重新审视金融发展对生态足迹的影响:人口老龄化、人均 GDP 和技术创新的作用

Rongrong Li, Sailan Hu, Xinchen Cheng, Qiang Wang
{"title":"重新审视金融发展对生态足迹的影响:人口老龄化、人均 GDP 和技术创新的作用","authors":"Rongrong Li, Sailan Hu, Xinchen Cheng, Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231215322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing research results on the impact of financial development on ecological footprint are inconsistent or even opposite. In order to better understand the impact of financial development on ecological footprint, this study explores the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint from the perspectives of population aging, GDP per capita, and technological innovation. The results show that when the population aging level is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint is 0.285, but when the aging level exceeds the second threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint becomes faint negative. Similarly, after per capita GDP crosses the threshold, the correlation coefficient between financial development and ecological footprint turns from positive to faint negative. Compared to this, when the level of technological innovation is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is 0.155, while when the level of technological innovation is above the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is −0.597. The above results indicates that the impact of financial development on the ecological footprint is affected by other factors. Compared with changes in population structure (aging) and social wealth (GDP per capita), technological innovation has a greater impact on the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint.","PeriodicalId":505265,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reexamining the impact of financial development on ecological footprint: The roles of population aging, per capita GDP, and technological innovation\",\"authors\":\"Rongrong Li, Sailan Hu, Xinchen Cheng, Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x231215322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing research results on the impact of financial development on ecological footprint are inconsistent or even opposite. In order to better understand the impact of financial development on ecological footprint, this study explores the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint from the perspectives of population aging, GDP per capita, and technological innovation. The results show that when the population aging level is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint is 0.285, but when the aging level exceeds the second threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint becomes faint negative. Similarly, after per capita GDP crosses the threshold, the correlation coefficient between financial development and ecological footprint turns from positive to faint negative. Compared to this, when the level of technological innovation is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is 0.155, while when the level of technological innovation is above the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is −0.597. The above results indicates that the impact of financial development on the ecological footprint is affected by other factors. Compared with changes in population structure (aging) and social wealth (GDP per capita), technological innovation has a greater impact on the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231215322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231215322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有关于金融发展对生态足迹影响的研究结果并不一致,甚至截然相反。为了更好地理解金融发展对生态足迹的影响,本研究从人口老龄化、人均 GDP、技术创新等角度探讨金融发展与生态足迹的关系。结果显示,当人口老龄化水平低于临界值时,金融发展对生态足迹的影响系数为 0.285,但当老龄化水平超过第二个临界值时,金融发展对生态足迹的影响系数变为微弱的负值。同样,当人均 GDP 跨过临界值后,金融发展与生态足迹的相关系数由正转为微弱的负值。与之相比,当技术创新水平低于临界值时,金融发展与生态足迹的系数为 0.155,而当技术创新水平高于临界值时,金融发展与生态足迹的系数为-0.597。上述结果表明,金融发展对生态足迹的影响还受到其他因素的影响。与人口结构(老龄化)和社会财富(人均 GDP)的变化相比,技术创新对金融发展与生态足迹关系的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reexamining the impact of financial development on ecological footprint: The roles of population aging, per capita GDP, and technological innovation
Existing research results on the impact of financial development on ecological footprint are inconsistent or even opposite. In order to better understand the impact of financial development on ecological footprint, this study explores the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint from the perspectives of population aging, GDP per capita, and technological innovation. The results show that when the population aging level is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint is 0.285, but when the aging level exceeds the second threshold, the coefficient of financial development on ecological footprint becomes faint negative. Similarly, after per capita GDP crosses the threshold, the correlation coefficient between financial development and ecological footprint turns from positive to faint negative. Compared to this, when the level of technological innovation is below the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is 0.155, while when the level of technological innovation is above the threshold, the coefficient of financial development and ecological footprint is −0.597. The above results indicates that the impact of financial development on the ecological footprint is affected by other factors. Compared with changes in population structure (aging) and social wealth (GDP per capita), technological innovation has a greater impact on the relationship between financial development and ecological footprint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信