近端设备上的量子振幅估算算法:实用指南

Q2 Physics and Astronomy
Marco Maronese, Massimiliano Incudini, Luca Asproni, Enrico Prati
{"title":"近端设备上的量子振幅估算算法:实用指南","authors":"Marco Maronese, Massimiliano Incudini, Luca Asproni, Enrico Prati","doi":"10.3390/quantum6010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.","PeriodicalId":34124,"journal":{"name":"Quantum Reports","volume":"389 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quantum Amplitude Estimation Algorithms on Near-Term Devices: A Practical Guide\",\"authors\":\"Marco Maronese, Massimiliano Incudini, Luca Asproni, Enrico Prati\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/quantum6010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantum Reports\",\"volume\":\"389 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantum Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量子振幅估计(QAE)算法是一种重要的量子算法,旨在实现四倍速度提升。在实现容错量子计算之前,与经典蒙特卡洛(MC)相比,量子计算的竞争力仍难以企及。我们已经开发出了替代方法,以便在需要更少资源的同时保持有利的理论缩放。我们在数值积分任务中比较了标准 QAE 算法和两个噪声中间量子(NISQ)友好版本的 QAE 算法,并以 Metropolis-Hastings 的蒙特卡罗技术作为经典基准。分别从估计误差与样本数、计算时间和求解所需的量子电路长度的函数关系对算法进行了评估。我们在一台 11 量子位阱离子量子计算机上测试了两种 QAE 替代方案的有效性,以验证哪种方案能首先加快积分估计问题的速度。我们得出的结论是,相位估算常规方法更可取。事实上,最大似然估计保证了量子电路长度与积分估计精度之间的最佳权衡,并具有更强的抗噪能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Quantum Amplitude Estimation Algorithms on Near-Term Devices: A Practical Guide
The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantum Reports
Quantum Reports Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信