埃及阿斯旺省肉鸡生产的经济效益

Salwa Abdelmonem, Mohamed Sayed Shehata, Osama Mahmoud M. Zaatar, Yousra Attia
{"title":"埃及阿斯旺省肉鸡生产的经济效益","authors":"Salwa Abdelmonem, Mohamed Sayed Shehata, Osama Mahmoud M. Zaatar, Yousra Attia","doi":"10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2023.320594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aimed to estimate the production functions of two breeding systems and the preferences between them by analyzing the primary data of the field study sample, a comparative study between the two breeding systems, and estimating the production functions and costs for each system separately. The research found that the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 9 chicks per square meter, while the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 15 chicks per square meter, which demonstrates the high density in this system. It was also shown that the percentage of dead birds at the end of the cycle in the semi-closed system amounted to about 6% of the total chicks, while the percentage of dead ones at the end of the cycle in the average semi-closed system was about 4% of the total chicks, which shows the low percentage of dead ones in the average semi-closed system, and it became clear that the average amount of feed consumed In the semi-closed system, it was about 4.8 kg per chick, while the average amount of feed consumed in the average semi-closed system was about 4.1 kg per chick. The feed conversion efficiency in the semi-closed system was about 60%, while the feed conversion efficiency in the system was about 4.1 kg per chick. the semi-closed system rate is about 74%, which shows the high rate of food conversion, which provides large amounts of feed, which is a major problem these days in terms of their availability and prices. It was also shown that the total costs in the semi-closed system amounted to about 55 pounds per chick, while the costs amounted to the average total revenue in the semi-closed system was about 47.5 pounds per chick. The total revenues in the semi-closed system amounted to about 60 pounds per chick, while the total revenues in the average semi-closed system amounted to about 69.2 pounds per chick. Studying the difference between the two systems using formal variables shows an increase and superiority of the semi-closed system modified due to the closed system in the density of birds, the percentage of vitality, the average weight of the bird, the rate of production efficiency, and total revenues in pounds, and a decrease in it in each of the total variable costs in pounds, the total costs in pounds, and the amount of feed User for each bird. It was also shown from the total output function of the modified semi-closed system that the most important production elements that have a significant impact on the total output of one cycle of chicken farms in broiler houses is the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle, whereas in the semi-closed system it was the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle and bird density. The cost elasticity for the modified semi-closed system was 0.87, while for the semi-closed system it was 0.99.","PeriodicalId":7560,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Science Exchange Journal","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economics of Broiler Chicken Production in Egypt, Aswan Governorate\",\"authors\":\"Salwa Abdelmonem, Mohamed Sayed Shehata, Osama Mahmoud M. Zaatar, Yousra Attia\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2023.320594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research aimed to estimate the production functions of two breeding systems and the preferences between them by analyzing the primary data of the field study sample, a comparative study between the two breeding systems, and estimating the production functions and costs for each system separately. The research found that the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 9 chicks per square meter, while the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 15 chicks per square meter, which demonstrates the high density in this system. It was also shown that the percentage of dead birds at the end of the cycle in the semi-closed system amounted to about 6% of the total chicks, while the percentage of dead ones at the end of the cycle in the average semi-closed system was about 4% of the total chicks, which shows the low percentage of dead ones in the average semi-closed system, and it became clear that the average amount of feed consumed In the semi-closed system, it was about 4.8 kg per chick, while the average amount of feed consumed in the average semi-closed system was about 4.1 kg per chick. The feed conversion efficiency in the semi-closed system was about 60%, while the feed conversion efficiency in the system was about 4.1 kg per chick. the semi-closed system rate is about 74%, which shows the high rate of food conversion, which provides large amounts of feed, which is a major problem these days in terms of their availability and prices. It was also shown that the total costs in the semi-closed system amounted to about 55 pounds per chick, while the costs amounted to the average total revenue in the semi-closed system was about 47.5 pounds per chick. The total revenues in the semi-closed system amounted to about 60 pounds per chick, while the total revenues in the average semi-closed system amounted to about 69.2 pounds per chick. Studying the difference between the two systems using formal variables shows an increase and superiority of the semi-closed system modified due to the closed system in the density of birds, the percentage of vitality, the average weight of the bird, the rate of production efficiency, and total revenues in pounds, and a decrease in it in each of the total variable costs in pounds, the total costs in pounds, and the amount of feed User for each bird. It was also shown from the total output function of the modified semi-closed system that the most important production elements that have a significant impact on the total output of one cycle of chicken farms in broiler houses is the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle, whereas in the semi-closed system it was the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle and bird density. The cost elasticity for the modified semi-closed system was 0.87, while for the semi-closed system it was 0.99.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alexandria Science Exchange Journal\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alexandria Science Exchange Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2023.320594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Science Exchange Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2023.320594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在通过分析实地考察样本的原始数据,对两种养殖系统进行比较研究,并分别估算两种养殖系统的生产函数和成本,从而估算出两种养殖系统的生产函数以及它们之间的优选关系。研究发现,半封闭系统的平均雏鸡数量约为每平方米 9 只,而半封闭系统的平均雏鸡数量约为每平方米 15 只,这表明该系统的密度较高。此外,半封闭育雏系统周期结束时的死雏比例约为总雏数的 6%,而普通半封闭育雏系统周期结束时的死雏比例约为总雏数的 4%,这表明普通半封闭育雏系统的死雏比例较低。每只雏鸡的平均饲料消耗量约为 4.8 千克,而普通半封闭系统中每只雏鸡的平均饲料消耗量约为 4.1 千克。半封闭系统的饲料转化效率约为 60%,而一般半封闭系统的饲料转化效率约为每只雏鸡 4.1 公斤。半封闭系统的转化率约为 74%,这表明食物转化率很高,可提供大量饲料,而这正是目前饲料供应和价格方面的一个主要问题。研究还表明,半封闭系统的总成本约为每只雏鸡 55 磅,而半封闭系统的平均总收入约为每只雏鸡 47.5 磅。半封闭系统的总收入约为每只雏鸡 60 磅,而半封闭系统的平均总收入约为每只雏鸡 69.2 磅。利用形式变量研究两种系统之间的差异表明,半封闭系统在雏鸡密度、活力百分比、雏鸡平均体重、生产效率和总收入(以磅为单位)方面均优于封闭系统,而在总可变成本(以磅为单位)、总成本(以磅为单位)和每只雏鸡的饲料使用量方面均低于封闭系统。改进型半封闭系统的总产出函数还表明,对肉鸡舍养鸡场一个周期的总产出有重大影响的最重要生产要素是整个生产周期的饲料供应量,而在半封闭系统中,则是整个生产周期的饲料供应量和禽鸟密度。改良半封闭系统的成本弹性为 0.87,而半封闭系统的成本弹性为 0.99。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economics of Broiler Chicken Production in Egypt, Aswan Governorate
The research aimed to estimate the production functions of two breeding systems and the preferences between them by analyzing the primary data of the field study sample, a comparative study between the two breeding systems, and estimating the production functions and costs for each system separately. The research found that the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 9 chicks per square meter, while the average number of chicks in the semi-closed system was about 15 chicks per square meter, which demonstrates the high density in this system. It was also shown that the percentage of dead birds at the end of the cycle in the semi-closed system amounted to about 6% of the total chicks, while the percentage of dead ones at the end of the cycle in the average semi-closed system was about 4% of the total chicks, which shows the low percentage of dead ones in the average semi-closed system, and it became clear that the average amount of feed consumed In the semi-closed system, it was about 4.8 kg per chick, while the average amount of feed consumed in the average semi-closed system was about 4.1 kg per chick. The feed conversion efficiency in the semi-closed system was about 60%, while the feed conversion efficiency in the system was about 4.1 kg per chick. the semi-closed system rate is about 74%, which shows the high rate of food conversion, which provides large amounts of feed, which is a major problem these days in terms of their availability and prices. It was also shown that the total costs in the semi-closed system amounted to about 55 pounds per chick, while the costs amounted to the average total revenue in the semi-closed system was about 47.5 pounds per chick. The total revenues in the semi-closed system amounted to about 60 pounds per chick, while the total revenues in the average semi-closed system amounted to about 69.2 pounds per chick. Studying the difference between the two systems using formal variables shows an increase and superiority of the semi-closed system modified due to the closed system in the density of birds, the percentage of vitality, the average weight of the bird, the rate of production efficiency, and total revenues in pounds, and a decrease in it in each of the total variable costs in pounds, the total costs in pounds, and the amount of feed User for each bird. It was also shown from the total output function of the modified semi-closed system that the most important production elements that have a significant impact on the total output of one cycle of chicken farms in broiler houses is the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle, whereas in the semi-closed system it was the amount of feed provided throughout the production cycle and bird density. The cost elasticity for the modified semi-closed system was 0.87, while for the semi-closed system it was 0.99.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信