使用 NorSand 构成模型进行尾矿库应力应变模拟和流动液化评估的数值敏感性分析

Filipe Costa, B. Delgado, Breno Castilho
{"title":"使用 NorSand 构成模型进行尾矿库应力应变模拟和流动液化评估的数值敏感性分析","authors":"Filipe Costa, B. Delgado, Breno Castilho","doi":"10.28927/sr.2024.011322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of critical state Soil Mechanics (CSSM), the void ratio began to be recognized as a key parameter, along with the stress state, which defines the mechanical behavior of soils and other particulate geomaterials by using the state parameter. The state parameter is the difference between the current and critical void ratio so that its definition requires the critical state line (CSL) identification. This work presents numerical calibration results, using the NorSand constitutive model, from three sets of triaxial compression tests selected from the literature. The SIGMA/W module of the Geostudio® System was adopted to perform the simulations of the triaxial compression tests, and the results showed adequate fit between real tests and numerical simulations. The parameters necessary for the modeling with NorSand model, defined from the numerical calibration, were used in a stress-strain evaluation of a hypothetical upstream tailings dam. These simulations allowed the evaluation of the differences in the tailings storage facility (TSF) responses in terms of both deformation behavior and flow liquefaction instability. Flow liquefaction instability is described in the literature as a complete loss in shear strength and the development of excessive strains due to the contractive response of tailings when subjected to low confining stress. The results suggest that the use of the NorSand model is, in general, a good option to reproduce the typical strain-softening behavior of such structures. Furthermore, it was clear the high sensitivity of the constitutive model parameters, drawing attention to the importance of best laboratory practices for carrying out triaxial tests to obtain reliable parameters for NorSand modeling.","PeriodicalId":507352,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Rocks","volume":" 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical sensitivity analysis for stress-strain simulation and flow liquefaction assessment of tailings storage facilities using the NorSand constitutive model\",\"authors\":\"Filipe Costa, B. Delgado, Breno Castilho\",\"doi\":\"10.28927/sr.2024.011322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of critical state Soil Mechanics (CSSM), the void ratio began to be recognized as a key parameter, along with the stress state, which defines the mechanical behavior of soils and other particulate geomaterials by using the state parameter. The state parameter is the difference between the current and critical void ratio so that its definition requires the critical state line (CSL) identification. This work presents numerical calibration results, using the NorSand constitutive model, from three sets of triaxial compression tests selected from the literature. The SIGMA/W module of the Geostudio® System was adopted to perform the simulations of the triaxial compression tests, and the results showed adequate fit between real tests and numerical simulations. The parameters necessary for the modeling with NorSand model, defined from the numerical calibration, were used in a stress-strain evaluation of a hypothetical upstream tailings dam. These simulations allowed the evaluation of the differences in the tailings storage facility (TSF) responses in terms of both deformation behavior and flow liquefaction instability. Flow liquefaction instability is described in the literature as a complete loss in shear strength and the development of excessive strains due to the contractive response of tailings when subjected to low confining stress. The results suggest that the use of the NorSand model is, in general, a good option to reproduce the typical strain-softening behavior of such structures. Furthermore, it was clear the high sensitivity of the constitutive model parameters, drawing attention to the importance of best laboratory practices for carrying out triaxial tests to obtain reliable parameters for NorSand modeling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Rocks\",\"volume\":\" 48\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Rocks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28927/sr.2024.011322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Rocks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28927/sr.2024.011322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着临界状态土壤力学(CSSM)的出现,空隙率开始与应力状态一起被认为是一个关键参数,它通过使用状态参数来定义土壤和其他颗粒土工材料的力学行为。状态参数是当前空隙率与临界空隙率之间的差值,因此其定义需要临界状态线(CSL)的识别。这项工作介绍了使用 NorSand 构成模型从文献中选取的三组三轴压缩试验中得出的数值校准结果。采用 Geostudio® 系统的 SIGMA/W 模块对三轴压缩试验进行了模拟,结果表明真实试验与数值模拟之间存在充分的拟合。在对假定的上游尾矿坝进行应力应变评估时,采用了数值校准确定的 NorSand 模型建模所需的参数。通过这些模拟,可以评估尾矿库(TSF)在变形行为和流动液化不稳定性方面的反应差异。流动液化不稳定性在文献中被描述为尾矿在受到低约束应力时由于收缩反应而完全丧失剪切强度并产生过大的应变。结果表明,使用 NorSand 模型总体上可以很好地再现此类结构的典型应变软化行为。此外,构成模型参数的高度敏感性也是显而易见的,这提醒人们注意实验室进行三轴试验的最佳做法的重要性,以便为 NorSand 模型获取可靠的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical sensitivity analysis for stress-strain simulation and flow liquefaction assessment of tailings storage facilities using the NorSand constitutive model
With the advent of critical state Soil Mechanics (CSSM), the void ratio began to be recognized as a key parameter, along with the stress state, which defines the mechanical behavior of soils and other particulate geomaterials by using the state parameter. The state parameter is the difference between the current and critical void ratio so that its definition requires the critical state line (CSL) identification. This work presents numerical calibration results, using the NorSand constitutive model, from three sets of triaxial compression tests selected from the literature. The SIGMA/W module of the Geostudio® System was adopted to perform the simulations of the triaxial compression tests, and the results showed adequate fit between real tests and numerical simulations. The parameters necessary for the modeling with NorSand model, defined from the numerical calibration, were used in a stress-strain evaluation of a hypothetical upstream tailings dam. These simulations allowed the evaluation of the differences in the tailings storage facility (TSF) responses in terms of both deformation behavior and flow liquefaction instability. Flow liquefaction instability is described in the literature as a complete loss in shear strength and the development of excessive strains due to the contractive response of tailings when subjected to low confining stress. The results suggest that the use of the NorSand model is, in general, a good option to reproduce the typical strain-softening behavior of such structures. Furthermore, it was clear the high sensitivity of the constitutive model parameters, drawing attention to the importance of best laboratory practices for carrying out triaxial tests to obtain reliable parameters for NorSand modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信