用于加密的混沌系统比较研究

Doaa S. Salman, Jolan Rokan Naif
{"title":"用于加密的混沌系统比较研究","authors":"Doaa S. Salman, Jolan Rokan Naif","doi":"10.25195/ijci.v49i2.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chaotic systems leverage their inherent complexity and unpredictability to generate cryptographic keys, enhancing the security of encryption algorithms. This paper presents a comparative study of 13 chaotic keymaps. Several evaluation metrics, including keyspace size, dimensions, entropy, statistical properties, sensitivity to initial conditions, security level, practical implementation, and adaptability to cloud computing, are utilized to compare the keymaps. Keymaps such as Logistic, Lorenz, and Henon demonstrate robustness and high-security levels, offering large key space sizes and resistance to attacks. Their efficient implementation in a cloud computing environment further validates their suitability for real-world encryption scenarios. The context of the study focuses on the role of the key in encryption and provides a brief specification of each map to assess the effectiveness, security, and suitability of the popular chaotic keymaps for encryption applications. The study also discusses the security assessment of resistance to the popular cryptographic attacks: brute force, known plaintext, chosen plaintext, and side channel. The findings of this comparison reveal the Lorenz Map is the best for the cloud environment based on a specific scenario.","PeriodicalId":53384,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHAOTIC SYSTEM FOR ENCRYPTION\",\"authors\":\"Doaa S. Salman, Jolan Rokan Naif\",\"doi\":\"10.25195/ijci.v49i2.457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chaotic systems leverage their inherent complexity and unpredictability to generate cryptographic keys, enhancing the security of encryption algorithms. This paper presents a comparative study of 13 chaotic keymaps. Several evaluation metrics, including keyspace size, dimensions, entropy, statistical properties, sensitivity to initial conditions, security level, practical implementation, and adaptability to cloud computing, are utilized to compare the keymaps. Keymaps such as Logistic, Lorenz, and Henon demonstrate robustness and high-security levels, offering large key space sizes and resistance to attacks. Their efficient implementation in a cloud computing environment further validates their suitability for real-world encryption scenarios. The context of the study focuses on the role of the key in encryption and provides a brief specification of each map to assess the effectiveness, security, and suitability of the popular chaotic keymaps for encryption applications. The study also discusses the security assessment of resistance to the popular cryptographic attacks: brute force, known plaintext, chosen plaintext, and side channel. The findings of this comparison reveal the Lorenz Map is the best for the cloud environment based on a specific scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25195/ijci.v49i2.457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25195/ijci.v49i2.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混沌系统利用其固有的复杂性和不可预测性生成加密密钥,从而提高了加密算法的安全性。本文对 13 个混沌密钥映射进行了比较研究。本文采用了多个评估指标,包括密钥空间大小、维数、熵、统计特性、对初始条件的敏感性、安全等级、实用性和对云计算的适应性,对密钥映射进行了比较。Logistic 密钥映射、Lorenz 密钥映射和 Henon 密钥映射等密钥映射显示出稳健性和高安全等级,具有较大的密钥空间大小和抗攻击能力。它们在云计算环境中的高效实施进一步验证了它们在现实世界加密场景中的适用性。研究的背景重点是密钥在加密中的作用,并简要说明了每种密钥图,以评估流行的混沌密钥图在加密应用中的有效性、安全性和适用性。研究还讨论了对流行加密攻击(暴力攻击、已知明文攻击、选择明文攻击和侧信道攻击)的安全性评估。比较结果表明,基于特定场景,洛伦兹图最适合云环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHAOTIC SYSTEM FOR ENCRYPTION
Chaotic systems leverage their inherent complexity and unpredictability to generate cryptographic keys, enhancing the security of encryption algorithms. This paper presents a comparative study of 13 chaotic keymaps. Several evaluation metrics, including keyspace size, dimensions, entropy, statistical properties, sensitivity to initial conditions, security level, practical implementation, and adaptability to cloud computing, are utilized to compare the keymaps. Keymaps such as Logistic, Lorenz, and Henon demonstrate robustness and high-security levels, offering large key space sizes and resistance to attacks. Their efficient implementation in a cloud computing environment further validates their suitability for real-world encryption scenarios. The context of the study focuses on the role of the key in encryption and provides a brief specification of each map to assess the effectiveness, security, and suitability of the popular chaotic keymaps for encryption applications. The study also discusses the security assessment of resistance to the popular cryptographic attacks: brute force, known plaintext, chosen plaintext, and side channel. The findings of this comparison reveal the Lorenz Map is the best for the cloud environment based on a specific scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信