人工智能应用时代的法医学与伦理学

Sanela D Andrić, Aleksandar B Ivanović
{"title":"人工智能应用时代的法医学与伦理学","authors":"Sanela D Andrić, Aleksandar B Ivanović","doi":"10.51235/kt.2023.23.3-4.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic sciences are an indispensable segment of criminal investigations. Forensics, as a dynamic science that is constantly developing, follows the development of modern scientific trends. The application of artificial intelligence has not bypassed forensic science, which by definition discovers modern scientific methods, adapts them and applies them with the aim of discovering and interpreting (expert) material traces from the scene of a crime. With the initial optimism of the application of artificial intelligence, especially in the development and application of information technologies in forensic databases, comes (un)justified caution. If artificial intelligence were to take over the simulation of shell, cognitive thinking and decision-making more and more over time, the question of ethical responsibility arises. This raises a number of questions, one of the most important of which is who is responsible in the event of an error in the analysis. Furthermore, if artificial intelligence also takes over the interpretations of forensic analyses, who in that case bears the responsibility for a possible complaint about the end result - the opinion. Our paper will deal with the mentioned problems, emphasizing that the European Union, through the ENFSI network, was the first to react in the direction of studying the application of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences, with the strategic document ENFSI - Vision of the European Forensic Science Area 2030 „Improving the reliability and validity of forensic science and encouraging implementation of new technologies“, the most important parts of which will be presented in the paper.","PeriodicalId":375468,"journal":{"name":"Kriminalističke teme","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forensic Sciences and Ethics in the Era of Application of Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Sanela D Andrić, Aleksandar B Ivanović\",\"doi\":\"10.51235/kt.2023.23.3-4.95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forensic sciences are an indispensable segment of criminal investigations. Forensics, as a dynamic science that is constantly developing, follows the development of modern scientific trends. The application of artificial intelligence has not bypassed forensic science, which by definition discovers modern scientific methods, adapts them and applies them with the aim of discovering and interpreting (expert) material traces from the scene of a crime. With the initial optimism of the application of artificial intelligence, especially in the development and application of information technologies in forensic databases, comes (un)justified caution. If artificial intelligence were to take over the simulation of shell, cognitive thinking and decision-making more and more over time, the question of ethical responsibility arises. This raises a number of questions, one of the most important of which is who is responsible in the event of an error in the analysis. Furthermore, if artificial intelligence also takes over the interpretations of forensic analyses, who in that case bears the responsibility for a possible complaint about the end result - the opinion. Our paper will deal with the mentioned problems, emphasizing that the European Union, through the ENFSI network, was the first to react in the direction of studying the application of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences, with the strategic document ENFSI - Vision of the European Forensic Science Area 2030 „Improving the reliability and validity of forensic science and encouraging implementation of new technologies“, the most important parts of which will be presented in the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kriminalističke teme\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kriminalističke teme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51235/kt.2023.23.3-4.95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminalističke teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51235/kt.2023.23.3-4.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法医学是刑事调查中不可或缺的一部分。法医学作为一门不断发展的动态科学,紧跟现代科学的发展趋势。人工智能的应用并没有绕过法医学,顾名思义,法医学就是发现现代科学方法,调整和应用这些方法,目的是发现和解释犯罪现场的(专家)材料痕迹。在对人工智能的应用,特别是在法医数据库中信息技术的开发和应用持初步乐观态度的同时,也存在着(不合理的)谨慎态度。如果随着时间的推移,人工智能将越来越多地取代对外壳、认知思维和决策的模拟,那么就会产生道德责任问题。这就提出了一系列问题,其中最重要的一个问题是,如果分析出现错误,谁来负责。此外,如果人工智能也接管了法医分析的解释工作,那么在这种情况下,谁对最终结果--鉴定意见--可能产生的投诉负责呢? 我们的论文将讨论上述问题,并强调欧洲联盟通过 ENFSI 网络,率先在研究人工智能在法医学中的应用方面做出反应,发布了 ENFSI 战略文件--欧洲法医学领域 2030 年愿景 "提高法医学的可靠性和有效性并鼓励实施新技术",论文将介绍其中最重要的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forensic Sciences and Ethics in the Era of Application of Artificial Intelligence
Forensic sciences are an indispensable segment of criminal investigations. Forensics, as a dynamic science that is constantly developing, follows the development of modern scientific trends. The application of artificial intelligence has not bypassed forensic science, which by definition discovers modern scientific methods, adapts them and applies them with the aim of discovering and interpreting (expert) material traces from the scene of a crime. With the initial optimism of the application of artificial intelligence, especially in the development and application of information technologies in forensic databases, comes (un)justified caution. If artificial intelligence were to take over the simulation of shell, cognitive thinking and decision-making more and more over time, the question of ethical responsibility arises. This raises a number of questions, one of the most important of which is who is responsible in the event of an error in the analysis. Furthermore, if artificial intelligence also takes over the interpretations of forensic analyses, who in that case bears the responsibility for a possible complaint about the end result - the opinion. Our paper will deal with the mentioned problems, emphasizing that the European Union, through the ENFSI network, was the first to react in the direction of studying the application of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences, with the strategic document ENFSI - Vision of the European Forensic Science Area 2030 „Improving the reliability and validity of forensic science and encouraging implementation of new technologies“, the most important parts of which will be presented in the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信