大选后巴西利亚的示威活动

Bharbara Bonelle de Sousa, Mayra Duarte Figueira, Rivaldo Capistrano de Souza Júnior
{"title":"大选后巴西利亚的示威活动","authors":"Bharbara Bonelle de Sousa, Mayra Duarte Figueira, Rivaldo Capistrano de Souza Júnior","doi":"10.47456/cl.v17i37.41808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we aim to analyze verbal violence (Amossy, 2017; Cabral 2018, 2020) in Twitter comments, observing how aggressive and hostile language constitutes a relevant strategy for building ethos. To do so, we selected a set of comments to the tweet of former president Jair Bolsonaro, on January 8, 2023. Thus, considering the relevance of analytical categories of Textual Linguistics for argumentative discourse analysis (Cavalcante et al., 2020,2022), we chose referencing as a textual criterion possible to be mobilized for the analysis of argumentativeness in controversial interactions and we assume that verbal violence, according to Cabral (2018, 2020), is located in a framework in which subjects use ad hominem arguments to argumentatively mark the distance in relation to the other and to build an image of oneself. Based on the analysis carried out, we conclude that discourse objects i) contribute to the establishment, maintenance and updating of the polemical interaction and ii) constitute, in the polemical game, a relevant resource of verbal violence, reinforcing the dichotomous nature of the controversy, as well as a strategy for building an ethos.","PeriodicalId":507136,"journal":{"name":"Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manifestações em Brasília no período pós-eleitoral\",\"authors\":\"Bharbara Bonelle de Sousa, Mayra Duarte Figueira, Rivaldo Capistrano de Souza Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.47456/cl.v17i37.41808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we aim to analyze verbal violence (Amossy, 2017; Cabral 2018, 2020) in Twitter comments, observing how aggressive and hostile language constitutes a relevant strategy for building ethos. To do so, we selected a set of comments to the tweet of former president Jair Bolsonaro, on January 8, 2023. Thus, considering the relevance of analytical categories of Textual Linguistics for argumentative discourse analysis (Cavalcante et al., 2020,2022), we chose referencing as a textual criterion possible to be mobilized for the analysis of argumentativeness in controversial interactions and we assume that verbal violence, according to Cabral (2018, 2020), is located in a framework in which subjects use ad hominem arguments to argumentatively mark the distance in relation to the other and to build an image of oneself. Based on the analysis carried out, we conclude that discourse objects i) contribute to the establishment, maintenance and updating of the polemical interaction and ii) constitute, in the polemical game, a relevant resource of verbal violence, reinforcing the dichotomous nature of the controversy, as well as a strategy for building an ethos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47456/cl.v17i37.41808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista (Con)Textos Linguísticos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47456/cl.v17i37.41808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们旨在分析推特评论中的语言暴力(Amossy, 2017; Cabral 2018, 2020),观察攻击性和敌对性语言是如何构成构建风气的相关策略的。为此,我们选择了 2023 年 1 月 8 日前总统博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)推特的一组评论。因此,考虑到文本语言学的分析类别与论辩性话语分析的相关性(Cavalcante et al.根据所进行的分析,我们得出结论认为,话语对象 i) 有助于论战互动的建立、维持和更新;ii) 在论战游戏中,构成了语言暴力的相关资源,强化了争议的二分法性质,同时也是建立伦理的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manifestações em Brasília no período pós-eleitoral
In this article, we aim to analyze verbal violence (Amossy, 2017; Cabral 2018, 2020) in Twitter comments, observing how aggressive and hostile language constitutes a relevant strategy for building ethos. To do so, we selected a set of comments to the tweet of former president Jair Bolsonaro, on January 8, 2023. Thus, considering the relevance of analytical categories of Textual Linguistics for argumentative discourse analysis (Cavalcante et al., 2020,2022), we chose referencing as a textual criterion possible to be mobilized for the analysis of argumentativeness in controversial interactions and we assume that verbal violence, according to Cabral (2018, 2020), is located in a framework in which subjects use ad hominem arguments to argumentatively mark the distance in relation to the other and to build an image of oneself. Based on the analysis carried out, we conclude that discourse objects i) contribute to the establishment, maintenance and updating of the polemical interaction and ii) constitute, in the polemical game, a relevant resource of verbal violence, reinforcing the dichotomous nature of the controversy, as well as a strategy for building an ethos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信