ALTERNATIVAS SOSTENIBLES PARA EL CONTROL DE Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl EN MANGO

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Arturo Morales Pizarro, Isabel Neira Rojas, Elizabeth Saavedra Alberca, Karla Zapatel Sime, L. A. Álvarez, Ricardo Peña-Castillo, R. Aguilar-Anccota, Miguel Galecio-Julca, J. Javier-Alva
{"title":"ALTERNATIVAS SOSTENIBLES PARA EL CONTROL DE Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl EN MANGO","authors":"Arturo Morales Pizarro, Isabel Neira Rojas, Elizabeth Saavedra Alberca, Karla Zapatel Sime, L. A. Álvarez, Ricardo Peña-Castillo, R. Aguilar-Anccota, Miguel Galecio-Julca, J. Javier-Alva","doi":"10.56369/tsaes.4839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background</strong>: Peru is considered the third largest exporter of mango in the world and Piura is the first mango producing region representing 68% of the national production; however, the fungus <em>Lasiodiplodia theobromae</em> has been associated with dieback and the presence of cankers in mango cultivation, reducing fruit production and quality. <strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate sustainable alternatives for <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> control of <em>L. theobromae</em> in mango, using products based on copper sulfate pentahydrate and a liquid biofertilizer. <strong>Methodology</strong>: Treatments were applied: T0 (Control), T1 (Vacun-Q organic 0.35 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T2 (Vacun-Q organic 0.175 mL 100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T3 (Phyton 27® 0.35 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T4 (Phyton 27® 0.175 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T5 (Biol 10%) and T6 (Biol 20%). Radial growth and mycelial growth inhibition percentage (GIP) of the pathogen were evaluated in the <em>in vitro</em> phase with poisoned media, and necrotic area progression was assessed in the <em>in vivo </em>phase on mango leaves. <strong>Results</strong>: At 72 h after inoculation, treatments T3, T5 and T6 showed the lowest radial growth of <em>L. theobromae</em>, statistically equal to each other and inferior to the control that completed its development in the Petri dish; likewise, they showed 100% GIP. Five days after inoculation of mango leaves, T5 and T6 presented the smallest necrotic areas with 1.44 cm2 and 1.61 cm2 respectively, followed by T4 with 1.64 cm<sup>2</sup> and T2 with 1.69 cm<sup>2</sup> compared to the control with 2.05 cm<sup>2</sup>. <strong>Implications</strong>: In view of the constant restrictions of active molecules, sustainable and innocuous alternatives for humans and the environment are sought for the control of <em>L. theobromae</em>. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Treatments T5 and T6 based on liquid biofertilizers showed to be effective in the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> control of <em>L. theobromae</em>.</p>","PeriodicalId":23259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","volume":"147 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ALTERNATIVAS SOSTENIBLES PARA EL CONTROL DE Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl EN MANGO\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Morales Pizarro, Isabel Neira Rojas, Elizabeth Saavedra Alberca, Karla Zapatel Sime, L. A. Álvarez, Ricardo Peña-Castillo, R. Aguilar-Anccota, Miguel Galecio-Julca, J. Javier-Alva\",\"doi\":\"10.56369/tsaes.4839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background</strong>: Peru is considered the third largest exporter of mango in the world and Piura is the first mango producing region representing 68% of the national production; however, the fungus <em>Lasiodiplodia theobromae</em> has been associated with dieback and the presence of cankers in mango cultivation, reducing fruit production and quality. <strong>Objective</strong>: To evaluate sustainable alternatives for <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> control of <em>L. theobromae</em> in mango, using products based on copper sulfate pentahydrate and a liquid biofertilizer. <strong>Methodology</strong>: Treatments were applied: T0 (Control), T1 (Vacun-Q organic 0.35 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T2 (Vacun-Q organic 0.175 mL 100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T3 (Phyton 27® 0.35 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T4 (Phyton 27® 0.175 mL100 mL<sup>-1</sup>), T5 (Biol 10%) and T6 (Biol 20%). Radial growth and mycelial growth inhibition percentage (GIP) of the pathogen were evaluated in the <em>in vitro</em> phase with poisoned media, and necrotic area progression was assessed in the <em>in vivo </em>phase on mango leaves. <strong>Results</strong>: At 72 h after inoculation, treatments T3, T5 and T6 showed the lowest radial growth of <em>L. theobromae</em>, statistically equal to each other and inferior to the control that completed its development in the Petri dish; likewise, they showed 100% GIP. Five days after inoculation of mango leaves, T5 and T6 presented the smallest necrotic areas with 1.44 cm2 and 1.61 cm2 respectively, followed by T4 with 1.64 cm<sup>2</sup> and T2 with 1.69 cm<sup>2</sup> compared to the control with 2.05 cm<sup>2</sup>. <strong>Implications</strong>: In view of the constant restrictions of active molecules, sustainable and innocuous alternatives for humans and the environment are sought for the control of <em>L. theobromae</em>. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Treatments T5 and T6 based on liquid biofertilizers showed to be effective in the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> control of <em>L. theobromae</em>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems\",\"volume\":\"147 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:秘鲁被认为是世界第三大芒果出口国,皮乌拉(Piura)是秘鲁第一大芒果产区,芒果产量占秘鲁全国产量的 68%。目标:利用基于五水硫酸铜和液体生物肥料的产品,评估在芒果中对 L. theobromae 进行体外和体内控制的可持续替代方法。方法:处理方法T0(对照)、T1(Vacun-Q 有机 0.35 mL100 mL-1)、T2(Vacun-Q 有机 0.175 mL100 mL-1)、T3(Phyton 27® 0.35 mL100 mL-1)、T4(Phyton 27® 0.175 mL100 mL-1)、T5(Biol 10%)和 T6(Biol 20%)。在体外阶段使用有毒培养基评估病原体的径向生长和菌丝生长抑制率(GIP),在体内阶段评估芒果叶片上坏死面积的发展。结果接种后 72 小时,T3、T5 和 T6 处理的 L. theobromae 的径向生长量最低,在统计学上彼此相等,但低于在培养皿中完成发育的对照;同样,它们的 GIP 值为 100%。芒果叶片接种五天后,T5 和 T6 的坏死面积最小,分别为 1.44 平方厘米和 1.61 平方厘米,其次是 T4 的 1.64 平方厘米和 T2 的 1.69 平方厘米,而对照的坏死面积为 2.05 平方厘米。影响:鉴于活性分子不断受到限制,我们正在寻找对人类和环境无害的可持续替代品来控制 L. theobromae。结论基于液态生物肥料的处理方法 T5 和 T6 在体外和体内都能有效控制 L. theobromae。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ALTERNATIVAS SOSTENIBLES PARA EL CONTROL DE Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon & Maubl EN MANGO

Background: Peru is considered the third largest exporter of mango in the world and Piura is the first mango producing region representing 68% of the national production; however, the fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae has been associated with dieback and the presence of cankers in mango cultivation, reducing fruit production and quality. Objective: To evaluate sustainable alternatives for in vitro and in vivo control of L. theobromae in mango, using products based on copper sulfate pentahydrate and a liquid biofertilizer. Methodology: Treatments were applied: T0 (Control), T1 (Vacun-Q organic 0.35 mL100 mL-1), T2 (Vacun-Q organic 0.175 mL 100 mL-1), T3 (Phyton 27® 0.35 mL100 mL-1), T4 (Phyton 27® 0.175 mL100 mL-1), T5 (Biol 10%) and T6 (Biol 20%). Radial growth and mycelial growth inhibition percentage (GIP) of the pathogen were evaluated in the in vitro phase with poisoned media, and necrotic area progression was assessed in the in vivo phase on mango leaves. Results: At 72 h after inoculation, treatments T3, T5 and T6 showed the lowest radial growth of L. theobromae, statistically equal to each other and inferior to the control that completed its development in the Petri dish; likewise, they showed 100% GIP. Five days after inoculation of mango leaves, T5 and T6 presented the smallest necrotic areas with 1.44 cm2 and 1.61 cm2 respectively, followed by T4 with 1.64 cm2 and T2 with 1.69 cm2 compared to the control with 2.05 cm2. Implications: In view of the constant restrictions of active molecules, sustainable and innocuous alternatives for humans and the environment are sought for the control of L. theobromae. Conclusion: Treatments T5 and T6 based on liquid biofertilizers showed to be effective in the in vitro and in vivo control of L. theobromae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is an international peer-reviewed publication devoted to disseminate original information contributing to the understanding and development of agroecosystems in tropical and subtropical areas. The Journal recognizes the multidisciplinary nature of its scope and encourages the submission of original manuscripts from all of the disciplines involved in this area. Original contributions are welcomed in relation to the study of particular components of the agroecosystems (i.e. plant, animal, soil) as well as the resulting interactions and their relationship/impact on society and environment. The journal does not received manuscripts based solely on economic acpects o food technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信