患者参与跨专业生活方式医学计划的预测因素

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
A. Cheng, Mollie E Dwivedi, Adriana Martin, Christina G Leslie, Madeline Pashos, Viola B Donahue, Julia B Huecker, Elizabeth A Salerno, Karen Steger-May, Devyani M Hunt
{"title":"患者参与跨专业生活方式医学计划的预测因素","authors":"A. Cheng, Mollie E Dwivedi, Adriana Martin, Christina G Leslie, Madeline Pashos, Viola B Donahue, Julia B Huecker, Elizabeth A Salerno, Karen Steger-May, Devyani M Hunt","doi":"10.1177/15598276231222877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in lifestyle habits can reduce morbidity and mortality, but not everyone who can benefit from lifestyle intervention is ready to do so. To describe characteristics of patients who did and did not engage with a lifestyle medicine program, and to identify predictors of engagement. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 276 adult patients who presented for consultation to a goal-directed, individualized, interprofessional lifestyle medicine program. The primary outcome was patients’ extent of engagement. Candidate predictors considered in multivariable multinomial logistic regression models included baseline sociodemographic, psychological, and health-related variables. A predictor of full engagement over no engagement was having private or Medicare insurance (rather than Medicaid, other, or no insurance) (OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.3-14.2], P = .021). A predictor of partial engagement over no engagement was having a primary goal to lose weight (OR 3.1 [1.1-8.4], P = .026). System-level efforts to support coverage of lifestyle medicine services by all insurers may improve equitable engagement with lifestyle medicine programs. Furthermore, when assessing patients’ readiness to engage with a lifestyle medicine program, clinicians should consider and address their goals of participation.","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Patient Engagement With an Interprofessional Lifestyle Medicine Program\",\"authors\":\"A. Cheng, Mollie E Dwivedi, Adriana Martin, Christina G Leslie, Madeline Pashos, Viola B Donahue, Julia B Huecker, Elizabeth A Salerno, Karen Steger-May, Devyani M Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15598276231222877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Changes in lifestyle habits can reduce morbidity and mortality, but not everyone who can benefit from lifestyle intervention is ready to do so. To describe characteristics of patients who did and did not engage with a lifestyle medicine program, and to identify predictors of engagement. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 276 adult patients who presented for consultation to a goal-directed, individualized, interprofessional lifestyle medicine program. The primary outcome was patients’ extent of engagement. Candidate predictors considered in multivariable multinomial logistic regression models included baseline sociodemographic, psychological, and health-related variables. A predictor of full engagement over no engagement was having private or Medicare insurance (rather than Medicaid, other, or no insurance) (OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.3-14.2], P = .021). A predictor of partial engagement over no engagement was having a primary goal to lose weight (OR 3.1 [1.1-8.4], P = .026). System-level efforts to support coverage of lifestyle medicine services by all insurers may improve equitable engagement with lifestyle medicine programs. Furthermore, when assessing patients’ readiness to engage with a lifestyle medicine program, clinicians should consider and address their goals of participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276231222877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276231222877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改变生活习惯可以降低发病率和死亡率,但并不是每个人都能从生活方式干预中受益。目的:描述参与和未参与生活方式医学计划的患者特征,并确定参与的预测因素。这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是276名前来咨询目标定向、个性化、跨专业生活方式医学项目的成年患者。主要结果是患者的参与程度。多变量多项式逻辑回归模型中考虑的候选预测因素包括基线社会人口、心理和健康相关变量。拥有私人或医疗保险(而非医疗补助、其他或无保险)是完全参与而非不参与的预测因素(OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.3-14.2],P = .021)。部分参与而非不参与的预测因素是以减肥为主要目标(OR 3.1 [1.1-8.4],P = .026)。通过系统层面的努力支持所有保险公司覆盖生活方式医学服务,可能会提高生活方式医学项目的公平参与度。此外,在评估患者是否准备参与生活方式医学项目时,临床医生应考虑并解决他们的参与目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Patient Engagement With an Interprofessional Lifestyle Medicine Program
Changes in lifestyle habits can reduce morbidity and mortality, but not everyone who can benefit from lifestyle intervention is ready to do so. To describe characteristics of patients who did and did not engage with a lifestyle medicine program, and to identify predictors of engagement. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 276 adult patients who presented for consultation to a goal-directed, individualized, interprofessional lifestyle medicine program. The primary outcome was patients’ extent of engagement. Candidate predictors considered in multivariable multinomial logistic regression models included baseline sociodemographic, psychological, and health-related variables. A predictor of full engagement over no engagement was having private or Medicare insurance (rather than Medicaid, other, or no insurance) (OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.3-14.2], P = .021). A predictor of partial engagement over no engagement was having a primary goal to lose weight (OR 3.1 [1.1-8.4], P = .026). System-level efforts to support coverage of lifestyle medicine services by all insurers may improve equitable engagement with lifestyle medicine programs. Furthermore, when assessing patients’ readiness to engage with a lifestyle medicine program, clinicians should consider and address their goals of participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信