基于人工智能的 12 导联心电图左心室收缩功能障碍识别:现有模型的外部验证和高级应用

Sebastian König, Sven Hohenstein, A. Nitsche, V. Pellissier, J. Leiner, Lars Stellmacher, G. Hindricks, Andreas Bollmann
{"title":"基于人工智能的 12 导联心电图左心室收缩功能障碍识别:现有模型的外部验证和高级应用","authors":"Sebastian König, Sven Hohenstein, A. Nitsche, V. Pellissier, J. Leiner, Lars Stellmacher, G. Hindricks, Andreas Bollmann","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnostic application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models to detect cardiovascular diseases from electrocardiograms (ECG) evolves and promising results were reported. However, external validation is not available for all published algorithms. Aim of this study was to validate an existing algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from 12-lead ECGs. Patients with digitalized data pairs of 12-lead ECGs and echocardiography (at intervals of ≤7 days) were retrospectively selected from the Heart Center Leipzig ECG and electronic medical records databases. A previously developed AI-based model was applied to ECGs and calculated probabilities for LVSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed overall and in cohorts stratified for baseline and ECG characteristics. Repeated echocardiography studies recorded ≥3 months after index diagnostics were used for follow-up (FU) analysis. At baseline, 42,291 ECG-echocardiography pairs were analyzed and AUROC for LVSD detection was 0.88. Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 77% for the optimal LVSD-probability cutoff based on Youden’s J. AUROCs were lower in ECG-subgroups with tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and wide QRS complexes. In patients without LVSD at baseline and available FU, model-generated high probability for LVSD was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of developing LVSD during FU. We provide the external validation of an existing AI-based ECG-analyzing model for the detection of LVSD with robust performance metrics. The association of false positive LVSD screenings at baseline with a deterioration of ventricular function during FU deserves a further evaluation in prospective trials.","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":"923 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based identification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from 12-lead electrocardiograms: External validation and advanced application of an existing model\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian König, Sven Hohenstein, A. Nitsche, V. Pellissier, J. Leiner, Lars Stellmacher, G. Hindricks, Andreas Bollmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diagnostic application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models to detect cardiovascular diseases from electrocardiograms (ECG) evolves and promising results were reported. However, external validation is not available for all published algorithms. Aim of this study was to validate an existing algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from 12-lead ECGs. Patients with digitalized data pairs of 12-lead ECGs and echocardiography (at intervals of ≤7 days) were retrospectively selected from the Heart Center Leipzig ECG and electronic medical records databases. A previously developed AI-based model was applied to ECGs and calculated probabilities for LVSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed overall and in cohorts stratified for baseline and ECG characteristics. Repeated echocardiography studies recorded ≥3 months after index diagnostics were used for follow-up (FU) analysis. At baseline, 42,291 ECG-echocardiography pairs were analyzed and AUROC for LVSD detection was 0.88. Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 77% for the optimal LVSD-probability cutoff based on Youden’s J. AUROCs were lower in ECG-subgroups with tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and wide QRS complexes. In patients without LVSD at baseline and available FU, model-generated high probability for LVSD was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of developing LVSD during FU. We provide the external validation of an existing AI-based ECG-analyzing model for the detection of LVSD with robust performance metrics. The association of false positive LVSD screenings at baseline with a deterioration of ventricular function during FU deserves a further evaluation in prospective trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"volume\":\"923 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于人工智能(AI)模型的诊断应用不断发展,可从心电图(ECG)中检测心血管疾病,并取得了可喜的成果。然而,并非所有已发布的算法都经过了外部验证。本研究的目的是验证一种从 12 导联心电图检测左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)的现有算法。 研究人员从莱比锡心脏中心的心电图和电子病历数据库中回顾性选取了具有 12 导联心电图和超声心动图数字化数据对(间隔时间≤7 天)的患者。之前开发的基于人工智能的模型被应用于心电图,并计算出左心室退化症的概率。计算了总体和按基线和心电图特征分层的队列的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。指标诊断后≥3个月记录的重复超声心动图检查用于随访(FU)分析。基线时,分析了 42,291 对心电图-超声心动图,LVSD 检测的 AUROC 为 0.88。在心动过速、心房颤动和宽QRS波群的心电图亚组中,AUROC较低。在基线时没有左心室功能不全的患者中,模型生成的左心室功能不全的高概率与左心室功能不全发生风险增加 4 倍有关。 我们以可靠的性能指标对现有的基于人工智能的心电图分析模型进行了外部验证,以检测 LVSD。基线LVSD筛查假阳性与FU期间心室功能恶化的关联值得在前瞻性试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence-based identification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction from 12-lead electrocardiograms: External validation and advanced application of an existing model
The diagnostic application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models to detect cardiovascular diseases from electrocardiograms (ECG) evolves and promising results were reported. However, external validation is not available for all published algorithms. Aim of this study was to validate an existing algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) from 12-lead ECGs. Patients with digitalized data pairs of 12-lead ECGs and echocardiography (at intervals of ≤7 days) were retrospectively selected from the Heart Center Leipzig ECG and electronic medical records databases. A previously developed AI-based model was applied to ECGs and calculated probabilities for LVSD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed overall and in cohorts stratified for baseline and ECG characteristics. Repeated echocardiography studies recorded ≥3 months after index diagnostics were used for follow-up (FU) analysis. At baseline, 42,291 ECG-echocardiography pairs were analyzed and AUROC for LVSD detection was 0.88. Sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 77% for the optimal LVSD-probability cutoff based on Youden’s J. AUROCs were lower in ECG-subgroups with tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and wide QRS complexes. In patients without LVSD at baseline and available FU, model-generated high probability for LVSD was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of developing LVSD during FU. We provide the external validation of an existing AI-based ECG-analyzing model for the detection of LVSD with robust performance metrics. The association of false positive LVSD screenings at baseline with a deterioration of ventricular function during FU deserves a further evaluation in prospective trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信