系统合理性对社会凝聚力的贡献

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
E. Agadullina, D.I. Lavelina
{"title":"系统合理性对社会凝聚力的贡献","authors":"E. Agadullina, D.I. Lavelina","doi":"10.17759/sps.2023140406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Objective. </strong>Analysis of the contribution of the system justification to social cohesion. <br><strong>Background. </strong>Social cohesion in Russia, as well as around the world, is declining, despite its beneficial impact on the society. In accordance with the System Justification theory, there is reason to assume a connection between the system justification and social cohesion, but no empirical verification has been carried out. <br><strong>Study design. </strong>The study examined the relationship between the system justification and different levels of social cohesion. The study used the system justification scale and measurements of variables of interpersonal trust, density of social relationships, openness, social participation, institutional trust and legitimacy of institutions. The presence and nature of the relationship was verified through correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). <br><strong>Participants. </strong>819 Russians (52% of women) from 18 to 83 years old (<em>M</em> = 37,7; <em>SD</em> = 10,7). <br><strong>Measurements. </strong>Russian-language versions of the scales of system justification by J. Jost. G. Bottoni's model of social cohesion. <br><strong>Results. </strong>The model of social cohesion was successfully tested on a Russian sample, but macro-level variables cannot be separated and do not allow the formation of the second factor of the model by type of measurement (objective and subjective). System justification significantly predicts all levels of social cohesion. The regression model showed that the more people tend to justify the system, the more they trust others, get involved in various group interactions and positively evaluate the institutional activities. <br><strong>Conclusions. </strong>The system justification significantly positively predicts social cohesion at the micro, meso and macro levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Contribution of the System Justification to Social Cohesion\",\"authors\":\"E. Agadullina, D.I. Lavelina\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/sps.2023140406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p style=\\\"text-align: justify;\\\"><strong>Objective. </strong>Analysis of the contribution of the system justification to social cohesion. <br><strong>Background. </strong>Social cohesion in Russia, as well as around the world, is declining, despite its beneficial impact on the society. In accordance with the System Justification theory, there is reason to assume a connection between the system justification and social cohesion, but no empirical verification has been carried out. <br><strong>Study design. </strong>The study examined the relationship between the system justification and different levels of social cohesion. The study used the system justification scale and measurements of variables of interpersonal trust, density of social relationships, openness, social participation, institutional trust and legitimacy of institutions. The presence and nature of the relationship was verified through correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). <br><strong>Participants. </strong>819 Russians (52% of women) from 18 to 83 years old (<em>M</em> = 37,7; <em>SD</em> = 10,7). <br><strong>Measurements. </strong>Russian-language versions of the scales of system justification by J. Jost. G. Bottoni's model of social cohesion. <br><strong>Results. </strong>The model of social cohesion was successfully tested on a Russian sample, but macro-level variables cannot be separated and do not allow the formation of the second factor of the model by type of measurement (objective and subjective). System justification significantly predicts all levels of social cohesion. The regression model showed that the more people tend to justify the system, the more they trust others, get involved in various group interactions and positively evaluate the institutional activities. <br><strong>Conclusions. </strong>The system justification significantly positively predicts social cohesion at the micro, meso and macro levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2023140406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。分析制度理由对社会凝聚力的贡献。背景。尽管社会凝聚力对社会产生了有益的影响,但在俄罗斯以及全世界,社会凝聚力正在下降。根据 "制度合理性 "理论,我们有理由认为制度合理性与社会凝聚力之间存在联系,但目前尚未进行实证验证。研究设计。本研究探讨了制度合理性与不同程度的社会凝聚力之间的关系。研究使用了制度合理性量表,并对人际信任、社会关系密度、开放性、社会参与、制度信任和制度合法性等变量进行了测量。通过相关分析和结构方程模型(SEM)验证了这种关系的存在和性质。参与者819 名俄罗斯人(52% 为女性),年龄从 18 岁到 83 岁(M = 37.7;SD = 10.7)。测量。俄语版本的系统合理性量表,由 J. Jost.G. Bottoni 的社会凝聚力模型。结果。社会凝聚力模型成功地在俄罗斯样本中进行了测试,但宏观变量无法分开,也无法按测量类型(客观和主观)形成模型的第二个因子。系统合理性对所有社会凝聚力水平都有明显的预测作用。回归模型显示,人们越倾向于证明制度的合理性,他们就越信任他人,参与各种群体互动,并积极评价机构活动。结论在微观、中观和宏观层面上,制度合理性对社会凝聚力都有明显的正向预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Contribution of the System Justification to Social Cohesion

Objective. Analysis of the contribution of the system justification to social cohesion.
Background. Social cohesion in Russia, as well as around the world, is declining, despite its beneficial impact on the society. In accordance with the System Justification theory, there is reason to assume a connection between the system justification and social cohesion, but no empirical verification has been carried out.
Study design. The study examined the relationship between the system justification and different levels of social cohesion. The study used the system justification scale and measurements of variables of interpersonal trust, density of social relationships, openness, social participation, institutional trust and legitimacy of institutions. The presence and nature of the relationship was verified through correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).
Participants. 819 Russians (52% of women) from 18 to 83 years old (M = 37,7; SD = 10,7).
Measurements. Russian-language versions of the scales of system justification by J. Jost. G. Bottoni's model of social cohesion.
Results. The model of social cohesion was successfully tested on a Russian sample, but macro-level variables cannot be separated and do not allow the formation of the second factor of the model by type of measurement (objective and subjective). System justification significantly predicts all levels of social cohesion. The regression model showed that the more people tend to justify the system, the more they trust others, get involved in various group interactions and positively evaluate the institutional activities.
Conclusions. The system justification significantly positively predicts social cohesion at the micro, meso and macro levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信