金诺果园地面覆盖物管理研究

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Manpreet Singh, Kanwaljit Singh, Veerpartap Singh
{"title":"金诺果园地面覆盖物管理研究","authors":"Manpreet Singh, Kanwaljit Singh, Veerpartap Singh","doi":"10.58993/ijh/2023.80.4.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The six ground-cover species viz. aloe vera, brahmi, lemongrass, mentha, stevia and turmeric, were grownin the kinnow orchard. The cultivation of mentha, intercropped with kinnow, exhibited better performance interms of fruit length (5.81cm), fruit breadth (6.77 cm), fruit weight (156.50 g) and fruit yield (61.04 Kg), followedby brahmi as compared to other treatments. The quality attributes like juice content, total soluble solids (TSS),titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA of fruits grown under different intercropping systems were statistically at parwith control during the first year of study. However, the highest juice content (46.32 %), TSS (11.28 %), TSS/TA(14.25) and minimum TA (0.79 %) were recorded in kinnow intercropped with mentha. The highest leaf N contentwas recorded in the cover crops of Kinnow + mentha (1.97 %), P and K content in Kinnow + brahmi (0.20 and1.35 %, respectively), while these were found to be the lowest in control. Overall, Kinnow + mentha and Kinnow+ brahmi proved to be effective intercropping systems in the Kinnow growing areas","PeriodicalId":13449,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Horticulture","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground-cover management studies in kinnow orchard\",\"authors\":\"Manpreet Singh, Kanwaljit Singh, Veerpartap Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.58993/ijh/2023.80.4.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The six ground-cover species viz. aloe vera, brahmi, lemongrass, mentha, stevia and turmeric, were grownin the kinnow orchard. The cultivation of mentha, intercropped with kinnow, exhibited better performance interms of fruit length (5.81cm), fruit breadth (6.77 cm), fruit weight (156.50 g) and fruit yield (61.04 Kg), followedby brahmi as compared to other treatments. The quality attributes like juice content, total soluble solids (TSS),titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA of fruits grown under different intercropping systems were statistically at parwith control during the first year of study. However, the highest juice content (46.32 %), TSS (11.28 %), TSS/TA(14.25) and minimum TA (0.79 %) were recorded in kinnow intercropped with mentha. The highest leaf N contentwas recorded in the cover crops of Kinnow + mentha (1.97 %), P and K content in Kinnow + brahmi (0.20 and1.35 %, respectively), while these were found to be the lowest in control. Overall, Kinnow + mentha and Kinnow+ brahmi proved to be effective intercropping systems in the Kinnow growing areas\",\"PeriodicalId\":13449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Horticulture\",\"volume\":\" 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Horticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.4.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2023.80.4.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在金诺果园中种植了六种地被植物,即芦荟、婆婆纳、柠檬草、薄荷、甜叶菊和姜黄。与其他处理相比,在金诺果园间作种植薄荷,在果实长度(5.81 厘米)、果实宽度(6.77 厘米)、果实重量(156.50 克)和果实产量(61.04 公斤)方面表现较好,其次是婆婆纳。在研究的第一年,不同间作系统下种植的水果的果汁含量、总可溶性固形物(TSS)、可滴定酸度(TA)和 TSS/TA 等质量属性在统计上与对照组相当。然而,与薄荷间作的金诺果汁含量(46.32 %)、TSS(11.28 %)、TSS/TA(14.25)最高,TA(0.79 %)最低。金诺+薄荷覆盖作物的叶片氮含量最高(1.97 %),金诺+婆婆纳的叶片磷和钾含量最高(分别为 0.20 % 和 1.35 %),而对照组的叶片磷和钾含量最低。总之,在金翘种植区,金翘+薄荷和金翘+红豆被证明是有效的间作系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ground-cover management studies in kinnow orchard
The six ground-cover species viz. aloe vera, brahmi, lemongrass, mentha, stevia and turmeric, were grownin the kinnow orchard. The cultivation of mentha, intercropped with kinnow, exhibited better performance interms of fruit length (5.81cm), fruit breadth (6.77 cm), fruit weight (156.50 g) and fruit yield (61.04 Kg), followedby brahmi as compared to other treatments. The quality attributes like juice content, total soluble solids (TSS),titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA of fruits grown under different intercropping systems were statistically at parwith control during the first year of study. However, the highest juice content (46.32 %), TSS (11.28 %), TSS/TA(14.25) and minimum TA (0.79 %) were recorded in kinnow intercropped with mentha. The highest leaf N contentwas recorded in the cover crops of Kinnow + mentha (1.97 %), P and K content in Kinnow + brahmi (0.20 and1.35 %, respectively), while these were found to be the lowest in control. Overall, Kinnow + mentha and Kinnow+ brahmi proved to be effective intercropping systems in the Kinnow growing areas
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Horticulture
Indian Journal of Horticulture 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信