挽救性食管切除术:为什么选择性切除鳞状细胞癌是有意义的?

N. Zhou, W. Hofstetter
{"title":"挽救性食管切除术:为什么选择性切除鳞状细胞癌是有意义的?","authors":"N. Zhou, W. Hofstetter","doi":"10.1177/26345161231218874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous clinical trials have concluded that trimodality and bimodality therapy are equivalent for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the use of chemoradiation alone achieves only a 45% to 50% complete response rate. Surgery remains crucial for locoregional control. In ESCC, salvage esophagectomy for locoregional recurrence has increased morbidity compared to planned esophagectomy. Retrospective data suggest that patients requiring cervical/upper chest anastomosis are more likely to undergo salvage esophagectomy rather than completing trimodality therapy. It’s unclear if selective surgery versus an operative approach on all patients after chemoradiation leads to differences in overall outcomes.","PeriodicalId":508891,"journal":{"name":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","volume":"381 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salvage Esophagectomy: Why it Makes Sense to Selectively Resect Squamous Cell Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"N. Zhou, W. Hofstetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26345161231218874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous clinical trials have concluded that trimodality and bimodality therapy are equivalent for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the use of chemoradiation alone achieves only a 45% to 50% complete response rate. Surgery remains crucial for locoregional control. In ESCC, salvage esophagectomy for locoregional recurrence has increased morbidity compared to planned esophagectomy. Retrospective data suggest that patients requiring cervical/upper chest anastomosis are more likely to undergo salvage esophagectomy rather than completing trimodality therapy. It’s unclear if selective surgery versus an operative approach on all patients after chemoradiation leads to differences in overall outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society\",\"volume\":\"381 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231218874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231218874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的临床试验认为,三联疗法和双联疗法在治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)方面效果相当。然而,单独使用化疗仅能达到 45% 至 50% 的完全反应率。手术对于局部控制仍然至关重要。在 ESCC 中,与计划中的食管切除术相比,针对局部复发的挽救性食管切除术会增加发病率。回顾性数据表明,需要进行颈部/上胸部吻合术的患者更有可能接受挽救性食管切除术,而不是完成三联疗法。目前还不清楚化疗后选择性手术与对所有患者进行手术治疗是否会导致总体疗效的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salvage Esophagectomy: Why it Makes Sense to Selectively Resect Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous clinical trials have concluded that trimodality and bimodality therapy are equivalent for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the use of chemoradiation alone achieves only a 45% to 50% complete response rate. Surgery remains crucial for locoregional control. In ESCC, salvage esophagectomy for locoregional recurrence has increased morbidity compared to planned esophagectomy. Retrospective data suggest that patients requiring cervical/upper chest anastomosis are more likely to undergo salvage esophagectomy rather than completing trimodality therapy. It’s unclear if selective surgery versus an operative approach on all patients after chemoradiation leads to differences in overall outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信