苏丹泌尿科医生对前列腺特异抗原检测的认识、实践和态度

Mosab Alzubier, Raed Abdullah Alasmi, Eltahir hir Ahmed Elta
{"title":"苏丹泌尿科医生对前列腺特异抗原检测的认识、实践和态度","authors":"Mosab Alzubier, Raed Abdullah Alasmi, Eltahir hir Ahmed Elta","doi":"10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, there is a wide variation in the daily practice of PSA testing with ongoing efforts to increase its sensitivity. This study aims to evaluate the attitude of Sudanese urologists toward the PSA test in their daily practice. Methods: An online questionnaire was formed and sent to the academic group of Sudanese urologists; it was left for two months with weekly reminders. The group contains 135 members. Data were then collected and analyzed. Results: Of the 135 members, 83 (61.5%) responded to the questionnaire, all were males, with 43% of them being consultants, and 37% having an experience between 5 and 10 years. Most participants (85%) use the test according to international guidelines, the majority (60%) counsel patients before the test, with 72% finding the test more than 50% reliable. In addition, >33% face problems when requesting PSA with >29% of them finding it unreliable. Moreover, in >13%, the test is unavailable. Nearly all participants (95%) think that there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of PSA tests. Conclusion: For the diversity of practice toward the PSA test and the unavailability of adjunct methods that increase its sensitivity, there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of the test in the context of other clinical factors.","PeriodicalId":132580,"journal":{"name":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","volume":" 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception, Practice, and Attitude Toward Prostate-specific Antigen Test Among Sudanese Urologists\",\"authors\":\"Mosab Alzubier, Raed Abdullah Alasmi, Eltahir hir Ahmed Elta\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, there is a wide variation in the daily practice of PSA testing with ongoing efforts to increase its sensitivity. This study aims to evaluate the attitude of Sudanese urologists toward the PSA test in their daily practice. Methods: An online questionnaire was formed and sent to the academic group of Sudanese urologists; it was left for two months with weekly reminders. The group contains 135 members. Data were then collected and analyzed. Results: Of the 135 members, 83 (61.5%) responded to the questionnaire, all were males, with 43% of them being consultants, and 37% having an experience between 5 and 10 years. Most participants (85%) use the test according to international guidelines, the majority (60%) counsel patients before the test, with 72% finding the test more than 50% reliable. In addition, >33% face problems when requesting PSA with >29% of them finding it unreliable. Moreover, in >13%, the test is unavailable. Nearly all participants (95%) think that there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of PSA tests. Conclusion: For the diversity of practice toward the PSA test and the unavailability of adjunct methods that increase its sensitivity, there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of the test in the context of other clinical factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sudan journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" 32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sudan journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudan journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v18i4.14728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的问世彻底改变了前列腺癌(PC)的诊断方法。然而,随着人们不断努力提高 PSA 的灵敏度,在 PSA 检测的日常实践中存在着很大的差异。本研究旨在评估苏丹泌尿科医生在日常工作中对 PSA 检测的态度。 研究方法制作在线问卷并发送给苏丹泌尿科医生学术小组;问卷留存两个月,每周提醒一次。该小组共有 135 名成员。然后收集并分析数据。 结果:在 135 名成员中,83 人(61.5%)对问卷做出了回复,全部为男性,其中 43% 为顾问,37% 的经验在 5 至 10 年之间。大多数参与者(85%)根据国际指南使用测试,大多数参与者(60%)在测试前为患者提供咨询,72%的参与者认为测试的可靠性超过 50%。此外,超过 33% 的人在申请 PSA 时遇到问题,其中超过 29% 的人认为 PSA 不可靠。此外,超过 13% 的人无法获得该检测。几乎所有参与者(95%)都认为有必要制定国家指南来规范 PSA 检测的使用。 结论由于对 PSA 检测的做法多种多样,而且没有提高其灵敏度的辅助方法,因此有必要制定国家指南,结合其他临床因素来规范 PSA 检测的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception, Practice, and Attitude Toward Prostate-specific Antigen Test Among Sudanese Urologists
Background: The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). However, there is a wide variation in the daily practice of PSA testing with ongoing efforts to increase its sensitivity. This study aims to evaluate the attitude of Sudanese urologists toward the PSA test in their daily practice. Methods: An online questionnaire was formed and sent to the academic group of Sudanese urologists; it was left for two months with weekly reminders. The group contains 135 members. Data were then collected and analyzed. Results: Of the 135 members, 83 (61.5%) responded to the questionnaire, all were males, with 43% of them being consultants, and 37% having an experience between 5 and 10 years. Most participants (85%) use the test according to international guidelines, the majority (60%) counsel patients before the test, with 72% finding the test more than 50% reliable. In addition, >33% face problems when requesting PSA with >29% of them finding it unreliable. Moreover, in >13%, the test is unavailable. Nearly all participants (95%) think that there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of PSA tests. Conclusion: For the diversity of practice toward the PSA test and the unavailability of adjunct methods that increase its sensitivity, there is a need for national guidelines to regulate the use of the test in the context of other clinical factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信