在医学学术项目中实施认证标准是信任高等教育的必要条件:沙特阿拉伯王国卡西姆大学两个学术项目的经验

Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein
{"title":"在医学学术项目中实施认证标准是信任高等教育的必要条件:沙特阿拉伯王国卡西姆大学两个学术项目的经验","authors":"Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein","doi":"10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Quality assurance (QA) is becoming more critical in higher education (HE) worldwide. Quality in HE can be managed by QA, quality improvement, and quality control. This systematic review demonstrates the benefits of QA and academic accreditation in HE by examining the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation standards and two accredited academic programs at Qassim University (QU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) e-library was used to collect and retrieve literature from December 2022 to January 2023. Only English-language full-text papers were reviewed and cited. Results: To assure medical education quality and encourage healthcare workforce confidence, medical educational institutions must be overseen by a QA system, such as a formal accreditation system. The World Federation of Medical Education set “Trilogy” global standards for quality improvement in medical education. The ambitious “Vision 2030” of KSA invests a large percentage of its Gross Domestic Product in education to address the significant challenges of educational quality management. The sole statutory organization in KSA that evaluates and accredits all public and private HE institutions and programs is the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA). The NCAAA’s accreditation standards are generally acknowledged as good practice in HE worldwide and have been adapted to KSA higher education’s special circumstances. NCAAA has recently granted accreditation to two academic programs offered by the College of Applied Medical Sciences, QU. Conclusion: Accreditation promotes “added value” under the win-win-win “WWW” paradigm, where stakeholders win first, then the program, and finally the community.","PeriodicalId":132580,"journal":{"name":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","volume":" 117","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Accreditation Standards in Academic Medical Programs is Necessary to Trust Higher Education: The Experience of Two Academic Programs at Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Abdelmarouf Hassan Mohieldein\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Quality assurance (QA) is becoming more critical in higher education (HE) worldwide. Quality in HE can be managed by QA, quality improvement, and quality control. This systematic review demonstrates the benefits of QA and academic accreditation in HE by examining the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation standards and two accredited academic programs at Qassim University (QU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) e-library was used to collect and retrieve literature from December 2022 to January 2023. Only English-language full-text papers were reviewed and cited. Results: To assure medical education quality and encourage healthcare workforce confidence, medical educational institutions must be overseen by a QA system, such as a formal accreditation system. The World Federation of Medical Education set “Trilogy” global standards for quality improvement in medical education. The ambitious “Vision 2030” of KSA invests a large percentage of its Gross Domestic Product in education to address the significant challenges of educational quality management. The sole statutory organization in KSA that evaluates and accredits all public and private HE institutions and programs is the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA). The NCAAA’s accreditation standards are generally acknowledged as good practice in HE worldwide and have been adapted to KSA higher education’s special circumstances. NCAAA has recently granted accreditation to two academic programs offered by the College of Applied Medical Sciences, QU. Conclusion: Accreditation promotes “added value” under the win-win-win “WWW” paradigm, where stakeholders win first, then the program, and finally the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudan journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" 117\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudan journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质量保证(QA)在全球高等教育(HE)中变得越来越重要。高等教育的质量可以通过质量保证、质量改进和质量控制来管理。本系统综述通过研究沙特阿拉伯王国卡西姆大学(QU)的国家学术认证与评估委员会(NCAAA)认证标准和两个认证学术项目,展示了高等教育质量保证和学术认证的益处。 方法:使用 Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) 电子图书馆收集和检索 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 1 月期间的文献。只审查和引用了英文全文论文。 结果为确保医学教育质量并鼓励医护人员的信心,医学教育机构必须接受质量保证系统的监督,如正式的认证系统。世界医学教育联合会制定了提高医学教育质量的 "三部曲 "全球标准。阿联酋雄心勃勃的 "2030 愿景 "将其国内生产总值的很大一部分投资于教育,以应对教育质量管理方面的重大挑战。国家学术认证与评估委员会(NCAAA)是对所有公立和私立高等教育机构和项目进行评估和认证的唯一法定组织。NCAAA 的认证标准被公认为全球高等教育的良好做法,并根据 KSA 高等教育的特殊情况进行了调整。NCAAA 最近对昆士兰应用医学科学学院开设的两个学术课程进行了认证。 结论在三赢的 "WWW "范式下,认证促进了 "附加值",利益相关者首先获胜,然后是课程,最后是社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing Accreditation Standards in Academic Medical Programs is Necessary to Trust Higher Education: The Experience of Two Academic Programs at Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Background: Quality assurance (QA) is becoming more critical in higher education (HE) worldwide. Quality in HE can be managed by QA, quality improvement, and quality control. This systematic review demonstrates the benefits of QA and academic accreditation in HE by examining the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation standards and two accredited academic programs at Qassim University (QU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) e-library was used to collect and retrieve literature from December 2022 to January 2023. Only English-language full-text papers were reviewed and cited. Results: To assure medical education quality and encourage healthcare workforce confidence, medical educational institutions must be overseen by a QA system, such as a formal accreditation system. The World Federation of Medical Education set “Trilogy” global standards for quality improvement in medical education. The ambitious “Vision 2030” of KSA invests a large percentage of its Gross Domestic Product in education to address the significant challenges of educational quality management. The sole statutory organization in KSA that evaluates and accredits all public and private HE institutions and programs is the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA). The NCAAA’s accreditation standards are generally acknowledged as good practice in HE worldwide and have been adapted to KSA higher education’s special circumstances. NCAAA has recently granted accreditation to two academic programs offered by the College of Applied Medical Sciences, QU. Conclusion: Accreditation promotes “added value” under the win-win-win “WWW” paradigm, where stakeholders win first, then the program, and finally the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信