三个广泛使用的全球再分析数据集中大气风的不确定性

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Longtao Wu, Hui Su, Xubin Zeng, Derek J. Posselt, Sun Wong, Shuyi Chen, A. Stoffelen
{"title":"三个广泛使用的全球再分析数据集中大气风的不确定性","authors":"Longtao Wu, Hui Su, Xubin Zeng, Derek J. Posselt, Sun Wong, Shuyi Chen, A. Stoffelen","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atmospheric winds are crucial to the transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical species, facilitating Earth’s climate system interactions. Existing weather and climate studies rely heavily on the wind fields from reanalysis datasets. In this study, we analyze the uncertainty of instantaneous atmospheric winds in three reanalysis (ERA5, MERRA2 and CFSv2) datasets. We show that the mean wind vector differences (WVDs) between the reanalysis datasets are about 3–6 m s−1 in the troposphere. The mean absolute wind direction differences can be more than 50°. Large WVDs greater than 5 m s−1 are found for 30–50% of the time when the observed precipitation rate is larger than 0.1 mm hr−1 over Eastern Pacific, Indian Ocean, Atlantic and some mountain areas. The mean WVDs exhibit seasonal variations but no significant diurnal variations. The uncertainty of vertical wind shear has a correlation of 0.59 with the uncertainty of winds at 300 hPa. The magnitudes of vorticity and horizontal divergence uncertainties are on the order of 1×10−5 s−1, which is comparable to the mean values of vorticity and horizontal divergence. In comparison to some limited observations from field campaigns, the reanalysis datasets exhibit a mean WVD ranging from 2–4.5 m s−1. Among the three reanalysis datasets, ERA5 shows the closest agreement with the observations while MERRA2 has the largest discrepancy. The substantial uncertainty and errors of the reanalysis wind products highlight the critical need for new satellite missions dedicated to 3D wind measurements.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":"9 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty of Atmospheric Winds in Three Widely Used Global Reanalysis Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Longtao Wu, Hui Su, Xubin Zeng, Derek J. Posselt, Sun Wong, Shuyi Chen, A. Stoffelen\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Atmospheric winds are crucial to the transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical species, facilitating Earth’s climate system interactions. Existing weather and climate studies rely heavily on the wind fields from reanalysis datasets. In this study, we analyze the uncertainty of instantaneous atmospheric winds in three reanalysis (ERA5, MERRA2 and CFSv2) datasets. We show that the mean wind vector differences (WVDs) between the reanalysis datasets are about 3–6 m s−1 in the troposphere. The mean absolute wind direction differences can be more than 50°. Large WVDs greater than 5 m s−1 are found for 30–50% of the time when the observed precipitation rate is larger than 0.1 mm hr−1 over Eastern Pacific, Indian Ocean, Atlantic and some mountain areas. The mean WVDs exhibit seasonal variations but no significant diurnal variations. The uncertainty of vertical wind shear has a correlation of 0.59 with the uncertainty of winds at 300 hPa. The magnitudes of vorticity and horizontal divergence uncertainties are on the order of 1×10−5 s−1, which is comparable to the mean values of vorticity and horizontal divergence. In comparison to some limited observations from field campaigns, the reanalysis datasets exhibit a mean WVD ranging from 2–4.5 m s−1. Among the three reanalysis datasets, ERA5 shows the closest agreement with the observations while MERRA2 has the largest discrepancy. The substantial uncertainty and errors of the reanalysis wind products highlight the critical need for new satellite missions dedicated to 3D wind measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology\",\"volume\":\"9 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气风对热量、水分、动量和化学物质的传输至关重要,促进了地球气候系统的相互作用。现有的天气和气候研究在很大程度上依赖于再分析数据集的风场。在本研究中,我们分析了三个再分析数据集(ERA5、MERRA2 和 CFSv2)中瞬时大气风的不确定性。我们发现,在对流层,再分析数据集之间的平均风向差(WVDs)约为 3-6 m s-1。平均绝对风向差异可超过 50°。在东太平洋、印度洋、大西洋和一些山区,当观测到的降水速率大于 0.1 毫米/小时-1 时,有 30-50%的时间会出现大于 5 米秒-1 的巨大风向矢量差。平均风切变呈现季节性变化,但没有明显的日变化。垂直风切变的不确定性与 300 hPa 风的不确定性的相关性为 0.59。涡度和水平辐散的不确定性大小约为 1×10-5 s-1,与涡度和水平辐散的平均值相当。与一些有限的野外观测数据相比,再分析数据集的平均WVD范围在2-4.5 m s-1之间。在三个再分析数据集中,ERA5 与观测结果最接近,而 MERRA2 的差异最大。再分析风产品的巨大不确定性和误差突出表明,急需新的卫星任务来专门进行三维风测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncertainty of Atmospheric Winds in Three Widely Used Global Reanalysis Datasets
Atmospheric winds are crucial to the transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical species, facilitating Earth’s climate system interactions. Existing weather and climate studies rely heavily on the wind fields from reanalysis datasets. In this study, we analyze the uncertainty of instantaneous atmospheric winds in three reanalysis (ERA5, MERRA2 and CFSv2) datasets. We show that the mean wind vector differences (WVDs) between the reanalysis datasets are about 3–6 m s−1 in the troposphere. The mean absolute wind direction differences can be more than 50°. Large WVDs greater than 5 m s−1 are found for 30–50% of the time when the observed precipitation rate is larger than 0.1 mm hr−1 over Eastern Pacific, Indian Ocean, Atlantic and some mountain areas. The mean WVDs exhibit seasonal variations but no significant diurnal variations. The uncertainty of vertical wind shear has a correlation of 0.59 with the uncertainty of winds at 300 hPa. The magnitudes of vorticity and horizontal divergence uncertainties are on the order of 1×10−5 s−1, which is comparable to the mean values of vorticity and horizontal divergence. In comparison to some limited observations from field campaigns, the reanalysis datasets exhibit a mean WVD ranging from 2–4.5 m s−1. Among the three reanalysis datasets, ERA5 shows the closest agreement with the observations while MERRA2 has the largest discrepancy. The substantial uncertainty and errors of the reanalysis wind products highlight the critical need for new satellite missions dedicated to 3D wind measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信