战略管理的当前趋势:SWOT和SOAR方法的比较分析

Pongsiri Kamkankaew
{"title":"战略管理的当前趋势:SWOT和SOAR方法的比较分析","authors":"Pongsiri Kamkankaew","doi":"10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.","PeriodicalId":509459,"journal":{"name":"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CURRENT TRENDS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SWOT AND SOAR APPROACHES\",\"authors\":\"Pongsiri Kamkankaew\",\"doi\":\"10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMUTT GLOBAL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60101/gbafr.2023.269044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 - 本评论文章探讨了战略管理中传统的 SWOT 分析与新兴的 SOAR 框架之间的争论。知识体系 - 研究结果表明,SWOT 和 SOAR 框架都提供了互补的战略管理方法。意义--SWOT 和 SOAR 都是战略框架。SWOT 评估组织的优势、劣势、机会和威胁,侧重于现实评估。SOAR,即优势、机会、愿望和结果,强调潜力和积极性,适合在创新环境中促进发展。原创性/价值--本著作的原创性在于对两种流行的战略框架进行了比较分析,深入探讨了它们在当今动态商业环境中的适用性和有效性。这一分析的价值在于指导组织根据其特定的战略需求选择合适的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CURRENT TRENDS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SWOT AND SOAR APPROACHES
Purpose – This review article explores the debate between traditional SWOT analysis and the emerging SOAR framework in strategic management. It aims to understand their comparative effectiveness in the modern complex business environment.Body of knowledge – The results indicate that both SWOT and SOAR frameworks offer complementary strategic management approaches. SWOT is suitable for initial assessments and discussions, while SOAR is more aligned with innovation, collaboration, and positive organizational change.Implications – SWOT and SOAR are strategic frameworks. SWOT evaluates an organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, focusing on realistic assessment. SOAR, for strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results, emphasizes potential and positivity, suitable for fostering growth in innovative settings.Originality/Value – The originality of this work lies in its comparative analysis of two popular strategic frameworks, providing insights into their applicability and effectiveness in today's dynamic business landscape. The value of this analysis is in guiding organizations to choose the appropriate framework based on their specific strategic needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信