通过非线性问题对 Capuchin 搜索算法进行性能评估,以及优化齿轮系设计问题

Erdal Eker
{"title":"通过非线性问题对 Capuchin 搜索算法进行性能评估,以及优化齿轮系设计问题","authors":"Erdal Eker","doi":"10.36222/ejt.1391524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the superiority of the Capuchin Search Algorithm (CapSA), a metaheuristic, in competitive environments and its advantages in optimizing engineering design problems. To achieve this, the CEC 2019 function set was used. Due to the challenging characteristics of the CEC 2019 function set in reaching a global solution, it effectively showcases the algorithm's quality. For this comparison, sea-horse optimizer (SHO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), sine-cosine algorithm (SCA), and smell agent optimization (SAO) were chosen as current and effective alternatives to the CapSA algorithm. Furthermore, the gear train design problem (GTD) was selected as an engineering design problem. In addition to the CapSA algorithm, a hybrid of SCA and GWO algorithm (SC-GWO) and genetic algorithm (GA) were chosen as alternatives for optimizing this problem. The performance superiority and optimization power of the CapSA algorithm were assessed using statistical metrics and convergence curves, then compared with alternative algorithms. Experimental results conclusively demonstrate the significant effectiveness and advantages of the CapSA algorithm.","PeriodicalId":413929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Technic","volume":"104 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Capuchin Search Algorithm Through Non-linear Problems, and Optimization of Gear Train Design Problem\",\"authors\":\"Erdal Eker\",\"doi\":\"10.36222/ejt.1391524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the superiority of the Capuchin Search Algorithm (CapSA), a metaheuristic, in competitive environments and its advantages in optimizing engineering design problems. To achieve this, the CEC 2019 function set was used. Due to the challenging characteristics of the CEC 2019 function set in reaching a global solution, it effectively showcases the algorithm's quality. For this comparison, sea-horse optimizer (SHO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), sine-cosine algorithm (SCA), and smell agent optimization (SAO) were chosen as current and effective alternatives to the CapSA algorithm. Furthermore, the gear train design problem (GTD) was selected as an engineering design problem. In addition to the CapSA algorithm, a hybrid of SCA and GWO algorithm (SC-GWO) and genetic algorithm (GA) were chosen as alternatives for optimizing this problem. The performance superiority and optimization power of the CapSA algorithm were assessed using statistical metrics and convergence curves, then compared with alternative algorithms. Experimental results conclusively demonstrate the significant effectiveness and advantages of the CapSA algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Technic\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Technic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1391524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Technic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1391524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在证明元启发式算法 Capuchin Search Algorithm (CapSA) 在竞争环境中的优越性及其在优化工程设计问题方面的优势。为此,我们使用了 CEC 2019 函数集。由于 CEC 2019 函数集在达成全局解决方案方面具有挑战性,因此它有效地展示了该算法的质量。在此次比较中,选择了海马优化算法(SHO)、灰狼优化算法(GWO)、正弦余弦算法(SCA)和嗅觉代理优化算法(SAO)作为 CapSA 算法当前有效的替代算法。此外,还选择了齿轮系设计问题(GTD)作为工程设计问题。除 CapSA 算法外,还选择了 SCA 和 GWO 混合算法(SC-GWO)以及遗传算法(GA)作为优化该问题的替代算法。利用统计指标和收敛曲线评估了 CapSA 算法的性能优越性和优化能力,然后与其他算法进行了比较。实验结果最终证明了 CapSA 算法的显著效果和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Capuchin Search Algorithm Through Non-linear Problems, and Optimization of Gear Train Design Problem
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the superiority of the Capuchin Search Algorithm (CapSA), a metaheuristic, in competitive environments and its advantages in optimizing engineering design problems. To achieve this, the CEC 2019 function set was used. Due to the challenging characteristics of the CEC 2019 function set in reaching a global solution, it effectively showcases the algorithm's quality. For this comparison, sea-horse optimizer (SHO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), sine-cosine algorithm (SCA), and smell agent optimization (SAO) were chosen as current and effective alternatives to the CapSA algorithm. Furthermore, the gear train design problem (GTD) was selected as an engineering design problem. In addition to the CapSA algorithm, a hybrid of SCA and GWO algorithm (SC-GWO) and genetic algorithm (GA) were chosen as alternatives for optimizing this problem. The performance superiority and optimization power of the CapSA algorithm were assessed using statistical metrics and convergence curves, then compared with alternative algorithms. Experimental results conclusively demonstrate the significant effectiveness and advantages of the CapSA algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信