexpected consequences and undesirables of human actions. In this order – which is therefore a provisional 'state' that no one in particular wanted and whose future is open to unexplored possibilities – knowledge and time play a primary role. However, not only has this type of order never existed (because the political regimes we have experienced were formed above all through acts of oppression, of power and through collective and political choices), but today it also has little chance of being realized . In fact, in situations characterized by the continuous emergence of new circumstances and scientific, technological and moral innovations, the time in which individual and social expectations are formed, modified and spread tends to increasingly diverge from that which institutions use to make choices. policies that favor or maintain a dimension of order understood as predictability of the outcomes of behaviors and choices in a non-ergodic world. Nonetheless, starting from 'Austrian' themes such as the theory of exchange, institutions, catallaxy and above all time, the author believes that a perhaps unorthodox but fruitful elaboration of a liberal theory of order is still possible.","PeriodicalId":504980,"journal":{"name":"Il Politico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ‘AUSTRIAN’ THEORY OF ORDER\",\"authors\":\"R. Cubeddu\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ilpolitico.2023.873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to 'Austrian' Liberalism, an order could be defined as the unintentional result of individual choices with which, sometimes in unforeseen situations but supported by experience, individuals have managed to select rules of conduct aimed at reducing unintended, unexpected consequences and undesirables of human actions. In this order – which is therefore a provisional 'state' that no one in particular wanted and whose future is open to unexplored possibilities – knowledge and time play a primary role. However, not only has this type of order never existed (because the political regimes we have experienced were formed above all through acts of oppression, of power and through collective and political choices), but today it also has little chance of being realized . In fact, in situations characterized by the continuous emergence of new circumstances and scientific, technological and moral innovations, the time in which individual and social expectations are formed, modified and spread tends to increasingly diverge from that which institutions use to make choices. policies that favor or maintain a dimension of order understood as predictability of the outcomes of behaviors and choices in a non-ergodic world. Nonetheless, starting from 'Austrian' themes such as the theory of exchange, institutions, catallaxy and above all time, the author believes that a perhaps unorthodox but fruitful elaboration of a liberal theory of order is still possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Il Politico\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Il Politico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2023.873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Il Politico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2023.873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 "奥地利 "自由主义的观点,秩序可以被定义为个人选择的非故意结果,有时是在不可预见的情况下,但在经验的支持下,个人设法选择了行为规则,旨在减少人类行为的非故意、意外后果和不可取之处。因此,在这种秩序中,知识和时间发挥着主要作用,而这种秩序是一种临时的 "状态",没有人特别想要这种状态,其未来的可能性也是未知的。然而,这种秩序不仅从未存在过(因为我们所经历的政治制度首先是通过压迫、权力行为以及集体和政治选择形成的),而且在今天也几乎没有实现的可能。事实上,在新情况不断出现,科学、技术和道德不断创新的情况下,个人和社会的期望形成、改变和传播的时间,往往越来越偏离机构用来做出选择的时间。尽管如此,从 "奥地利 "的主题出发,如交换理论、制度、催眠术,尤其是时间,作者认为,对自由主义秩序理论进行也许非正统但富有成果的阐述仍然是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AN ‘AUSTRIAN’ THEORY OF ORDER
According to 'Austrian' Liberalism, an order could be defined as the unintentional result of individual choices with which, sometimes in unforeseen situations but supported by experience, individuals have managed to select rules of conduct aimed at reducing unintended, unexpected consequences and undesirables of human actions. In this order – which is therefore a provisional 'state' that no one in particular wanted and whose future is open to unexplored possibilities – knowledge and time play a primary role. However, not only has this type of order never existed (because the political regimes we have experienced were formed above all through acts of oppression, of power and through collective and political choices), but today it also has little chance of being realized . In fact, in situations characterized by the continuous emergence of new circumstances and scientific, technological and moral innovations, the time in which individual and social expectations are formed, modified and spread tends to increasingly diverge from that which institutions use to make choices. policies that favor or maintain a dimension of order understood as predictability of the outcomes of behaviors and choices in a non-ergodic world. Nonetheless, starting from 'Austrian' themes such as the theory of exchange, institutions, catallaxy and above all time, the author believes that a perhaps unorthodox but fruitful elaboration of a liberal theory of order is still possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信