比较口服月见草胶囊和阴道月见草胶囊与同期引产和单纯引产对毕晓普评分和部分分娩结果的影响:三盲临床试验

IF 0.5 Q4 NURSING
Mahdiehsadat Hosseini Poor, Zahra Saghafi, H. Ghaedamini
{"title":"比较口服月见草胶囊和阴道月见草胶囊与同期引产和单纯引产对毕晓普评分和部分分娩结果的影响:三盲临床试验","authors":"Mahdiehsadat Hosseini Poor, Zahra Saghafi, H. Ghaedamini","doi":"10.5812/jnms-140350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cervical ripening and achieving a favorable Bishop score are crucial for a successful delivery. When the cervix is not adequately ripe, exclusive labor induction might not succeed. Therefore, there is a need to identify safe concurrent interventions to improve the Bishop score. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of oral (capsule) and vaginal evening primrose oil, in conjunction with labor induction, on the Bishop score and various labor outcomes in pregnant women. Methods: This randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted on 170 pregnant women admitted to terminate their pregnancies at Niknafs Maternity hospital in Rafsanjan, Iran, in 2020. The subjects were randomly allocated to 2 intervention groups: the oral evening primrose oil group (n = 57) and the vaginal evening primrose oil group (n = 56). A control group (n = 57) received oxytocin induction alone. Group assignment was performed using the minimization method. The first intervention group received two oral evening primrose 1 000 mg capsules; however, the second group received two 1 000 mg vaginal capsules, both in conjunction with labor induction using 10 units of oxytocin per 1 000 cc of Ringer’s serum. The data were collected using a checklist with three parts: The mother’s demographic characteristics, obstetric characteristics, and childbirth details. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, median, and standard deviation (SD), were employed. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent t-tests (the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric tests), and the chi-square test. Results: Two hours after induction, the mean Bishop scores in the oral, vaginal, and control groups were 5.47 ± 1.67, 6.28 ± 1.91, and 4.09 ± 1.61, respectively (P < 0.001). Four hours after induction, the respective scores were 7.63 ± 1.59, 8.00 ± 1.20, and 5.18 ± 1.97 (P < 0.001). The vaginal group had significantly higher Bishop scores. Furthermore, the duration of the first and second phases of labor was significantly shorter in the vaginal group than in the oral and control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Vaginal evening primrose oil was significantly more effective than oral capsules and induction with oxytocin alone in terms of the Bishop score and most labor outcomes.","PeriodicalId":42130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","volume":"186 S503","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Evening Primrose Capsules with Concurrent Labor Induction and Exclusive Labor Induction on Bishop Score and Some Labor Outcomes: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Mahdiehsadat Hosseini Poor, Zahra Saghafi, H. Ghaedamini\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jnms-140350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cervical ripening and achieving a favorable Bishop score are crucial for a successful delivery. When the cervix is not adequately ripe, exclusive labor induction might not succeed. Therefore, there is a need to identify safe concurrent interventions to improve the Bishop score. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of oral (capsule) and vaginal evening primrose oil, in conjunction with labor induction, on the Bishop score and various labor outcomes in pregnant women. Methods: This randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted on 170 pregnant women admitted to terminate their pregnancies at Niknafs Maternity hospital in Rafsanjan, Iran, in 2020. The subjects were randomly allocated to 2 intervention groups: the oral evening primrose oil group (n = 57) and the vaginal evening primrose oil group (n = 56). A control group (n = 57) received oxytocin induction alone. Group assignment was performed using the minimization method. The first intervention group received two oral evening primrose 1 000 mg capsules; however, the second group received two 1 000 mg vaginal capsules, both in conjunction with labor induction using 10 units of oxytocin per 1 000 cc of Ringer’s serum. The data were collected using a checklist with three parts: The mother’s demographic characteristics, obstetric characteristics, and childbirth details. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, median, and standard deviation (SD), were employed. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent t-tests (the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric tests), and the chi-square test. Results: Two hours after induction, the mean Bishop scores in the oral, vaginal, and control groups were 5.47 ± 1.67, 6.28 ± 1.91, and 4.09 ± 1.61, respectively (P < 0.001). Four hours after induction, the respective scores were 7.63 ± 1.59, 8.00 ± 1.20, and 5.18 ± 1.97 (P < 0.001). The vaginal group had significantly higher Bishop scores. Furthermore, the duration of the first and second phases of labor was significantly shorter in the vaginal group than in the oral and control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Vaginal evening primrose oil was significantly more effective than oral capsules and induction with oxytocin alone in terms of the Bishop score and most labor outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences\",\"volume\":\"186 S503\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-140350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-140350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宫颈成熟和获得良好的 Bishop 评分是成功分娩的关键。当宫颈成熟度不够时,纯引产可能不会成功。因此,有必要确定安全的同期干预措施,以提高 Bishop 评分。研究目的本研究旨在比较口服(胶囊)和阴道月见草油与引产同时使用对孕妇 Bishop 评分和各种分娩结局的影响。研究方法这项随机三盲临床试验于 2020 年在伊朗拉夫桑扬的 Niknafs 妇产医院进行,对象是 170 名前来终止妊娠的孕妇。受试者被随机分配到两个干预组:口服月见草油组(57 人)和阴道月见草油组(56 人)。对照组(n = 57)只接受催产素诱导。组别分配采用最小化法。第一干预组口服月见草油胶囊两粒,每粒 1000 毫克;第二干预组阴道服用月见草油胶囊两粒,每粒 1000 毫克,同时使用催产素引产,每 1000 毫升林格氏血清含 10 单位催产素。数据收集采用了一份包含三个部分的核对表:产妇的人口统计学特征、产科特征和分娩细节。采用描述性统计,包括频率、百分比、平均值、中位数和标准差(SD)。统计分析包括单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、独立 t 检验(非参数检验采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验)以及卡方检验。结果诱导两小时后,口服组、阴道组和对照组的平均 Bishop 评分分别为 5.47 ± 1.67、6.28 ± 1.91 和 4.09 ± 1.61(P < 0.001)。诱导四小时后,评分分别为 7.63 ± 1.59、8.00 ± 1.20 和 5.18 ± 1.97(P < 0.001)。阴道组的 Bishop 评分明显更高。此外,阴道组第一产程和第二产程的持续时间明显短于口服组和对照组(P < 0.001)。结论就 Bishop 评分和大多数分娩结果而言,阴道月见草油的效果明显优于口服胶囊和单纯催产素引产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Evening Primrose Capsules with Concurrent Labor Induction and Exclusive Labor Induction on Bishop Score and Some Labor Outcomes: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial
Background: Cervical ripening and achieving a favorable Bishop score are crucial for a successful delivery. When the cervix is not adequately ripe, exclusive labor induction might not succeed. Therefore, there is a need to identify safe concurrent interventions to improve the Bishop score. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of oral (capsule) and vaginal evening primrose oil, in conjunction with labor induction, on the Bishop score and various labor outcomes in pregnant women. Methods: This randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted on 170 pregnant women admitted to terminate their pregnancies at Niknafs Maternity hospital in Rafsanjan, Iran, in 2020. The subjects were randomly allocated to 2 intervention groups: the oral evening primrose oil group (n = 57) and the vaginal evening primrose oil group (n = 56). A control group (n = 57) received oxytocin induction alone. Group assignment was performed using the minimization method. The first intervention group received two oral evening primrose 1 000 mg capsules; however, the second group received two 1 000 mg vaginal capsules, both in conjunction with labor induction using 10 units of oxytocin per 1 000 cc of Ringer’s serum. The data were collected using a checklist with three parts: The mother’s demographic characteristics, obstetric characteristics, and childbirth details. Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, median, and standard deviation (SD), were employed. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), independent t-tests (the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric tests), and the chi-square test. Results: Two hours after induction, the mean Bishop scores in the oral, vaginal, and control groups were 5.47 ± 1.67, 6.28 ± 1.91, and 4.09 ± 1.61, respectively (P < 0.001). Four hours after induction, the respective scores were 7.63 ± 1.59, 8.00 ± 1.20, and 5.18 ± 1.97 (P < 0.001). The vaginal group had significantly higher Bishop scores. Furthermore, the duration of the first and second phases of labor was significantly shorter in the vaginal group than in the oral and control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Vaginal evening primrose oil was significantly more effective than oral capsules and induction with oxytocin alone in terms of the Bishop score and most labor outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信