通过重新考虑混合大学环境中的学生评估战略优化评估实践

M. Neacsu, Florentina Bucuroiu, Mădălina Țibrian, Nicoleta Sămărescu
{"title":"通过重新考虑混合大学环境中的学生评估战略优化评估实践","authors":"M. Neacsu, Florentina Bucuroiu, Mădălina Țibrian, Nicoleta Sămărescu","doi":"10.24250/jpe/2/2023/mgn/fb/mt/ns/","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theoretical foundation of the research problem highlights both a series of choices and priorities of university trainers regarding the adoption of authentic assessing strategies enriched in the virtual environment, as well as certain limits, difficulties and costs entailed by computerized testing, some applications and electronic platforms, testing of new face-to-face assessment tools etc. The aim of the research was to identify those assessing strategies used by university trainers in the virtual environment, which have proven their effectiveness in the online assessment of students and which have been maintained and enriched to be applied in hybrid university training alongside other modern assessment techniques and tools. The research questions that guided the entire study were: What evaluative strategies did university trainers adopt in the virtual environment? What were the most effective assessment strategies adopted according to the specifics of the discipline, assessment objectives and competencies? How were hybrid assessment practices optimized by adopting the new distance assessment strategies? What preferences did students have in hybrid assessment? What advantages and disadvantages are highlighted in adopting such assessment practices? The research methodology brought together qualitative and quantitative research methods, techniques and tools. Main findings describe the particularities of the assessment at the end of the hybrid trainings, the specifics of the design of synchronous and asynchronous student evaluation tasks, the customization of assessment platforms used in electronic evaluation, the adoption of new assessment methods and the improvement of face-to-face assessment techniques and tools.","PeriodicalId":333593,"journal":{"name":"Journal Plus Education","volume":"195 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OPTIMIZING EVALUATION PRACTICES THROUGH RECONSIDERATION OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES IN THE HYBRID UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENT\",\"authors\":\"M. Neacsu, Florentina Bucuroiu, Mădălina Țibrian, Nicoleta Sămărescu\",\"doi\":\"10.24250/jpe/2/2023/mgn/fb/mt/ns/\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theoretical foundation of the research problem highlights both a series of choices and priorities of university trainers regarding the adoption of authentic assessing strategies enriched in the virtual environment, as well as certain limits, difficulties and costs entailed by computerized testing, some applications and electronic platforms, testing of new face-to-face assessment tools etc. The aim of the research was to identify those assessing strategies used by university trainers in the virtual environment, which have proven their effectiveness in the online assessment of students and which have been maintained and enriched to be applied in hybrid university training alongside other modern assessment techniques and tools. The research questions that guided the entire study were: What evaluative strategies did university trainers adopt in the virtual environment? What were the most effective assessment strategies adopted according to the specifics of the discipline, assessment objectives and competencies? How were hybrid assessment practices optimized by adopting the new distance assessment strategies? What preferences did students have in hybrid assessment? What advantages and disadvantages are highlighted in adopting such assessment practices? The research methodology brought together qualitative and quantitative research methods, techniques and tools. Main findings describe the particularities of the assessment at the end of the hybrid trainings, the specifics of the design of synchronous and asynchronous student evaluation tasks, the customization of assessment platforms used in electronic evaluation, the adoption of new assessment methods and the improvement of face-to-face assessment techniques and tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Plus Education\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Plus Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24250/jpe/2/2023/mgn/fb/mt/ns/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Plus Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24250/jpe/2/2023/mgn/fb/mt/ns/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题的理论基础既强调了大学培训者在采用虚拟环境中丰富的真实评估策略方面的一系列选择和优先事项,也强调了计算机化测试、某些应用程序和电子平台、新的面对面评估工具测试等带来的某些限制、困难和成本。研究的目的是确定大学培训者在虚拟环境中使用的评估策略,这些策略已被证明在对学生的在线评估中是有效的,并得到了保留和丰富,可与其他现代评估技术和工具一起应用于混合大学培训中。指导整个研究的研究问题是大学培训者在虚拟环境中采用了哪些评估策略?根据学科特点、评估目标和能力,采用了哪些最有效的评估策略?通过采用新的远程评估策略,混合评估实践是如何优化的?学生在混合评估中有哪些偏好?采用这种评估方法有哪些优势和劣势?研究方法结合了定性和定量研究方法、技术和工具。主要研究结果介绍了混合培训结束时的评估特点、同步和异步学生评估任务的具体设计、电子评估中使用的评估平台的定制、新评估方法的采用以及面对面评估技术和工具的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OPTIMIZING EVALUATION PRACTICES THROUGH RECONSIDERATION OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES IN THE HYBRID UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENT
The theoretical foundation of the research problem highlights both a series of choices and priorities of university trainers regarding the adoption of authentic assessing strategies enriched in the virtual environment, as well as certain limits, difficulties and costs entailed by computerized testing, some applications and electronic platforms, testing of new face-to-face assessment tools etc. The aim of the research was to identify those assessing strategies used by university trainers in the virtual environment, which have proven their effectiveness in the online assessment of students and which have been maintained and enriched to be applied in hybrid university training alongside other modern assessment techniques and tools. The research questions that guided the entire study were: What evaluative strategies did university trainers adopt in the virtual environment? What were the most effective assessment strategies adopted according to the specifics of the discipline, assessment objectives and competencies? How were hybrid assessment practices optimized by adopting the new distance assessment strategies? What preferences did students have in hybrid assessment? What advantages and disadvantages are highlighted in adopting such assessment practices? The research methodology brought together qualitative and quantitative research methods, techniques and tools. Main findings describe the particularities of the assessment at the end of the hybrid trainings, the specifics of the design of synchronous and asynchronous student evaluation tasks, the customization of assessment platforms used in electronic evaluation, the adoption of new assessment methods and the improvement of face-to-face assessment techniques and tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信