高等教育的领导力与创新:大学管理活动的特点

Q4 Decision Sciences
Jesús Enrique Beltrán Virgüez, Jhony Alexander Barrera Lievano, Sandra Patricia Cote Daza
{"title":"高等教育的领导力与创新:大学管理活动的特点","authors":"Jesús Enrique Beltrán Virgüez, Jhony Alexander Barrera Lievano, Sandra Patricia Cote Daza","doi":"10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.3941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The research focuses on identifying managerial practices in higher education and their connection to innovation in order to establish diagnostic and reflective elements regarding managerial activities in the university. Finally, it is crucial to interpret the results within the specific context and the value that managers bring to academic activities.   Theoretical Framework: There are not enough studies associated with managerial practice in higher education, let alone focused on innovation. The main references in managerial practice refer to Mintzberg. In terms of innovation management, various models and alternatives are presented in both the management and education domains.     Design/Methodology/Approach: The research has a qualitative descriptive hermeneutic approach and used a non-probabilistic sample of 20 executives from 5 higher education institutions, who were provided with a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, observation processes and dialogue with 6 executives were conducted to delve deeper into the obtained information and carry out a more detailed hermeneutic process.   Findings: The managerial practice in higher education institutions is far from consistently incorporating innovation into their activities. The analyzed institutions show a low presence of innovation management methods, indicating that they do not have a clear development path. Among some of the needs prevailing in the studied organizations is the incorporation of innovation in the design of managerial positions and functions, as well as the ability to allocate specific periods of time to address innovation.   Research, Practical & Social Implications: The research proposes elements to evaluate within the organization and projects elements to strengthen managerial activity in higher education, as well as to improve decision-making.   Originality/Value: Research on managerial practice is not abundant, and even less so within the framework of higher education. Therefore, it is essential to replicate this type of work to understand the reality of organizations","PeriodicalId":31480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leadership and Innovation in Higher Education: a Characterization of Managerial Activities in the University\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Enrique Beltrán Virgüez, Jhony Alexander Barrera Lievano, Sandra Patricia Cote Daza\",\"doi\":\"10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.3941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The research focuses on identifying managerial practices in higher education and their connection to innovation in order to establish diagnostic and reflective elements regarding managerial activities in the university. Finally, it is crucial to interpret the results within the specific context and the value that managers bring to academic activities.   Theoretical Framework: There are not enough studies associated with managerial practice in higher education, let alone focused on innovation. The main references in managerial practice refer to Mintzberg. In terms of innovation management, various models and alternatives are presented in both the management and education domains.     Design/Methodology/Approach: The research has a qualitative descriptive hermeneutic approach and used a non-probabilistic sample of 20 executives from 5 higher education institutions, who were provided with a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, observation processes and dialogue with 6 executives were conducted to delve deeper into the obtained information and carry out a more detailed hermeneutic process.   Findings: The managerial practice in higher education institutions is far from consistently incorporating innovation into their activities. The analyzed institutions show a low presence of innovation management methods, indicating that they do not have a clear development path. Among some of the needs prevailing in the studied organizations is the incorporation of innovation in the design of managerial positions and functions, as well as the ability to allocate specific periods of time to address innovation.   Research, Practical & Social Implications: The research proposes elements to evaluate within the organization and projects elements to strengthen managerial activity in higher education, as well as to improve decision-making.   Originality/Value: Research on managerial practice is not abundant, and even less so within the framework of higher education. Therefore, it is essential to replicate this type of work to understand the reality of organizations\",\"PeriodicalId\":31480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Professional Business Review\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Professional Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.3941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.3941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的重点是确定高等教育中的管理实践及其与创新的联系,从而建立有关大学管理活动的诊断和反思要素。最后,在特定背景下解释研究结果以及管理者为学术活动带来的价值至关重要。 理论框架:与高等教育管理实践相关的研究不足,更不用说以创新为重点的研究了。管理实践方面的主要参考文献是明茨伯格(Mintzberg)。在创新管理方面,管理和教育领域都提出了各种模式和备选方案。 设计/方法/途径:本研究采用定性描述诠释法,对来自 5 所高等教育机构的 20 名管理人员进行了非概率抽样调查,并向他们提供了一份自填问卷。此外,还对 6 名管理人员进行了观察和对话,以深入了解所获得的信息,并开展更详细的诠释过程。 研究结果高等院校的管理实践远未持续将创新纳入其活动中。所分析的院校很少采用创新管理方法,这表明它们没有明确的发展道路。在所研究的机构中,普遍存在的一些需求是将创新纳入管理职位和职能的设计中,以及能够分配特定的时间段来解决创新问题。 研究、实践和社会影响:本研究提出了在组织内部进行评估的要素,以及加强高等教育管理活动和改进决策的项目要素。 原创性/价值:有关管理实践的研究并不多,在高等教育框架内的研究就更少了。因此,有必要推广这类工作,以了解各组织的实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leadership and Innovation in Higher Education: a Characterization of Managerial Activities in the University
Purpose: The research focuses on identifying managerial practices in higher education and their connection to innovation in order to establish diagnostic and reflective elements regarding managerial activities in the university. Finally, it is crucial to interpret the results within the specific context and the value that managers bring to academic activities.   Theoretical Framework: There are not enough studies associated with managerial practice in higher education, let alone focused on innovation. The main references in managerial practice refer to Mintzberg. In terms of innovation management, various models and alternatives are presented in both the management and education domains.     Design/Methodology/Approach: The research has a qualitative descriptive hermeneutic approach and used a non-probabilistic sample of 20 executives from 5 higher education institutions, who were provided with a self-administered questionnaire. Additionally, observation processes and dialogue with 6 executives were conducted to delve deeper into the obtained information and carry out a more detailed hermeneutic process.   Findings: The managerial practice in higher education institutions is far from consistently incorporating innovation into their activities. The analyzed institutions show a low presence of innovation management methods, indicating that they do not have a clear development path. Among some of the needs prevailing in the studied organizations is the incorporation of innovation in the design of managerial positions and functions, as well as the ability to allocate specific periods of time to address innovation.   Research, Practical & Social Implications: The research proposes elements to evaluate within the organization and projects elements to strengthen managerial activity in higher education, as well as to improve decision-making.   Originality/Value: Research on managerial practice is not abundant, and even less so within the framework of higher education. Therefore, it is essential to replicate this type of work to understand the reality of organizations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Professional Business Review
International Journal of Professional Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信