医生对茶碱使用的了解:约旦的一项横断面研究

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Tasneem Basheer Ali, Huda Yousef Almomani, F. Al-Tarawneh, M. Alwadi, Ahmad Shaher Suliman
{"title":"医生对茶碱使用的了解:约旦的一项横断面研究","authors":"Tasneem Basheer Ali, Huda Yousef Almomani, F. Al-Tarawneh, M. Alwadi, Ahmad Shaher Suliman","doi":"10.35516/jjps.v16i4.1789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to assess physicians' knowledge regarding theophylline drug and other related characteristics in Jordan. Materials and Method: The study was conducted prospectively among physicians in Jordan. Physicians were interviewed using an online questionnaire consisting of two sections. The first section included demographics and other relevant characteristics, while the second section comprised questions about theophylline drug. Results: A total of 385 participants completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants knew that theophylline is used in clinical practice as a bronchodilator (75.6%). Nearly 39% of participants knew that theophylline can be administered orally and intravenously. The largest share of participants (76.1%) did not know that theophylline dosage is calculated based on ideal body weight. Sixty percent of participants knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during pregnancy. On the other hand, only 27.3% knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during breastfeeding. The majority of participants (76.1%) had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Conclusions: It was noted that physicians had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Physicians demonstrated unsatisfactory knowledge about theophylline’s indications, clinical use, administration, adverse effects, and other related aspects. These findings highlight the need for educational interventions and training programs to improve physicians’ knowledge of theophylline and enhance its effective and safe use in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":14719,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"30 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicians' Knowledge of Theophylline Use: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan\",\"authors\":\"Tasneem Basheer Ali, Huda Yousef Almomani, F. Al-Tarawneh, M. Alwadi, Ahmad Shaher Suliman\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jjps.v16i4.1789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to assess physicians' knowledge regarding theophylline drug and other related characteristics in Jordan. Materials and Method: The study was conducted prospectively among physicians in Jordan. Physicians were interviewed using an online questionnaire consisting of two sections. The first section included demographics and other relevant characteristics, while the second section comprised questions about theophylline drug. Results: A total of 385 participants completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants knew that theophylline is used in clinical practice as a bronchodilator (75.6%). Nearly 39% of participants knew that theophylline can be administered orally and intravenously. The largest share of participants (76.1%) did not know that theophylline dosage is calculated based on ideal body weight. Sixty percent of participants knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during pregnancy. On the other hand, only 27.3% knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during breastfeeding. The majority of participants (76.1%) had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Conclusions: It was noted that physicians had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Physicians demonstrated unsatisfactory knowledge about theophylline’s indications, clinical use, administration, adverse effects, and other related aspects. These findings highlight the need for educational interventions and training programs to improve physicians’ knowledge of theophylline and enhance its effective and safe use in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"30 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i4.1789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i4.1789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本横断面研究旨在评估约旦医生对茶碱类药物及其他相关特征的了解程度。材料与方法:本研究对约旦的医生进行了前瞻性调查。医生们接受了由两部分组成的在线问卷调查。第一部分包括人口统计学和其他相关特征,第二部分包括有关茶碱类药物的问题。结果:共有 385 名参与者完成了问卷调查。大多数参与者知道茶碱在临床上被用作支气管扩张剂(75.6%)。近39%的参与者知道茶碱可以口服和静脉注射。大部分参与者(76.1%)不知道茶碱的剂量是根据理想体重计算的。60%的參加者知道在懷孕期間並不禁忌使用茶鹼。另一方面,只有27.3%的參加者知道在餵哺母乳期間並不禁忌使用茶鹼。大多数参与者(76.1%)对茶碱的总体了解处于中等水平。结论医生对茶碱的总体认识处于中等水平。医生对茶碱的适应症、临床使用、用药、不良反应和其他相关方面的知识并不满意。这些发现凸显了教育干预和培训计划的必要性,以提高医生对茶碱的认识,并加强其在临床实践中的有效和安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicians' Knowledge of Theophylline Use: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to assess physicians' knowledge regarding theophylline drug and other related characteristics in Jordan. Materials and Method: The study was conducted prospectively among physicians in Jordan. Physicians were interviewed using an online questionnaire consisting of two sections. The first section included demographics and other relevant characteristics, while the second section comprised questions about theophylline drug. Results: A total of 385 participants completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants knew that theophylline is used in clinical practice as a bronchodilator (75.6%). Nearly 39% of participants knew that theophylline can be administered orally and intravenously. The largest share of participants (76.1%) did not know that theophylline dosage is calculated based on ideal body weight. Sixty percent of participants knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during pregnancy. On the other hand, only 27.3% knew that theophylline use was not contraindicated during breastfeeding. The majority of participants (76.1%) had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Conclusions: It was noted that physicians had an overall intermediate knowledge of theophylline. Physicians demonstrated unsatisfactory knowledge about theophylline’s indications, clinical use, administration, adverse effects, and other related aspects. These findings highlight the need for educational interventions and training programs to improve physicians’ knowledge of theophylline and enhance its effective and safe use in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JJPS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the pharmaceutical community at large. Although the JJPS is intended to be of interest to pharmaceutical scientists, other healthy workers, and manufacturing processors will also find it most interesting and informative. Papers will cover basic pharmaceutical and applied research, scientific commentaries, as well as views, reviews. Topics on products will include manufacturing process, quality control, pharmaceutical engineering, pharmaceutical technology, and philosophies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences. The editorial advisory board would like to place an emphasis on new and innovative methods, technologies, and techniques for the pharmaceutical industry. The reader will find a broad range of important topics in this first issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信