英格兰和苏格兰监狱中的阿片类激动剂治疗仍存在问题--亲身经历者的观点

Russell Webster, Colin Fearns, Paula Harriott, Lisa Millar, Jardine Simpson, Jason Wallace, Michael Wheatley
{"title":"英格兰和苏格兰监狱中的阿片类激动剂治疗仍存在问题--亲身经历者的观点","authors":"Russell Webster, Colin Fearns, Paula Harriott, Lisa Millar, Jardine Simpson, Jason Wallace, Michael Wheatley","doi":"10.1108/ijoph-05-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine lived experiences of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during and immediately following release from detention in prisons in England and Scotland. Design/methodology/approach Surveys were completed by serving prisoners in both countries and by those recently released from prison (England only). The survey findings were discussed in focus groups of people with lived experience. The combined findings from the surveys and focus groups were shared with an expert group of prison OAT providers and people with lived experience with the purpose of making recommendations for more accessible and effective OAT in custodial environments and continuity of OAT on release Findings The quality and accessibility of OAT varied considerably between establishments. It was reported to be harder to access OAT in Scottish prisons. It was often hard for people in prison to get the dosage of OAT they felt they needed and it was generally harder to access buprenorphine than methadone in English prisons. Only Scottish people in prison were aware of long-lasting forms of buprenorphine. People in English prisons had mixed experiences of the help available in prison, with no improvement recorded since a 2016 study. People in Scottish prisons were more likely to rate the help available as poor. Research limitations/implications The number of people accessed while actually in prison (73) was reduced by the impact of the pandemic, making it more difficult to access people in prison and because some were resistant to participating on the basis that they had already been consulted for a wide variety of research projects focused on the impact of COVID. The Scottish cohort (a total of 19 individuals comprising 14 survey respondents and five focus group members) is clearly too small a number on which to base robust claims about differences in OAT provision between the English and Scottish prison systems.. Practical implications The study identifies key barriers to accessing OAT in prisons and suggests key components of more user-friendly approaches. Social implications This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent. Originality/value This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release in England and Scotland and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent.","PeriodicalId":510181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prison Health","volume":"50 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessing opioid agonist treatment in prison in England and Scotland remains problematic – the views of people with lived experience\",\"authors\":\"Russell Webster, Colin Fearns, Paula Harriott, Lisa Millar, Jardine Simpson, Jason Wallace, Michael Wheatley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoph-05-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine lived experiences of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during and immediately following release from detention in prisons in England and Scotland. Design/methodology/approach Surveys were completed by serving prisoners in both countries and by those recently released from prison (England only). The survey findings were discussed in focus groups of people with lived experience. The combined findings from the surveys and focus groups were shared with an expert group of prison OAT providers and people with lived experience with the purpose of making recommendations for more accessible and effective OAT in custodial environments and continuity of OAT on release Findings The quality and accessibility of OAT varied considerably between establishments. It was reported to be harder to access OAT in Scottish prisons. It was often hard for people in prison to get the dosage of OAT they felt they needed and it was generally harder to access buprenorphine than methadone in English prisons. Only Scottish people in prison were aware of long-lasting forms of buprenorphine. People in English prisons had mixed experiences of the help available in prison, with no improvement recorded since a 2016 study. People in Scottish prisons were more likely to rate the help available as poor. Research limitations/implications The number of people accessed while actually in prison (73) was reduced by the impact of the pandemic, making it more difficult to access people in prison and because some were resistant to participating on the basis that they had already been consulted for a wide variety of research projects focused on the impact of COVID. The Scottish cohort (a total of 19 individuals comprising 14 survey respondents and five focus group members) is clearly too small a number on which to base robust claims about differences in OAT provision between the English and Scottish prison systems.. Practical implications The study identifies key barriers to accessing OAT in prisons and suggests key components of more user-friendly approaches. Social implications This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent. Originality/value This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release in England and Scotland and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prison Health\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prison Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoph-05-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prison Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoph-05-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本文旨在研究英格兰和苏格兰监狱在押人员在押期间和刑满释放后接受阿片类受体激动剂治疗(OAT)的生活经历。 设计/方法/途径 这两个国家的现役囚犯和刚从监狱释放的囚犯(仅英格兰)都填写了调查问卷。有亲身经历者组成的焦点小组对调查结果进行了讨论。调查和焦点小组的综合结果与由监狱机构和有亲身经历者组成的专家组共享,目的是为在监禁环境中提供更方便、更有效的官方陪护以及在出狱后继续提供官方陪护提出建议 调查结果 官方陪护的质量和方便程度在不同机构之间存在很大差异。据报告,在苏格兰监狱中更难获得在线戒毒治疗。狱中服刑人员通常很难获得他们认为需要的 OAT 剂量,在英国监狱中,获得丁丙诺啡通常比美沙酮更难。只有苏格兰监狱的服刑人员了解长效丁丙诺啡。英国监狱中的服刑人员对监狱中提供的帮助体验不一,自 2016 年的一项研究以来,情况没有任何改善。苏格兰监狱中的服刑人员更倾向于将可提供的帮助评为 "差"。 研究局限性/影响 由于大流行病的影响,实际在监狱中接触到的人数(73 人)有所减少,这使得接触到监狱中的人变得更加困难,而且有些人因为已经接受过以 COVID 影响为重点的各种研究项目的咨询而拒绝参与。苏格兰队列(共 19 人,包括 14 名调查对象和 5 名焦点小组成员)的人数显然太少,无法据此对英格兰和苏格兰监狱系统在提供 OAT 方面的差异做出有力的论断。 实际意义 本研究确定了监狱中获取 OAT 的主要障碍,并提出了更方便用户的方法的主要组成部分。 社会意义 本研究概述了在狱中和出狱后获得 OAT 的人员的近期生活经历,并就如何更有效、更一致地提供服务提出了宝贵建议。 原创性/价值 本研究概述了英格兰和苏格兰监狱中和出狱后接受 OAT 治疗者的近期生活经历,并就如何更有效、更一致地提供服务提出了宝贵建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessing opioid agonist treatment in prison in England and Scotland remains problematic – the views of people with lived experience
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine lived experiences of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during and immediately following release from detention in prisons in England and Scotland. Design/methodology/approach Surveys were completed by serving prisoners in both countries and by those recently released from prison (England only). The survey findings were discussed in focus groups of people with lived experience. The combined findings from the surveys and focus groups were shared with an expert group of prison OAT providers and people with lived experience with the purpose of making recommendations for more accessible and effective OAT in custodial environments and continuity of OAT on release Findings The quality and accessibility of OAT varied considerably between establishments. It was reported to be harder to access OAT in Scottish prisons. It was often hard for people in prison to get the dosage of OAT they felt they needed and it was generally harder to access buprenorphine than methadone in English prisons. Only Scottish people in prison were aware of long-lasting forms of buprenorphine. People in English prisons had mixed experiences of the help available in prison, with no improvement recorded since a 2016 study. People in Scottish prisons were more likely to rate the help available as poor. Research limitations/implications The number of people accessed while actually in prison (73) was reduced by the impact of the pandemic, making it more difficult to access people in prison and because some were resistant to participating on the basis that they had already been consulted for a wide variety of research projects focused on the impact of COVID. The Scottish cohort (a total of 19 individuals comprising 14 survey respondents and five focus group members) is clearly too small a number on which to base robust claims about differences in OAT provision between the English and Scottish prison systems.. Practical implications The study identifies key barriers to accessing OAT in prisons and suggests key components of more user-friendly approaches. Social implications This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent. Originality/value This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release in England and Scotland and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信