怀疑论反对不宽容？摩西-门德尔松和皮埃尔-贝勒关于斯宾诺莎的 "对话"，载于门德尔松的《哲学对话录》（1755 年）

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Religions Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.3390/rel15010049

Guillem Sales Vilalta

{"title":"怀疑论反对不宽容？摩西-门德尔松和皮埃尔-贝勒关于斯宾诺莎的 \"对话\"，载于门德尔松的《哲学对话录》（1755 年）","authors":"Guillem Sales Vilalta","doi":"10.3390/rel15010049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is to argue for the three following theses: (1) that Moses Mendelssohn’s Philosophische Gespräche (1755) offer a rehabilitation of Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) in explicit opposition to the stigmatization that Spinoza suffered in the German lands from the beginning of the 1670s; (2) that the article “Rorarius” from Pierre Bayle’s (1647–1706) Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697–1698) is a crucial source for Mendelssohn’s strategy to rehabilitate Spinoza; (3) that Mendelssohn’s use of Bayle as a source constitutes an unexplored link between oppressed religious minorities. To show this, the article will consist of an introductory part to set the subject matter and three subsequent parts, one for each of the points that I am going to argue for.","PeriodicalId":38169,"journal":{"name":"Religions","volume":"27 108","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scepticism against Intolerance? Moses Mendelssohn and Pierre Bayle’s “Dialogue” on Spinoza in Mendelssohn’s Philosophische Gespräche (1755)\",\"authors\":\"Guillem Sales Vilalta\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/rel15010049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this article is to argue for the three following theses: (1) that Moses Mendelssohn’s Philosophische Gespräche (1755) offer a rehabilitation of Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) in explicit opposition to the stigmatization that Spinoza suffered in the German lands from the beginning of the 1670s; (2) that the article “Rorarius” from Pierre Bayle’s (1647–1706) Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697–1698) is a crucial source for Mendelssohn’s strategy to rehabilitate Spinoza; (3) that Mendelssohn’s use of Bayle as a source constitutes an unexplored link between oppressed religious minorities. To show this, the article will consist of an introductory part to set the subject matter and three subsequent parts, one for each of the points that I am going to argue for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religions\",\"volume\":\"27 108\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在论证以下三个论点：(1) 摩西-门德尔松（Moses Mendelssohn）的《哲学谈话录》（1755 年）为巴鲁克-斯宾诺莎（Baruch Spinoza，1632-1677 年）恢复名誉，明确反对斯宾诺莎自 1670 年代初在德国遭受的污名化；(2) 皮埃尔-贝勒（Pierre Bayle，1647-1706 年）的《历史与批判词典》（1697-1698 年）中的 "Rorarius "一文是门德尔松为斯宾诺莎平反策略的重要资料来源；(3) 门德尔松将贝勒作为资料来源构成了受压迫的宗教少数群体之间尚未被探索的联系。为了说明这一点，文章将由一个引言部分和三个后续部分组成，前者是为了确定主题，后者是为了说明我将要论证的每一个观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Scepticism against Intolerance? Moses Mendelssohn and Pierre Bayle’s “Dialogue” on Spinoza in Mendelssohn’s Philosophische Gespräche (1755)

The goal of this article is to argue for the three following theses: (1) that Moses Mendelssohn’s Philosophische Gespräche (1755) offer a rehabilitation of Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) in explicit opposition to the stigmatization that Spinoza suffered in the German lands from the beginning of the 1670s; (2) that the article “Rorarius” from Pierre Bayle’s (1647–1706) Dictionnaire historique et critique (1697–1698) is a crucial source for Mendelssohn’s strategy to rehabilitate Spinoza; (3) that Mendelssohn’s use of Bayle as a source constitutes an unexplored link between oppressed religious minorities. To show this, the article will consist of an introductory part to set the subject matter and three subsequent parts, one for each of the points that I am going to argue for.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

37.50%

发文量

1020

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： Religions (ISSN 2077-1444) is an international, open access scholarly journal, publishing peer reviewed studies of religious thought and practice. It is available online to promote critical, hermeneutical, historical, and constructive conversations. Religions publishes regular research papers, reviews, communications and reports on research projects. In addition, the journal accepts comprehensive book reviews by distinguished authors and discussions of important venues for the publication of scholarly work in the study of religion. Religions aims to serve the interests of a wide range of thoughtful readers and academic scholars of religion, as well as theologians, philosophers, social scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, neuroscientists and others interested in the multidisciplinary study of religions