Hyoseo An, Taesang Ahn, Sumin Kang, Jiuk Shin, Kihak Lee
{"title":"ENTA 墙体框架系统的结构性能测试和有限元分析","authors":"Hyoseo An, Taesang Ahn, Sumin Kang, Jiuk Shin, Kihak Lee","doi":"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.6.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study rigorously assessed the structural performance of the wall frame system through a combination of experimentation and simulation under cyclic loading. Hence, three distinct specimens were developed: the original frame (referred to as the “as-built frame”), the retrofitted frame with ENTA damper system (referred to as “ENTA-W”), and the retrofitted frame with both ENTA damper system and steel frame (referred to as “ENTA-WR’). The experimental findings revealed that the retrofitted frames outperformed the as-built frame regarding energy dissipation ability, initial stiffness, and maximum load capacity. A detailed analysis and comparison between experimental and finite element analysis results were conducted. Notably, disparities between the experimental and analytical outcomes were lower than or near five percent regarding energy dissipation capacity, initial stiffness, and maximum strength. Moreover, the anticipated failure pattern of the concrete section and the stress distribution of the reinforcing bar closely mirrored those observed in the experiment.","PeriodicalId":416980,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","volume":" 1118","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Performance Testing and Finite Element Analysis of the ENTA Wall Frame System\",\"authors\":\"Hyoseo An, Taesang Ahn, Sumin Kang, Jiuk Shin, Kihak Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.6.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study rigorously assessed the structural performance of the wall frame system through a combination of experimentation and simulation under cyclic loading. Hence, three distinct specimens were developed: the original frame (referred to as the “as-built frame”), the retrofitted frame with ENTA damper system (referred to as “ENTA-W”), and the retrofitted frame with both ENTA damper system and steel frame (referred to as “ENTA-WR’). The experimental findings revealed that the retrofitted frames outperformed the as-built frame regarding energy dissipation ability, initial stiffness, and maximum load capacity. A detailed analysis and comparison between experimental and finite element analysis results were conducted. Notably, disparities between the experimental and analytical outcomes were lower than or near five percent regarding energy dissipation capacity, initial stiffness, and maximum strength. Moreover, the anticipated failure pattern of the concrete section and the stress distribution of the reinforcing bar closely mirrored those observed in the experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"volume\":\" 1118\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.6.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.6.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究通过实验和模拟相结合的方法,严格评估了墙体框架系统在循环荷载下的结构性能。因此,开发了三种不同的试样:原始框架(称为 "原建框架")、带有 ENTA 阻尼器系统的改装框架(称为 "ENTA-W")以及带有 ENTA 阻尼器系统和钢框架的改装框架(称为 "ENTA-WR")。实验结果表明,改造后的框架在消能能力、初始刚度和最大承载能力方面均优于原建框架。对实验结果和有限元分析结果进行了详细分析和比较。值得注意的是,在消能能力、初始刚度和最大强度方面,实验结果与分析结果之间的差距低于或接近 5%。此外,混凝土截面的预期破坏模式和钢筋的应力分布也与实验中观察到的情况十分吻合。
Structural Performance Testing and Finite Element Analysis of the ENTA Wall Frame System
This study rigorously assessed the structural performance of the wall frame system through a combination of experimentation and simulation under cyclic loading. Hence, three distinct specimens were developed: the original frame (referred to as the “as-built frame”), the retrofitted frame with ENTA damper system (referred to as “ENTA-W”), and the retrofitted frame with both ENTA damper system and steel frame (referred to as “ENTA-WR’). The experimental findings revealed that the retrofitted frames outperformed the as-built frame regarding energy dissipation ability, initial stiffness, and maximum load capacity. A detailed analysis and comparison between experimental and finite element analysis results were conducted. Notably, disparities between the experimental and analytical outcomes were lower than or near five percent regarding energy dissipation capacity, initial stiffness, and maximum strength. Moreover, the anticipated failure pattern of the concrete section and the stress distribution of the reinforcing bar closely mirrored those observed in the experiment.