道德微调论证

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Religions Pub Date : 2023-12-24 DOI:10.3390/rel15010031

Martin Jakobsen

{"title":"道德微调论证","authors":"Martin Jakobsen","doi":"10.3390/rel15010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops Mark D. Linville’s brief description of “a sort of moral fine-tuning argument”. I develop the argument in four ways: I unpack the argument and give it a clear formulation, I unpack the theistic explanation of why a somewhat reliable moral capacity is expected, I point to the significance of not seeking to explain a perfect moral capacity, and I put the argument up against the recent work on non-theistic moral epistemology by Derek Parfit, David Enoch, and Erik Wielenberg.","PeriodicalId":38169,"journal":{"name":"Religions","volume":"2014 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Moral Fine-Tuning Argument\",\"authors\":\"Martin Jakobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/rel15010031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops Mark D. Linville’s brief description of “a sort of moral fine-tuning argument”. I develop the argument in four ways: I unpack the argument and give it a clear formulation, I unpack the theistic explanation of why a somewhat reliable moral capacity is expected, I point to the significance of not seeking to explain a perfect moral capacity, and I put the argument up against the recent work on non-theistic moral epistemology by Derek Parfit, David Enoch, and Erik Wielenberg.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religions\",\"volume\":\"2014 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文发展了马克-D-林维尔对 "一种道德微调论证 "的简要描述。我从四个方面展开论证：我解读了这一论点，并给出了清晰的表述；我解读了有神论对为何期待某种可靠的道德能力的解释；我指出了不寻求解释完美道德能力的意义；我将这一论点与德里克-帕菲特、大卫-伊诺克和埃里克-维伦伯格最近在非有神论道德认识论方面的工作进行了对比。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A Moral Fine-Tuning Argument

This paper develops Mark D. Linville’s brief description of “a sort of moral fine-tuning argument”. I develop the argument in four ways: I unpack the argument and give it a clear formulation, I unpack the theistic explanation of why a somewhat reliable moral capacity is expected, I point to the significance of not seeking to explain a perfect moral capacity, and I put the argument up against the recent work on non-theistic moral epistemology by Derek Parfit, David Enoch, and Erik Wielenberg.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

37.50%

发文量

1020

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： Religions (ISSN 2077-1444) is an international, open access scholarly journal, publishing peer reviewed studies of religious thought and practice. It is available online to promote critical, hermeneutical, historical, and constructive conversations. Religions publishes regular research papers, reviews, communications and reports on research projects. In addition, the journal accepts comprehensive book reviews by distinguished authors and discussions of important venues for the publication of scholarly work in the study of religion. Religions aims to serve the interests of a wide range of thoughtful readers and academic scholars of religion, as well as theologians, philosophers, social scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, neuroscientists and others interested in the multidisciplinary study of religions