采用混合方法冷却的光伏电池板输出功率和效率的变化

Ömer Karaozan, M. E. Asker
{"title":"采用混合方法冷却的光伏电池板输出功率和效率的变化","authors":"Ömer Karaozan, M. E. Asker","doi":"10.36222/ejt.1404493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the process of generating electrical energy from photovoltaic panels, high ambient temperatures and radiation tend to cause excessive heating of the photovoltaic panel, resulting in a decrease in its efficiency. In this experimental study, two cooling methods were employed. The first method involved active cooling using water, while the second method combined active cooling with passive cooling using an aluminum heat sink, all while using water as the cooling medium. The experiment involved the analysis of changes in electrical output power and efficiency from three identical 100 W monocrystalline photovoltaic panels, one of which served as the reference. The first panel was considered the reference panel. The second panel featured active cooling, with a liquid reservoir created on its rear surface to be filled with transformer oil. Copper pipes were placed at specific intervals within this liquid reservoir, and the rear surface was covered with a thin flat metal plate. The third panel was prepared for the hybrid method, featuring a liquid reservoir covered with a rectangular finned aluminum heat sink, distinct from the second panel. In both methods, transformer oil was used for electrical insulation and thermal conduction between the panel and the copper pipes at the rear. The copper pipes were connected to an automotive radiator and a pump to form a closed circuit. The water inside the radiator was cooled using a radiator fan and circulated by a pump. In the first method, active cooling was achieved by cooling through the radiator, while in the hybrid method, active cooling through the radiator was combined with passive cooling using the rectangular finned aluminum heat sink. In the experiment setup, temperature and liquid flow were measured using radiation, electrical sensors, and other measuring instruments. The data obtained from the measurements were used to compare the increases in electrical power and efficiency of the panels. The electrical power increase and efficiency were calculated as follows: in the hybrid method, it was found to be 4.7% and 0.84%, respectively, while in the active method, it was 2.94% and 0.52%, respectively. The energy consumed in the study was provided by wind energy","PeriodicalId":413929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Technic","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in The Electrical Output Power and Efficiency of A Photovoltaic Panel Cooled by A Hybrid Method\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Karaozan, M. E. Asker\",\"doi\":\"10.36222/ejt.1404493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the process of generating electrical energy from photovoltaic panels, high ambient temperatures and radiation tend to cause excessive heating of the photovoltaic panel, resulting in a decrease in its efficiency. In this experimental study, two cooling methods were employed. The first method involved active cooling using water, while the second method combined active cooling with passive cooling using an aluminum heat sink, all while using water as the cooling medium. The experiment involved the analysis of changes in electrical output power and efficiency from three identical 100 W monocrystalline photovoltaic panels, one of which served as the reference. The first panel was considered the reference panel. The second panel featured active cooling, with a liquid reservoir created on its rear surface to be filled with transformer oil. Copper pipes were placed at specific intervals within this liquid reservoir, and the rear surface was covered with a thin flat metal plate. The third panel was prepared for the hybrid method, featuring a liquid reservoir covered with a rectangular finned aluminum heat sink, distinct from the second panel. In both methods, transformer oil was used for electrical insulation and thermal conduction between the panel and the copper pipes at the rear. The copper pipes were connected to an automotive radiator and a pump to form a closed circuit. The water inside the radiator was cooled using a radiator fan and circulated by a pump. In the first method, active cooling was achieved by cooling through the radiator, while in the hybrid method, active cooling through the radiator was combined with passive cooling using the rectangular finned aluminum heat sink. In the experiment setup, temperature and liquid flow were measured using radiation, electrical sensors, and other measuring instruments. The data obtained from the measurements were used to compare the increases in electrical power and efficiency of the panels. The electrical power increase and efficiency were calculated as follows: in the hybrid method, it was found to be 4.7% and 0.84%, respectively, while in the active method, it was 2.94% and 0.52%, respectively. The energy consumed in the study was provided by wind energy\",\"PeriodicalId\":413929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Technic\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Technic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1404493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Technic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1404493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在光伏电池板产生电能的过程中,高环境温度和辐射容易导致光伏电池板过度发热,从而降低其效率。在这项实验研究中,采用了两种冷却方法。第一种方法是使用水进行主动冷却,第二种方法是将主动冷却与使用铝制散热器进行被动冷却相结合,同时使用水作为冷却介质。实验包括分析三个相同的 100 瓦单晶硅光伏电池板的输出功率和效率的变化,其中一个电池板作为参考。第一块面板被视为参考面板。第二块电池板采用了主动冷却技术,在其后表面创建了一个储液器,注入变压器油。铜管以特定的间隔放置在储液器中,后表面则覆盖了一层薄薄的金属平板。第三块面板是为混合方法准备的,其特点是储液器上覆盖着一个矩形的铝制散热片,与第二块面板不同。在这两种方法中,变压器油都用于电气绝缘和面板与后部铜管之间的热传导。铜管与汽车散热器和水泵相连,形成一个闭合回路。散热器内的水通过散热器风扇冷却,并由水泵循环。在第一种方法中,主动冷却是通过散热器实现的,而在混合方法中,通过散热器的主动冷却与使用矩形翅片铝散热器的被动冷却相结合。在实验装置中,使用辐射、电子传感器和其他测量仪器测量了温度和液体流量。测量获得的数据用于比较电池板的电功率和效率的增加。计算得出的电功率增幅和效率如下:混合式方法的电功率增幅和效率分别为 4.7% 和 0.84%,而主动式方法的电功率增幅和效率分别为 2.94% 和 0.52%。研究中消耗的能源由风能提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in The Electrical Output Power and Efficiency of A Photovoltaic Panel Cooled by A Hybrid Method
During the process of generating electrical energy from photovoltaic panels, high ambient temperatures and radiation tend to cause excessive heating of the photovoltaic panel, resulting in a decrease in its efficiency. In this experimental study, two cooling methods were employed. The first method involved active cooling using water, while the second method combined active cooling with passive cooling using an aluminum heat sink, all while using water as the cooling medium. The experiment involved the analysis of changes in electrical output power and efficiency from three identical 100 W monocrystalline photovoltaic panels, one of which served as the reference. The first panel was considered the reference panel. The second panel featured active cooling, with a liquid reservoir created on its rear surface to be filled with transformer oil. Copper pipes were placed at specific intervals within this liquid reservoir, and the rear surface was covered with a thin flat metal plate. The third panel was prepared for the hybrid method, featuring a liquid reservoir covered with a rectangular finned aluminum heat sink, distinct from the second panel. In both methods, transformer oil was used for electrical insulation and thermal conduction between the panel and the copper pipes at the rear. The copper pipes were connected to an automotive radiator and a pump to form a closed circuit. The water inside the radiator was cooled using a radiator fan and circulated by a pump. In the first method, active cooling was achieved by cooling through the radiator, while in the hybrid method, active cooling through the radiator was combined with passive cooling using the rectangular finned aluminum heat sink. In the experiment setup, temperature and liquid flow were measured using radiation, electrical sensors, and other measuring instruments. The data obtained from the measurements were used to compare the increases in electrical power and efficiency of the panels. The electrical power increase and efficiency were calculated as follows: in the hybrid method, it was found to be 4.7% and 0.84%, respectively, while in the active method, it was 2.94% and 0.52%, respectively. The energy consumed in the study was provided by wind energy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信