医学学士第一专业学生早期临床接触教学方法成果比较研究:病房病人演示法与视频和假病人演示法

B. L. Bamboria, Namit Garg, Nitu Kumari, Anita Choudhary, A. Tripathi, Megha Sharma, Ashish Sharma
{"title":"医学学士第一专业学生早期临床接触教学方法成果比较研究:病房病人演示法与视频和假病人演示法","authors":"B. L. Bamboria, Namit Garg, Nitu Kumari, Anita Choudhary, A. Tripathi, Megha Sharma, Ashish Sharma","doi":"10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) is a newer concept of teaching learning methodology which provides clinical perspective and relevance to learning of basic sciences. ECE also orients towards actual clinical scenarios and helps the medical students to correlate their theoretical knowledge with real life situations right from the first year of medical college. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcome of teaching methods for Early Clinical Exposure in 1st Professional MBBS students and to assess the effect and efficiency in their performance. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was carried with a sample population of 50 students of MBBS 1st prof. 2021 batch who were selected by random allocation method and divided into two groups of 25 students each, one acting as Bedside ECE group and other as Virtual ECE group. Pre training evaluation was performed at the beginning of study and Post training evaluation was performed after three months. The student’s feedback was taken regarding advantages, disadvantages and suggestions for further improvement. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the Bedside ECE and Virtual ECE group at post training in theory (t=15.682, p<0.001), practical (t=12.671, p<0.001) and total (t=17.460, p<0.001) marks of the students after 3 months training. The mean scores of participants were significantly improved more in the Bedside ECE group (39.92±3.23) as compared to Virtual ECE group (23.04±3.60). Analysis of students’ feedback revealed that Bedside ECE was found to be more interesting method of teaching as compared to virtual methods and helped to develop empathy towards the patients as well as motivated them to read more about the topic and helped in retention. Conclusion: Direct contact with patient has been seen to play a crucial role in development of clinical reasoning, communication skills and professional attitudes. The concept of Bedside Early Clinical Exposure goes longway in helping young minds in grasping clinical and theoretical concepts better by involving all domains of learning. KEY WORDS: Competency Based Medical Education, Early Clinical Exposure, Empathy, Reflection, Bedside ECE, Virtual ECE","PeriodicalId":127536,"journal":{"name":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of outcome of the Teaching methods for Early Clinical Exposure in 1st Professional MBBS students: Ward side patient demonstration method Vs Video & Dummy patient demonstration method\",\"authors\":\"B. L. Bamboria, Namit Garg, Nitu Kumari, Anita Choudhary, A. Tripathi, Megha Sharma, Ashish Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) is a newer concept of teaching learning methodology which provides clinical perspective and relevance to learning of basic sciences. ECE also orients towards actual clinical scenarios and helps the medical students to correlate their theoretical knowledge with real life situations right from the first year of medical college. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcome of teaching methods for Early Clinical Exposure in 1st Professional MBBS students and to assess the effect and efficiency in their performance. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was carried with a sample population of 50 students of MBBS 1st prof. 2021 batch who were selected by random allocation method and divided into two groups of 25 students each, one acting as Bedside ECE group and other as Virtual ECE group. Pre training evaluation was performed at the beginning of study and Post training evaluation was performed after three months. The student’s feedback was taken regarding advantages, disadvantages and suggestions for further improvement. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the Bedside ECE and Virtual ECE group at post training in theory (t=15.682, p<0.001), practical (t=12.671, p<0.001) and total (t=17.460, p<0.001) marks of the students after 3 months training. The mean scores of participants were significantly improved more in the Bedside ECE group (39.92±3.23) as compared to Virtual ECE group (23.04±3.60). Analysis of students’ feedback revealed that Bedside ECE was found to be more interesting method of teaching as compared to virtual methods and helped to develop empathy towards the patients as well as motivated them to read more about the topic and helped in retention. Conclusion: Direct contact with patient has been seen to play a crucial role in development of clinical reasoning, communication skills and professional attitudes. The concept of Bedside Early Clinical Exposure goes longway in helping young minds in grasping clinical and theoretical concepts better by involving all domains of learning. KEY WORDS: Competency Based Medical Education, Early Clinical Exposure, Empathy, Reflection, Bedside ECE, Virtual ECE\",\"PeriodicalId\":127536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central India Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central India Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central India Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58999/cijmr.v2i03.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期临床接触(ECE)是一种较新的教学方法概念,为基础科学的学习提供了临床视角和相关性。ECE 还面向实际临床情景,帮助医科学生从医学院一年级开始就将理论知识与实际生活情景联系起来。目的和目标:本研究旨在比较医学学士专业一年级学生早期临床接触教学方法的结果,并评估其效果和效率。材料与方法:这项前瞻性比较研究通过随机分配法选取了 50 名 2021 届 MBBS 第一专业的学生,将他们分为两组,每组 25 人,一组为床边幼教组,另一组为虚拟幼教组。研究开始时进行培训前评估,三个月后进行培训后评估。学生对培训的优缺点和进一步改进的建议进行了反馈。结果床边幼教组和虚拟幼教组的学员在三个月的培训后,在理论(t=15.682,p<0.001)、实践(t=12.671,p<0.001)和总分(t=17.460,p<0.001)方面的差异有统计学意义。与虚拟幼教组(23.04±3.60)相比,床边幼教组学员的平均分(39.92±3.23)明显提高。对学员反馈的分析表明,与虚拟教学法相比,床旁幼教法更有趣,有助于培养学员对病人的同情心,激励他们阅读更多相关内容,并有助于学员保留知识。结论与病人的直接接触在培养临床推理能力、沟通技巧和专业态度方面发挥着至关重要的作用。床旁早期临床接触的概念通过涉及所有学习领域,可帮助年轻人更好地掌握临床和理论概念。关键字:基于能力的医学教育、早期临床接触、移情、反思、床旁幼教、虚拟幼教
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of outcome of the Teaching methods for Early Clinical Exposure in 1st Professional MBBS students: Ward side patient demonstration method Vs Video & Dummy patient demonstration method
Background: Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) is a newer concept of teaching learning methodology which provides clinical perspective and relevance to learning of basic sciences. ECE also orients towards actual clinical scenarios and helps the medical students to correlate their theoretical knowledge with real life situations right from the first year of medical college. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcome of teaching methods for Early Clinical Exposure in 1st Professional MBBS students and to assess the effect and efficiency in their performance. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was carried with a sample population of 50 students of MBBS 1st prof. 2021 batch who were selected by random allocation method and divided into two groups of 25 students each, one acting as Bedside ECE group and other as Virtual ECE group. Pre training evaluation was performed at the beginning of study and Post training evaluation was performed after three months. The student’s feedback was taken regarding advantages, disadvantages and suggestions for further improvement. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the Bedside ECE and Virtual ECE group at post training in theory (t=15.682, p<0.001), practical (t=12.671, p<0.001) and total (t=17.460, p<0.001) marks of the students after 3 months training. The mean scores of participants were significantly improved more in the Bedside ECE group (39.92±3.23) as compared to Virtual ECE group (23.04±3.60). Analysis of students’ feedback revealed that Bedside ECE was found to be more interesting method of teaching as compared to virtual methods and helped to develop empathy towards the patients as well as motivated them to read more about the topic and helped in retention. Conclusion: Direct contact with patient has been seen to play a crucial role in development of clinical reasoning, communication skills and professional attitudes. The concept of Bedside Early Clinical Exposure goes longway in helping young minds in grasping clinical and theoretical concepts better by involving all domains of learning. KEY WORDS: Competency Based Medical Education, Early Clinical Exposure, Empathy, Reflection, Bedside ECE, Virtual ECE
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信