双人垄断游戏中同时移动与顺序移动的比较

Adyda Ibrahim, Nerda Z. Zaibidi
{"title":"双人垄断游戏中同时移动与顺序移动的比较","authors":"Adyda Ibrahim, Nerda Z. Zaibidi","doi":"10.32802/asmscj.2023.1287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, a Stackelberg competition benefits the leader and the consumer due to making the first move in a sequential game. However, in this paper, sequential movement does not offer an advantage over simultaneous movement in a static duopoly under quantity competition with an isoelastic demand function. By introducing dynamics into the duopoly model through numerical simulations of simultaneous and sequential movements towards the Cournot equilibrium, there is evidence of first-mover advantage. However, simultaneous movement is advantageous over sequential movement in terms of better profits for both firms and lower prices for the consumer.","PeriodicalId":503593,"journal":{"name":"ASM Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Simultaneous and Sequential Movements in a Duopoly Game\",\"authors\":\"Adyda Ibrahim, Nerda Z. Zaibidi\",\"doi\":\"10.32802/asmscj.2023.1287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In general, a Stackelberg competition benefits the leader and the consumer due to making the first move in a sequential game. However, in this paper, sequential movement does not offer an advantage over simultaneous movement in a static duopoly under quantity competition with an isoelastic demand function. By introducing dynamics into the duopoly model through numerical simulations of simultaneous and sequential movements towards the Cournot equilibrium, there is evidence of first-mover advantage. However, simultaneous movement is advantageous over sequential movement in terms of better profits for both firms and lower prices for the consumer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASM Science Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASM Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2023.1287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2023.1287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一般来说,在斯塔克尔伯格竞争中,领导者和消费者都会因为在顺序博弈中先行一步而受益。然而,在本文中,在需求函数具有等弹性的数量竞争条件下的静态双头垄断中,顺序移动并不比同时移动更有优势。通过对同时移动和顺序移动走向库诺均衡的数值模拟,将动态引入双头垄断模型,证明了先行者优势。然而,就两家公司获得更高的利润和消费者获得更低的价格而言,同时移动比顺序移动更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Simultaneous and Sequential Movements in a Duopoly Game
In general, a Stackelberg competition benefits the leader and the consumer due to making the first move in a sequential game. However, in this paper, sequential movement does not offer an advantage over simultaneous movement in a static duopoly under quantity competition with an isoelastic demand function. By introducing dynamics into the duopoly model through numerical simulations of simultaneous and sequential movements towards the Cournot equilibrium, there is evidence of first-mover advantage. However, simultaneous movement is advantageous over sequential movement in terms of better profits for both firms and lower prices for the consumer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信