加德满都谷地不同地区生乳样本的微生物质量和掺假分析

Laxmi Parajuli, Subash Paudel, Rama Khadka, R. Maharjan, Anima Shrestha
{"title":"加德满都谷地不同地区生乳样本的微生物质量和掺假分析","authors":"Laxmi Parajuli, Subash Paudel, Rama Khadka, R. Maharjan, Anima Shrestha","doi":"10.54796/njb.v11i2.296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Milk is a highly nutritious product that is susceptible to degradation due to microbial activity. Maintaining milk quality is crucial and can be achieved by monitoring specific parameters. This helps preserve the nutritive value of milk, which is essential for proper growth and health. Adulteration and improper storage can diminish the nutritional quality of milk. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the microbial load and adulteration of milk samples collected from various regions of the Kathmandu Valley. Sixty raw milk samples were gathered from local dairies (45) and cow farms (15) between April 2019 and July 2019. These samples were evaluated for microbial quality (total plate count, total coliform count, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio spp.) and adulterants (starch, table sugar, soda, soap, and hydrogen peroxide) following standard guidelines. Out of the total samples, 58.3% (35) exhibited coliform growth, while Shigella spp. and Vibrio spp. did not grow on any media. Among coliforms, Enterobacter spp. was the most prevalent at 33.3%, followed by Escherichia coli at 32%. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that the highest proportion of bacteria was sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and Gentamycin, followed by Ceftazidime. Adulteration analysis indicated that 33.3% and 48.3% of samples were adulterated with sugar and soda, respectively. Starch and soap were not detected in any analyzed samples. The highest titratable acidity (0.16%) was observed in cow farms compared to dairy farms. The findings of this study suggest an urgent need for routine quality testing of milk samples available in the market to prevent the spread of milk-borne diseases and preserve the nutritive value of milk.","PeriodicalId":34186,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of microbiological quality and adulteration of raw milk samples from different areas of Kathmandu Valley\",\"authors\":\"Laxmi Parajuli, Subash Paudel, Rama Khadka, R. Maharjan, Anima Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.54796/njb.v11i2.296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Milk is a highly nutritious product that is susceptible to degradation due to microbial activity. Maintaining milk quality is crucial and can be achieved by monitoring specific parameters. This helps preserve the nutritive value of milk, which is essential for proper growth and health. Adulteration and improper storage can diminish the nutritional quality of milk. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the microbial load and adulteration of milk samples collected from various regions of the Kathmandu Valley. Sixty raw milk samples were gathered from local dairies (45) and cow farms (15) between April 2019 and July 2019. These samples were evaluated for microbial quality (total plate count, total coliform count, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio spp.) and adulterants (starch, table sugar, soda, soap, and hydrogen peroxide) following standard guidelines. Out of the total samples, 58.3% (35) exhibited coliform growth, while Shigella spp. and Vibrio spp. did not grow on any media. Among coliforms, Enterobacter spp. was the most prevalent at 33.3%, followed by Escherichia coli at 32%. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that the highest proportion of bacteria was sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and Gentamycin, followed by Ceftazidime. Adulteration analysis indicated that 33.3% and 48.3% of samples were adulterated with sugar and soda, respectively. Starch and soap were not detected in any analyzed samples. The highest titratable acidity (0.16%) was observed in cow farms compared to dairy farms. The findings of this study suggest an urgent need for routine quality testing of milk samples available in the market to prevent the spread of milk-borne diseases and preserve the nutritive value of milk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54796/njb.v11i2.296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54796/njb.v11i2.296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛奶是一种高营养产品,容易因微生物活动而降解。保持牛奶质量至关重要,可通过监测特定参数来实现。这有助于保持牛奶的营养价值,对正常生长和健康至关重要。掺假和不当储存会降低牛奶的营养质量。因此,本研究旨在评估从加德满都谷地不同地区采集的牛奶样本中的微生物含量和掺假情况。在 2019 年 4 月至 2019 年 7 月期间,从当地乳制品厂(45 个)和奶牛养殖场(15 个)收集了 60 份生乳样本。按照标准指南对这些样本进行了微生物质量(总平板计数、总大肠菌群计数、沙门氏菌属、志贺氏菌属和弧菌属)和掺杂物(淀粉、食糖、苏打、肥皂和过氧化氢)评估。在所有样本中,58.3%(35 个)的样本有大肠菌群生长,而志贺氏杆菌和弧菌在任何培养基上都没有生长。在大肠菌群中,最常见的是肠杆菌,占 33.3%,其次是大肠埃希氏菌,占 32%。抗生素敏感性测试显示,对环丙沙星和庆大霉素敏感的细菌比例最高,其次是头孢他啶。掺假分析表明,分别有 33.3% 和 48.3% 的样品掺入了糖和苏打。在所有分析样品中均未检测到淀粉和肥皂。与奶牛场相比,奶牛场的可滴定酸度(0.16%)最高。这项研究的结果表明,迫切需要对市场上的牛奶样本进行常规质量检测,以防止牛奶传播疾病并保护牛奶的营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of microbiological quality and adulteration of raw milk samples from different areas of Kathmandu Valley
Milk is a highly nutritious product that is susceptible to degradation due to microbial activity. Maintaining milk quality is crucial and can be achieved by monitoring specific parameters. This helps preserve the nutritive value of milk, which is essential for proper growth and health. Adulteration and improper storage can diminish the nutritional quality of milk. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the microbial load and adulteration of milk samples collected from various regions of the Kathmandu Valley. Sixty raw milk samples were gathered from local dairies (45) and cow farms (15) between April 2019 and July 2019. These samples were evaluated for microbial quality (total plate count, total coliform count, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Vibrio spp.) and adulterants (starch, table sugar, soda, soap, and hydrogen peroxide) following standard guidelines. Out of the total samples, 58.3% (35) exhibited coliform growth, while Shigella spp. and Vibrio spp. did not grow on any media. Among coliforms, Enterobacter spp. was the most prevalent at 33.3%, followed by Escherichia coli at 32%. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that the highest proportion of bacteria was sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and Gentamycin, followed by Ceftazidime. Adulteration analysis indicated that 33.3% and 48.3% of samples were adulterated with sugar and soda, respectively. Starch and soap were not detected in any analyzed samples. The highest titratable acidity (0.16%) was observed in cow farms compared to dairy farms. The findings of this study suggest an urgent need for routine quality testing of milk samples available in the market to prevent the spread of milk-borne diseases and preserve the nutritive value of milk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信