基于实践的 STEM 服务学习课程创建指南

Genna Miller, Minna Ng
{"title":"基于实践的 STEM 服务学习课程创建指南","authors":"Genna Miller, Minna Ng","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This practice-based article describes two undergraduate service learning (SL) courses in STEM disciplines: economics and neuroscience. We share our experiences to encourage other instructors to develop their STEM SL courses. The top five majors by degree completion in order of popularity are computer science, economics, public policy, biology and engineering at our institution, Duke University, Durham, NC (Spicer 2023); four of these are STEM, yet they represent less than 20 percent of our SL courses (Whiteman 2023). This under-representation has resulted in fewer resources that are STEM SL- specific. The resources for SL in the social sciences are well established, but do not necessarily translate well to STEM SL courses. There are many reasons to adopt SL for STEM courses. It offers students the opportunity to give back to the community and to learn in meaningful ways outside of the classroom. As described by the American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U 2022a), ‘working with community partners is good preparation for citizenship, work, and life.’ We describe two basic models, the direct and indirect SL model, and how these were used in our courses. Based on our practice-based experiences, we developed four stages for our colleagues to follow when creating their STEM SL course: (1) identify course objectives; (2) build mutually beneficial partnerships; (3) design assignments; and (4) integrate reflections. Our goal was to share the course structures we developed using these stages so that others could adopt them in their STEM disciplines.","PeriodicalId":504616,"journal":{"name":"Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"33 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practice-based guide for creating STEM service learning courses\",\"authors\":\"Genna Miller, Minna Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This practice-based article describes two undergraduate service learning (SL) courses in STEM disciplines: economics and neuroscience. We share our experiences to encourage other instructors to develop their STEM SL courses. The top five majors by degree completion in order of popularity are computer science, economics, public policy, biology and engineering at our institution, Duke University, Durham, NC (Spicer 2023); four of these are STEM, yet they represent less than 20 percent of our SL courses (Whiteman 2023). This under-representation has resulted in fewer resources that are STEM SL- specific. The resources for SL in the social sciences are well established, but do not necessarily translate well to STEM SL courses. There are many reasons to adopt SL for STEM courses. It offers students the opportunity to give back to the community and to learn in meaningful ways outside of the classroom. As described by the American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U 2022a), ‘working with community partners is good preparation for citizenship, work, and life.’ We describe two basic models, the direct and indirect SL model, and how these were used in our courses. Based on our practice-based experiences, we developed four stages for our colleagues to follow when creating their STEM SL course: (1) identify course objectives; (2) build mutually beneficial partnerships; (3) design assignments; and (4) integrate reflections. Our goal was to share the course structures we developed using these stages so that others could adopt them in their STEM disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement\",\"volume\":\"33 S2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇基于实践的文章介绍了两门 STEM 学科的本科生服务学习(SL)课程:经济学和神经科学。我们分享我们的经验,以鼓励其他教师开发他们的 STEM SL 课程。在我们的学校--北卡罗来纳州达勒姆的杜克大学(Duke University, Durham, NC),按完成学位的热门程度排序的前五大专业依次是计算机科学、经济学、公共政策、生物学和工程学(Spicer 2023);其中四个专业是 STEM,但它们在我们的服务学习课程中所占的比例不到 20%(Whiteman 2023)。这种代表性不足的情况导致针对 STEM SL 的资源较少。社会科学领域的 SL 资源已经非常成熟,但并不一定能很好地转化为 STEM SL 课程。 在 STEM 课程中采用 SL 有很多原因。它为学生提供了回馈社会和在课堂外进行有意义学习的机会。正如美国大学协会(AAC&U 2022a)所述,"与社区伙伴合作是为公民身份、工作和生活做好准备。 我们介绍了两种基本模式,即直接和间接 SL 模式,以及如何在我们的课程中使用这两种模式。根据我们的实践经验,我们制定了四个阶段,供同行们在创建 STEM SL 课程时遵循:(1) 确定课程目标;(2) 建立互惠互利的伙伴关系;(3) 设计作业;(4) 整合反思。我们的目标是分享我们利用这些阶段开发的课程结构,以便其他人可以在他们的 STEM 学科中采用这些结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A practice-based guide for creating STEM service learning courses
This practice-based article describes two undergraduate service learning (SL) courses in STEM disciplines: economics and neuroscience. We share our experiences to encourage other instructors to develop their STEM SL courses. The top five majors by degree completion in order of popularity are computer science, economics, public policy, biology and engineering at our institution, Duke University, Durham, NC (Spicer 2023); four of these are STEM, yet they represent less than 20 percent of our SL courses (Whiteman 2023). This under-representation has resulted in fewer resources that are STEM SL- specific. The resources for SL in the social sciences are well established, but do not necessarily translate well to STEM SL courses. There are many reasons to adopt SL for STEM courses. It offers students the opportunity to give back to the community and to learn in meaningful ways outside of the classroom. As described by the American Association of Colleges & Universities (AAC&U 2022a), ‘working with community partners is good preparation for citizenship, work, and life.’ We describe two basic models, the direct and indirect SL model, and how these were used in our courses. Based on our practice-based experiences, we developed four stages for our colleagues to follow when creating their STEM SL course: (1) identify course objectives; (2) build mutually beneficial partnerships; (3) design assignments; and (4) integrate reflections. Our goal was to share the course structures we developed using these stages so that others could adopt them in their STEM disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信